Skip to content

ESET Research analyzed a critical flaw in Windows Imaging Component, which abuses JPG files

ESET researchers have concluded an in-depth examination of CVE-2025-50165, a Windows Imaging Component vulnerability. Although classified as critical, ESET’s root cause analysis suggests the complexity of exploitation makes large-scale attacks highly improbable.
Technical Distinction: The flaw exists in the encoding and compression stage of a JPG image, not the decoding (rendering) stage. Simply viewing a malicious image will not trigger the vulnerability.

Root Cause: WindowsCodecs.dll

The vulnerability occurs when WindowsCodecs.dll attempts to encode a JPG image using 12-bit or 16-bit data precision. The specific function involved, jpeg_finish_compress, is triggered during specific actions such as saving an image or generating system thumbnails.

Expert Analysis

“Our analysis indicates that exploitation is harder than it appears,” says ESET researcher Romain Dumont. “A host application is only vulnerable if it allows JPG images to be re-encoded, and even then, an attacker would need precise control over heap manipulation and address leaks to achieve remote code execution.”

Key Takeaways

  • Open Source Roots: The component utilizes libjpeg-turbo, which saw similar vulnerabilities patched in late 2024.
  • Reproduction: ESET has successfully reproduced the system crash using a 12-bit/16-bit JPG test method.
  • Status: Microsoft released a patch for this vulnerability in August; users are encouraged to verify their systems are up to date.
For the full technical report, visit WeLiveSecurity.com and search for “Revisiting CVE-2025-50165.”

About ESET
For 30 years, ESET® has been developing industry-leading IT security software and services for businesses and consumers worldwide. With solutions ranging from endpoint security to encryption and two-factor authentication, ESET’s high-performing, easy-to-use products give individuals and businesses the peace of mind to enjoy the full potential of their technology. ESET unobtrusively protects and monitors 24/7, updating defenses in real time to keep users safe and businesses running without interruption. Evolving threats require an evolving IT security company. Backed by R&D facilities worldwide, ESET became the first IT security company to earn 100 Virus Bulletin VB100 awards, identifying every single “in-the-wild” malware without interruption since 2003.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Multi-Region OCI VDI: The Definitive Global Deployment Strategy

Introduction: From Network Theory to Global VDI Reality

In a previous analysis, “Optimizing Multi-Cloud Network Performance,” this series established that latency is the cardinal challenge in any global application deployment. For real-time, interactive workloads like Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI), this challenge becomes an absolute barrier. The analysis quantified the “Optimal Performance Radius,” concluding that for a truly responsive experience—such as video conferencing or high-frequency data exchange—users must be within 100-200 kilometers of the serving gateway, achieving latency of less than 20 milliseconds.

Once latency climbs above 50 milliseconds, which occurs at distances beyond 500 kilometers, noticeable delays begin to “affect processes”. For a global enterprise with teams in New York, London, and Singapore, this data presents an unavoidable conclusion: a single-region VDI deployment is architecturally indefensible. It is a mathematical certainty that users outside the host region will experience significant lag, leading to user frustration, lost productivity, and failed project adoption.

Therefore, a multi-region architecture is not a “nice-to-have” for disaster recovery; it is a foundational, non-negotiable requirement for any global VDI deployment.

This article provides the definitive architectural blueprint for solving this multi-region challenge. It details a strategy that combines a VDI platform built for a decoupled, global model—Thinfinity Workspace—with a cloud platform architected for true regional independence and high-performance networking: Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI).

The Architectural Foundation: Why OCI’s Design Defeats VDI Complexity

Before designing the VDI solution, the choice of the underlying Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) is critical. While market leaders have dominated the conversation, their architectures contain hidden risks for global VDI. Recent major outages have exposed the “enemies of resilience”: centralized control planes and edge-level configuration risks. A heavy reliance on a single “master” region, such as AWS’s us-east-1, means a localized failure there can create a cascading disruption to global operations.

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) was architected from the ground up to prevent this. Its design philosophy aligns perfectly with the needs of a resilient, global VDI:

  • True Regional Autonomy: OCI treats each region as a completely fault-isolated domain. Unlike other providers, there is no hidden dependency on a single master region for core functions. If one OCI region experiences a failure, the others “keep operating—fully, autonomously, and without interruption”. For a global VDI, this means an outage in the Ashburn region will not impact the functionality of the Frankfurt or Singapore regions.
  • High-Performance Fabric: Within each region, OCI is built with a flat, non-blocking network fabric. This design guarantees low-latency, high-throughput, and highly predictable performance. This is critical for the “east-west” traffic of a VDI deployment, such as VDI instances communicating with high-IOPS storage backends for user profiles.
  • Economical Data Transfer: A multi-region architecture is only viable if the cost of data replication is predictable. OCI’s pricing model, which includes lower data egress fees and global flat-rate pricing, directly addresses the high egress costs identified as a major multi-cloud challenge. This makes the high-volume replication of user profiles and golden images—a requirement for any multi-region strategy—economically feasible.

This synergistic match of decoupled, autonomous IaaS regions and a cost model that encourages data replication makes OCI the ideal foundation for a modern, resilient VDI architecture.

Thinfinity + OCI: A Modern, Decoupled VDI Architecture

The next layer is the VDI platform itself. Legacy VDI solutions (often called “traditional VDI”) carry significant “architecture debt”. These monolithic stacks, built for on-premises data centers, are a complex tapestry of brokers, StoreFront servers, load balancers (ADCs), and licensing servers. This model is operationally heavy, requires niche and expensive specialized administrators, and creates a fragile system where “slow change cycles” for updates can take weeks.

Thinfinity Workspace provides a modern alternative built on a lightweight, containerized, microservices-based architecture. This decoupled design is uniquely suited for OCI’s regional model. The key components for a global deployment are:

  • Communication Gateways: These are the user-facing entry points, functioning as highly efficient reverse proxies. In a global deployment, a fleet of these gateways is deployed in every OCI region, as close to the end-users as possible. This is the lynchpin for achieving the sub-20ms latency goal.
  • Broker: This lightweight control plane manages Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), identity brokering (SAML, OIDC), and resource pooling. Its flexible architecture allows it to be deployed in a high-availability (HA) model within a region, completely decoupled from the gateways.
  • Virtualization Agent: A simple agent deployed on the VDI pools (VMs). It establishes a connection to the broker using a unique agent ID, eliminating the complex IP-based network dependencies that plague legacy systems and simplifying network security rules.

All user connections are 100% browser-based (HTML5) or via an optional lightweight client. The entire session is brokered over HTTPS/TLS, requiring no VPNs and integrating natively with any SAML or OIDC identity provider. This provides a built-in Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) framework from day one.

For architects evaluating global VDI on OCI, the choice of platform has profound implications for cost, complexity, and resilience.

Table 1: VDI Solution Comparison on OCI

Feature Thinfinity Workspace on OCI Citrix DaaS on OCI VMware Horizon on OCVS OCI Secure Desktops
Architecture Decoupled Services (Gateways, Broker) Running On OCI Native. Cloud-native. Monolithic “architecture debt” (Cloud Connectors, ADCs). Control plane is external. Requires full VMware SDDC (vSphere, NSX) on OCI Bare Metal (OCVS). OCI-native service, simplified componentry.
Multi-Region Model Simple and flexible. Deploy regional gateways and VDI pools. Flexible broker placement. Complex. Relies on centralized Citrix Cloud control plane. Regional resources (connectors) link back to it. Highly complex. Requires multi-pod/site architecture (Cloud Pod Architecture) & global load balancers. Regional service. Multi-region requires manual setup of compute, storage, and networking in each region.
ZTNA Built-in. No VPN, HTTPS brokering, native IdP integration. Requires separate Citrix Gateway / ADC (formerly NetScaler). Adds complexity and cost. Requires separate Unified Access Gateway (UAG) appliances. OCI-native ZTNA, but less flexible than a full VDI solution.
Client Access 100% Clientless HTML5 (or optional native client). Requires Citrix Workspace app for full features. HTML5 access is limited. Requires Horizon Client for full features and protocol optimization. HTML5 or thin client access.
OCI Integration Native. Deploys on standard OCI Compute (VMs, GPU) & VCNs. Integrates with OCI SDK/API. Deploys on OCI Compute, but control plane is an external SaaS. Integration via Cloud Connectors. Abstracted. Runs on VMware hypervisor (ESXi) on bare metal, not native OCI KVM. Manages its own network (NSX). Native. Fully managed OCI service.
Licensing Simple: Concurrent Users. Complex: Named User / CCU, feature-tiered. Extremely complex: VMware licensing + OCI bare-metal infrastructure costs. OCI-native, consumption-based pricing.

Reference Architecture: The Multi-Region Hub-and-Spoke VDI Topology

This reference architecture implements OCI’s best-practice network pattern—the hub-and-spoke topology—to build a secure, scalable, and globally-replicated VDI environment.

This design is deployed in each OCI region (e.g., Frankfurt and Ashburn). A global networking layer connects them.

Regional Hub VCN (Virtual Cloud Network):

This VCN acts as the central point of connectivity for all shared services and ingress/egress traffic. It contains:

  • Public Subnet: An OCI Load Balancer and OCI Web Application Firewall (WAF) provide a secure, highly-available public entry point.
  • Private Gateway Subnet: A fleet of Thinfinity Communication Gateways, which receive traffic from the load balancer.
  • Private Management Subnet: The Thinfinity Broker (in an HA model), Active Directory domain controllers, and administrator bastion hosts (or the OCI Bastion service).
  • Private Storage Subnet: High-performance file servers (e.g., Windows VMs on OCI Block Volumes) or OCI File Storage (FSS) instances that host the FSLogix user profile shares.

Regional Spoke VCN(s):

These VCNs are peered to the Hub VCN and are used to isolate the VDI workloads. This separation of concerns is a security best practice. They contain:

  • Private VDI Subnet(s): The VDI desktop pools, which can be standard VMs for task workers or NVIDIA A10-based GPU instances (VM.GPU.A10.1) for power users.

The Thinfinity Virtualization Agents are installed on these VMs, which initiate connections outbound to the Broker in the Hub VCN.

The Global “Glue”:

  • OCI Dynamic Routing Gateway (DRG v2): Each regional Hub VCN is attached to its own DRG. The DRGs in each region are then peered together, creating a high-speed, private global backbone over OCI’s network for replication traffic.
  • OCI Traffic Management: This global DNS service sits “above” all regions, intelligently directing users to the nearest regional Hub VCN based on their geographic location.

Technical Deep Dive: Core OCI Networking for Global VDI

Global Backbone with Dynamic Routing Gateway (DRG v2)

For connecting the regional deployments, architects could use older Remote VCN Peering (RPCs). However, this method is point-to-point and becomes unmanageable in a mesh of many regions.

The modern and superior solution is the OCI Dynamic Routing Gateway (DRG v2). A DRG is a powerful virtual router that can attach to VCNs, on-premises FastConnect circuits, and—most importantly—other DRGs via RPCs. It supports up to 300 VCN attachments and has its own internal, programmable route tables.

This enables a clean “DRG Transit Hub” design. Instead of a complex mesh, each regional Hub VCN attaches to its local DRG. The DRGs are then connected to each other. This creates a scalable, high-performance global transit backbone for all “backend” VDI traffic, such as user profile replication, which flows securely over the OCI backbone, not the public internet.

Intelligent Ingress with OCI Traffic Management Steering Policies

The DRG solves the backend network; OCI Traffic Management solves the frontend user latency problem. This service is the practical implementation of the “Geo-IP based routing” discussed in the previous article.

A Traffic Management Steering Policy is configured for the global VDI DNS name (e.g., desktop.mycorp.com). The policy type will be Geolocation Steering.

This policy uses “Answer Pools” and “Steering Rules”:

  • Answer Pool 1 (NA): The public IP of the OCI Load Balancer in the Ashburn region.
  • Answer Pool 2 (EMEA): The public IP of the OCI Load Balancer in the Frankfurt region.
  • Steering Rule 1: If DNS query originates from North America, return Answer Pool 1.
  • Steering Rule 2: If DNS query originates from Europe, return Answer Pool 2.
  • Default Rule: All other queries are sent to a default pool (e.g., the closest or primary).

When a user in London opens their browser, their DNS query is resolved to the Frankfurt endpoint, achieving the sub-20ms latency target.

Regional HA and Security with Load Balancers & WAF

The Geolocation policy must point to a highly-available endpoint. This is the regional OCI Load Balancer. This is a managed OCI service that operates at Layer 7 (HTTP), terminates SSL, and distributes incoming user connections across the fleet of private Thinfinity Gateways.

This is a point of critical architectural simplification. Legacy VDI solutions like VMware Horizon have complex networking requirements, including the need to maintain session persistence between an initial TCP authentication and the subsequent UDP-based protocol traffic. This is “not possible” with the standard OCI Load Balancer, forcing complex workarounds.

Thinfinity, being 100% HTML5-first, brokers the entire user session over a standard HTTPS (TCP) connection. It therefore works perfectly with the standard, managed OCI L7 Load Balancer, requiring no complex UDP persistence, no third-party appliances, and no complex network engineering.

For security, the OCI Web Application Firewall (WAF) is layered in front of the public Load Balancer. It is configured with a “deny-by-default” policy to inspect all incoming traffic and protect the Thinfinity Gateways from web exploits and other L7 attacks.

Table 2: OCI Multi-Region VDI Networking Components

OCI Service Service Type Role in Global VDI Architecture
OCI Traffic Management Global DNS Geo-IP Routing: Directs users to the nearest OCI region based on their location. Solves the <20ms latency goal.
OCI Load Balancer (L7) Regional L7 High Availability: Terminates SSL and distributes traffic across the regional fleet of Thinfinity Gateways.
OCI WAF Security Gateway Protection: Protects the public-facing Load Balancers and Thinfinity Gateways from L7 attacks.
OCI Dynamic Routing Gateway (DRG v2) Global Routing Global Backbone: Acts as a transit hub to mesh all regional Hub VCNs, enabling secure, private replication traffic.

Solving the Global User State: Multi-Region Profile Management

The most complex challenge in any multi-region VDI deployment is managing user state. For modern Windows VDI, this means managing FSLogix Profile Containers. These are VHD or VHDX virtual disk files, typically stored on a central SMB file share, that mount to the VDI at login to provide a persistent user profile.

In a multi-region disaster recovery (DR) scenario, the question is: how do we replicate the user’s VHDX file from the primary region (Frankfurt) to the DR region (Ashburn)?

Solution Pattern 1 (Recommended): OCI File Storage with Cross-Region Replication

The simplest, most robust, and most cost-effective solution leverages OCI’s native storage capabilities.

  • Storage: The FSLogix profile shares are hosted on file servers in the Hub VCN’s private storage subnet. These file servers use high-performance OCI Block Volumes for their data. Alternatively, the managed OCI File Storage (FSS) service can be used for NFS-based shares.
  • Replication: The key OCI feature is that both OCI Block Volumes and OCI File Storage (FSS) support native, asynchronous cross-region replication.
  • Mechanism: This replication is configured at the block level, beneath the file system. It simply replicates changed blocks from the primary region’s volume (Frankfurt) to a read-only destination volume (Ashburn). Because it is not file-aware, it is not affected by the file-locking issues that plague other solutions.

This OCI-native replication is the perfect tool for an Active-Passive DR plan, providing a clear Recovery Point Objective (RPO) with zero performance impact on the active user session.

Solution Pattern 2 (Alternative Geometries)

Other common methods are far more complex and fragile:

  • FSLogix Cloud Cache: This is FSLogix’s built-in feature for active-active replication, where the user’s client writes to multiple SMB shares simultaneously. This is notoriously complex, can be fragile, and generates massive I/O overhead, which can slow user login and logoff times.
  • Windows DFS-N + DFS-R: It is common to use DFS-Namespace (DFS-N) to create a global share path (e.g., \\mycorp.com\profiles). However, DFS-Replication (DFS-R) is explicitly NOT supported for FSLogix profile containers. Its file replication mechanism cannot handle the open file locks of VHDX files and will lead to data corruption.
  • Windows DFS-N + 3rd Party Sync: Viable alternative if OCI-native replication is not an option.

OCI’s native storage replication services fundamentally simplify VDI disaster recovery, making complex and fragile application-level replication tools obsolete for most standard DR patterns.

Table 3: Global User Profile Replication Strategies on OCI

Replication Solution Architecture Performance Impact Complexity Recommended Use Case
OCI Storage Cross-Region Replication Active-Passive (DR) None. Asynchronous, block-level replication. No impact on user session I/O. Low. OCI-native, “set it and forget it” feature. Recommended: Primary DR strategy for 99% of deployments.
FSLogix Cloud Cache Active-Active High. Duplicates all profile writes to all locations. Can slow login/logoff. Very High. Fragile, difficult to troubleshoot, high I/O cost. Niche: For “follow-the-sun” active-active models where users must have instant R/W access in any region.
Windows DFS-N + DFS-R Active-Passive N/A (DFS-R is unsupported) High. (DFS-N is fine) NOT SUPPORTED. DFS-R will corrupt FSLogix profiles.

The “Golden Image” Factory: An Automated Multi-Region CI/CD Pipeline

The second major operational challenge of multi-region VDI is managing “golden images.” Manually patching and distributing new images across the globe is a prime example of “golden image gymnastics” or “image sprawl”. This slow, manual process, which can take weeks, is error-prone and a significant security risk.

The solution is to treat image management as a CI/CD pipeline, transforming VDI operations from a slow “ITIL” model to a high-speed “DevOps” workflow.

Step 1: Build (Automated)

In a primary “build” region (e.g., Frankfurt), the image creation is automated. This can be done using the OCI Secure Desktops Image Builder, a new CLI tool from Oracle that automates and simplifies the creation of VDI-optimized Windows images. For more advanced automation, OCI DevOps or tools like Packer with Terraform can be used.

Step 2: Distribute (Automated)

This is the key multi-region step, automated using OCI services:

  1. The build process exports the new “Custom Image” to an OCI Object Storage bucket in the Frankfurt region.
  2. An OCI Object Storage replication policy is configured to automatically copy the image file to “replica” buckets in the Ashburn and Singapore regions.
  3. In each destination region, an OCI Function or scheduled script is triggered by the new object’s arrival. This script imports the image from its local Object Storage bucket, creating a new, regional “Custom Image”.

Step 3: Deploy (Orchestrated)

The new Custom Image OCID is now available locally in all regions. Thinfinity Cloud Manager, which is natively integrated with OCI, takes over. It manages the full “golden image lifecycle”. The administrator simply updates the VDI pool definition to point to the new image OCID. Thinfinity’s orchestrator then performs a safe, rolling update of the VDI pools, automatically decommissioning old VMs and provisioning new ones from the updated image based on policy and user demand.

This “Image Factory” pipeline turns a multi-week, high-risk manual task into a low-friction, auditable, and secure automated workflow, allowing organizations to “change at cloud speed”.

Implementing a Zero Trust Framework for Global VDI

This global architecture is not only performant but inherently secure, built on a modern Zero Trust framework rather than an outdated perimeter-based model.

Pillar 1: Identity as the Perimeter (Thinfinity + OCI IAM)

Traditional VDI often requires a VPN or exposes RDP to the internet, creating a massive attack surface. The Thinfinity + OCI model inverts this.

  • No VPN: Thinfinity has a built-in ZTNA framework. All access is brokered over HTTPS/TLS via the regional Thinfinity Gateway. The VDI virtual machines themselves are in private subnets with no direct ingress from the internet.
  • Federated Identity: Thinfinity (acting as the Service Provider) is federated with OCI IAM Identity Domains (acting as the Identity Provider) using SAML 2.0 or OIDC. Thinfinity has native support for SAML-based IdPs.
  • Centralized Enforcement: This federation allows OCI IAM to be the single, authoritative source for identity. It enforces all access policies—such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), RBAC, and device posture checks—before Thinfinity ever brokers the user’s session to a VM. OCI IAM Domains can also be replicated across regions, providing a globally consistent identity source.

Pillar 2: Micro-segmentation (OCI Network Security Groups)

To implement least-privilege access within the VCN, this architecture uses Network Security Groups (NSGs), not OCI’s older, subnet-based Security Lists.

This is a critical distinction. A Security List is “subnet-centric”—to allow VDI VMs to access a file share, one must open SMB port 445 to the entire VDI subnet, which is poor security.

NSGs are “application-centric.” A resource, like a VM’s network interface (VNIC), is assigned to one or more NSGs. The firewall rules can then use other NSGs as the source or destination, not just a CIDR block.

This enables a true micro-segmentation blueprint:

  • vdi-pool-nsg: Assigned to all VDI virtual machines.
  • file-server-nsg: Assigned to the FSLogix profile file servers.
  • ad-controller-nsg: Assigned to the Active Directory domain controllers.

With these in place, the security rules become application-aware and IP-independent:

  • Rule for file-server-nsg: Ingress: Allow TCP/445 from Source = vdi-pool-nsg.
  • Rule for ad-controller-nsg: Ingress: Allow Kerberos/LDAP from Source = vdi-pool-nsg AND Source = file-server-nsg.

This stateful firewalling between application tiers dramatically limits an attacker’s ability to move laterally, a core principle of Zero Trust.

Pillar 3: High-Performance, Secure Workloads (OCI GPUs)

This Zero Trust model does not compromise on performance. For power users in engineering, design, or data science, VDI pools can be provisioned using OCI’s powerful NVIDIA GPU instances. Specifically, the A10 Tensor Core shapes (e.g., VM.GPU.A10.1, VM.GPU.A10.2) are ideal. The NVIDIA A10 is designed for “graphics-rich virtual desktops” and “NVIDIA RTX Virtual Workstation (vWS)” workloads. These high-performance VMs are simply assigned to their own NSG and are protected by the exact same ZTNA framework, receiving secure, brokered access from Thinfinity.

Disaster Recovery Patterns: Active-Active vs. Active-Passive VDI

This architecture provides the building blocks for two distinct multi-region strategies.

Pattern 1: Active-Passive (Hot Standby) – Recommended for DR

This is the most common, cost-effective, and simplest DR model.

  • Primary Region (e.g., Frankfurt): Fully active. All VDI pools are running. OCI Traffic Management directs 100% of global traffic here. The OCI Block Volume/FSS hosting profiles is in read/write mode.
  • DR Region (e.g., Ashburn): Deployed as a “Warm Standby” or “Pilot Light.”
    • Compute: The VDI host pools are provisioned but scaled to zero (or a minimal admin set) to eliminate compute costs.
    • Storage: The profile storage (Block Volume or FSS) is in a read-only state, receiving asynchronous cross-region replication.
  • Failover Process: When an outage is declared in Frankfurt, an administrator (or automated script) executes three steps:
    1. Storage: Promote the Ashburn OCI storage volume from read-only to read/write.
    2. Compute: Use the Thinfinity Cloud Manager to scale up the VDI pools in Ashburn from 0 to 100% capacity.
    3. Network: Update the OCI Traffic Management Steering Policy to route 100% of traffic to the Ashburn Load Balancer.

This strategy provides a full regional failover with a Recovery Time Objective (RTO) measured in minutes, all at a fraction of the cost of an active-active deployment.

Pattern 2: Active-Active – Recommended for Global Performance

This model is not for disaster recovery, but for solving the core latency problem for a globally distributed workforce.

  • Architecture: Both the Frankfurt and Ashburn regions are fully active, simultaneously serving users.
  • Networking: The OCI Geolocation Steering Policy is critical. It routes EMEA users to the Frankfurt VDI pools and North American users to the Ashburn VDI pools, ensuring everyone gets a low-latency (<20ms) experience.

The Profile Challenge: This model creates a significant user profile challenge. If a user from London (EMEA) logs into Frankfurt, their profile is modified. If they fly to New York (NA) the next week and log into Ashburn, they must receive their updated profile, and any changes made in Ashburn must be replicated back to Frankfurt.

This requirement for bi-directional, multi-master replication invalidates the simple, one-way Active-Passive OCI storage replication. This model forces the use of a more complex and fragile application-level solution, such as FSLogix Cloud Cache, to synchronize the user profile VHDX files.

Architects must therefore weigh the trade-offs: the Active-Active deployment provides the best global user performance but at the cost of significantly higher complexity and fragility at the user profile layer.

Conclusion: A Resilient, Performant Global VDI Blueprint

The hard physical limits of latency, which mandate a <20ms round-trip time for a quality user experience, have rendered single-region VDI obsolete for global enterprises. The path forward is a resilient, multi-region architecture.

Success, however, is not achieved by forcing complex, legacy VDI stacks onto a cloud platform. It is achieved through the synergy of a cloud-native VDI platform and a cloud IaaS built for true resilience.

This definitive blueprint provides that synergy:

  • OCI’s Fault-Isolated Regions provide the resilient foundation, eliminating the risk of centralized control plane failures.
  • Thinfinity’s Decoupled Gateways are deployed regionally, solving the user-facing latency problem.
  • OCI’s Global Networking (Traffic Management for Geo-IP routing and DRG v2 for a backend mesh) provides the global connectivity.
  • OCI’s Native Storage Replication provides a simple, robust, and cost-effective solution for Active-Passive disaster recovery.
  • Thinfinity’s Cloud Manager and OCI’s Image/Storage Automation create an “Image Factory,” transforming VDI operations into a modern DevOps workflow.
  • OCI’s NSGs and Thinfinity’s ZTNA provide an “identity-aware” and “application-aware” security posture that is secure by default.

This combination of Thinfinity Workspace and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure is the definitive strategy for deploying a global VDI solution that is performant, resilient, secure, and—most importantly—operationally simple to manage at scale.

About Cybele Software Inc.
We help organizations extend the life and value of their software. Whether they are looking to improve and empower remote work or turn their business-critical legacy apps into modern SaaS, our software enables customers to focus on what’s most important: expanding and evolving their business.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

為什麼 CAF 4.0 需要勒索軟體為先的思維模式——以及 BullWall 如何實現這一點

網路評估框架 (CAF) 4.0 深度解析

為什麼應對「勒索軟件」是達成合規與網路韌性的核心?

導言:CAF 4.0 的新標準

英國最新的 網路評估框架 (Cyber Assessment Framework, CAF) 4.0 已顯著提高了網路韌性的門檻。它要求基礎設施服務供應商的管理層證明,他們不僅了解當前的攻擊行為,更具備在關鍵業務受損前,偵測、阻止並從中恢復的能力。

在眾多威脅中,勒索軟件引發的大規模加密始終是監管機構與企業最關注的焦點。這正是 BullWall 為您的安全架構提供獨特價值的地方。

CAF 4.0 給管理層的挑戰

CAF 4.0 不僅僅是一份合規清單。監管機構正在尋找證據,證明組織能夠抵禦現實且具高影響力的威脅,並維持基本功能的運行。

  • 傳統的預防工具雖然重要,但並非設計用於在加密開始時「即時阻止」。
  • 如果沒有有效的控制與封鎖層,勒索軟件可在幾分鐘內從單個端點演變成整體的營運危機。

BullWall 如何對應 CAF 的核心目標

BullWall 專注於框架中最關鍵的環節:在勒索軟件影響基本服務之前將其阻止。

目標 A:管理網路安全風險

A2.b 了解威脅:CAF 要求董事會展示其減輕現實攻擊行為的能力。BullWall 通過針對最普遍的勒索軟件情境提供主動保護,將理論轉化為實踐。

目標 B:防禦網路攻擊

B4.c 惡意代碼預防:即時偵測並停止勒索軟件的加密嘗試,自動隔離受感染的用戶或端點,防止病毒在網絡中蔓延。

B5.a 限制攻擊影響:在發生大規模加密前制止勒索軟件,保護關鍵營運數據,確保服務不中斷。

目標 C:偵測網路安全事件

C2.a 記錄與監控:生成詳盡的勒索軟件活動日誌,提供完整的透明度(誰在何時、哪個系統嘗試加密),協助進行符合監管要求的調查。

目標 D:將事故影響降至最低

D1.a 事故應變:通過隔離受損資產實現自動化應變,提供鑑定級數據以加速復原與監管報告。

CAF 成果與 BullWall 貢獻對照表

CAF 目標成果 BullWall 的貢獻
A2.b 了解威脅 針對現實攻擊行為提供主動保護與防禦實證
B4.c 預防惡意代碼 即時偵測並制止勒索軟件加密動作
B5.a 限制影響 在演變成大規模停機前完成封鎖與隔離
C2.a 記錄與監控 為調查與合規提供詳細的活動日誌
D1.a 事故應變 自動化封鎖資產,縮短應變時間

總結:給管理層的核心建議

CAF 4.0 明確指出:勒索軟件不僅是 IT 問題,更是董事會層級的營運韌性風險。監管機構期望看到的證據是——您能夠在傷害造成前即時阻斷威脅,而非在事後才進行清理。

BullWall 為您提供這份實證,協助企業保護名譽、確保服務持續性,並向監管機構展示您已為最具威脅的攻擊做好了充分準備。

關於 BullWall
BullWall 是一家專注於保護數據和關鍵 IT 基礎設施免受勒索軟件攻擊的網絡安全解決方案供應商,能夠在幾秒鐘內遏制已知和零日勒索軟件的變種,防止數據加密和外洩,是公司企業對抗勒索軟件的最後一道防線。

關於Version 2

Version 2 Digital 是立足亞洲的增值代理商及IT開發者。公司在網絡安全、雲端、數據保護、終端設備、基礎設施、系統監控、存儲、網絡管理、商業生產力和通信產品等各個領域代理發展各種 IT 產品。透過公司龐大的網絡、通路、銷售點、分銷商及合作夥伴,Version 2 提供廣被市場讚賞的產品及服務。Version 2 的銷售網絡包括台灣、香港、澳門、中國大陸、新加坡、馬來西亞等各亞太地區,客戶來自各行各業,包括全球 1000 大跨國企業、上市公司、公用事業、醫療、金融、教育機構、政府部門、無數成功的中小企及來自亞洲各城市的消費市場客戶。

假期身分安全強化指南

網路攻擊者從不休息。假期的停機時間——伴隨著人力縮減和事故回應變慢——為攻擊者提供了利用 特權身分 的完美窗口。

假期安全強化清單

  • 強制執行 MFA: 所有網域、全域和緊急存取帳號必須強制使用。
  • 輪替憑證: 重點處理高權限服務帳號與 CI/CD 代碼。
  • 查核「緊急帳號」: 驗證緊急備用帳號並設置登入告警。
  • 應用 JIT 存取: 盡可能將常態性特權降低至零。
  • 鎖定 PAWs: 確保特權存取工作站已安裝補丁並限制連網。

使用 Segura® 守護您的身分邊界

Segura® 身分安全平台 提供對人類與機器身分的完整可見性。透過自動偵測風險路徑並執行即時存取 (Just-in-Time),Segura 確保在您休假期間,沒有任何未受管的特權帳號會被駭客利用。

 

關於 Segura®

Segura® 致力於確保企業對其特權操作與資訊的自主掌控。為此,我們透過追蹤管理者在網絡、伺服器、資料庫及眾多裝置上的操作,有效防範資料竊取。此外,我們也協助企業符合稽核要求及最嚴格的標準,包括 PCI DSS、沙賓法案(Sarbanes-Oxley)、ISO 27001 及 HIPAA。

關於Version 2

Version 2 Digital 是立足亞洲的增值代理商及IT開發者。公司在網絡安全、雲端、數據保護、終端設備、基礎設施、系統監控、存儲、網絡管理、商業生產力和通信產品等各個領域代理發展各種 IT 產品。透過公司龐大的網絡、通路、銷售點、分銷商及合作夥伴,Version 2 提供廣被市場讚賞的產品及服務。Version 2 的銷售網絡包括台灣、香港、澳門、中國大陸、新加坡、馬來西亞等各亞太地區,客戶來自各行各業,包括全球 1000 大跨國企業、上市公司、公用事業、醫療、金融、教育機構、政府部門、無數成功的中小企及來自亞洲各城市的消費市場客戶。

深入了解勒索軟體郵件威脅

深入了解勒索軟體郵件威脅

勒索軟體即服務 (RaaS) 模型已將網路犯罪轉變為一個高度流程化的產業。現今的攻擊者利用 AI 自動化發動網路釣魚,其效率比人工方式高出 350%。對於現代企業而言,識別並防範這些威脅已成為首要任務。

關鍵洞察: AI 自動化資訊蒐集的準確率高達 88%,這使得攻擊者能夠更輕易、低成本地發動大規模且極具個性化的「魚叉式網路釣魚」。

勒索軟體郵件的運作方式

犯罪分子利用社交工程手段操弄人類情感(如恐懼或好奇心),誘導使用者安裝惡意軟體。常見手段包括:

  • 網路釣魚 (Phishing): 仿冒合法來源的大量郵件,誘導點擊惡意連結。
  • 魚叉式網路釣魚 (Spear Phishing): 針對特定個人或組織進行深度研究後發動的精準攻擊。
  • 鯨吞式攻擊 (Whaling): 針對高層領導者 (C-suite),旨在騙取大額轉帳授權或機密數據。

為何這些威脅能持續奏效?

1. 人為因素

攻擊成功通常是因為利用了心理弱點:

  • 權威信任: 冒充人力資源部或執行長要求執行緊急操作。
  • 認知負荷: 趁員工在忙碌、高壓的日常工作中疏於檢查郵件細節。
  • 好奇心與獎勵: 提供看似「好到令人難以置信」的虛假機會或獎勵。

2. 技術規避

現代勒索軟體常利用合法的雲端基礎設施(如 Dropbox 或 Outlook)來規避安全過濾器,並使用資安資料庫中尚未記錄的「零日」載荷。習。

緩解威脅的最佳實踐

多層次的防禦策略對於保護數位資產至關重要:

識別高度受攻擊對象 (VAPs)

犯罪分子會針對擁有高價值存取權限的特定員工。資安團隊應:

  • 關聯數據,找出在郵件和終端設備上最常被攻擊的使用者。
  • 建立以人為中心的儀表板,追蹤一段時間內的攻擊趨勢。
  • 優先調查涉及高風險 VAPs 的警報。

實施進階郵件安全

除了基礎設定外,應導入 DMARC 驗證、加密敏感郵件,並深入蒐集關於被攔截威脅與冒充企圖的遙測數據。

集中化與數據關聯

將 SIEM 解決方案與即時威脅情報結合,資安團隊能建立高準確度的警報,將初始的釣魚郵件與後續異常的網絡活動聯繫起來。

關於 Graylog
Graylog 通過完整的 SIEM、企業日誌管理和 API 安全解決方案,提升公司企業網絡安全能力。Graylog 集中監控攻擊面並進行深入調查,提供卓越的威脅檢測和事件回應。公司獨特結合 AI / ML 技術、先進的分析和直觀的設計,簡化了網絡安全操作。與競爭對手複雜且昂貴的設置不同,Graylog 提供強大且經濟實惠的解決方案,幫助公司企業輕鬆應對安全挑戰。Graylog 成立於德國漢堡,目前總部位於美國休斯頓,服務覆蓋超過 180 個國家。

關於 Version 2 Digital
Version 2 Digital 是立足亞洲的增值代理商及IT開發者。公司在網絡安全、雲端、數據保護、終端設備、基礎設施、系統監控、存儲、網絡管理、商業生產力和通信產品等各個領域代理發展各種 IT 產品。透過公司龐大的網絡、通路、銷售點、分銷商及合作夥伴,Version 2 提供廣被市場讚賞的產品及服務。Version 2 的銷售網絡包括台灣、香港、澳門、中國大陸、新加坡、馬來西亞等各亞太地區,客戶來自各行各業,包括全球 1000 大跨國企業、上市公司、公用事業、醫療、金融、教育機構、政府部門、無數成功的中小企及來自亞洲各城市的消費市場客戶。

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

×