Even the most secure perimeter means little once an attacker is inside. That’s where lateral movement begins, and understanding how to prevent lateral movement is a must.

While phishing attacks and endpoint breaches dominate headlines, it’s the post-intrusion maneuvering—when threat actors quietly escalate privileges, pivot across systems, and harvest credentials—that often determines the true impact of a breach.

Lateral movement definition

Lateral movement refers to the techniques cyber attackers use after initial compromise to move deeper within a network, often with the goal of gaining access to high-value systems or data. Rather than striking immediately, bad actors exploit internal tools, credentials, and trust relationships to move stealthily between endpoints—avoiding detection while gaining more access and control.

This phase of a cyber-attack is especially dangerous because it unfolds inside the network perimeter, where traditional defenses like firewalls and antivirus solutions offer limited visibility. Detecting lateral movement often requires a combination of behavioral analytics, access control enforcement, and visibility into how users and systems interact—especially around privileged accounts and critical assets like the domain controller.

The attack chain: how lateral movement typically unfolds

Lateral movement attacks don’t happen in a single step—they unfold over a series of calculated moves designed to escalate access and maintain stealth. Here are the stages of lateral movement:

Stage 1: Initial access

The attacker breaches the perimeter through methods like phishing attacks, exploiting remote services (e.g., RDP or VPN), or targeting unpatched vulnerabilities. Once inside, attackers establish a foothold but remain limited in scope—often landing on a low-privilege endpoint.

Common techniques: Phishing, brute-force attacks, vulnerable public-facing apps
Defensive response: Multi-factor authentication, endpoint detection, access control policies

Stage 2: Reconnaissance and enumeration

With a foothold established, the attacker begins mapping the internal environment. They collect information about user accounts, system architecture, network shares, and potential targets such as the domain controller or privileged accounts.

Common techniques: Netstat, PowerShell scripts, built-in OS tools
Defensive response: Least privilege enforcement, intrusion detection systems, user behaviour analytics

Stage 3: Credential dumping and privilege escalation

To move further, malicious actors seek elevated access. They use tools to dump credentials, exploit privilege escalation vulnerabilities, or abuse poorly protected password management systems to access accounts.

Common techniques: Mimikatz, token manipulation, credential reuse
Defensive response: Endpoint detection, password management best practices, privilege segmentation

Stage 4: Lateral movement

Now armed with valid credentials and internal knowledge, the cybercriminal begins accessing various systems in the network. They use lateral movement techniques, such as exploiting SMB, WMI, or remote desktop protocol (RDP) to access additional machines and data.

Common techniques: Pass-the-Hash, Pass-the-Ticket, WMI, RDP, PsExec
Defensive response: Network segmentation, monitor remote services, restrict internal movement with Zero Trust solutions

Stage 5: Target acquisition and impact

The final goal is usually exfiltration, encryption, or business disruption. The attacker reaches high-value assets (e.g., network controller, file servers, customer databases), and carries out their objective—often undetected if lateral movement hasn’t been flagged.

Common techniques: Data exfiltration, ransomware deployment, system sabotage
Defensive response: Threat detection via machine learning, monitoring of unusual activity, real-time response

Key techniques attackers use for lateral movement

Once inside a network, bad actors rely on various lateral movement techniques to gain higher-level access and quietly move between systems. These methods often abuse legitimate tools and protocols, making them difficult to detect:

• Pass-the-Hash (PtH): Reuses hashed credentials captured from memory to authenticate on other systems without needing plaintext passwords.
• Pass-the-Ticket (PtT): Relies on Kerberos tickets (TGTs or service tickets) to access services across the domain.
• Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP): Uses remote services to gain access to other machines via legitimate remote desktop functionality.
• Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI): Executes commands and scripts remotely, often without triggering alerts.
• PsExec: Runs processes on remote systems—commonly abused for executing commands across hosts.
• Credential dumping: Extracts credentials stored in memory or the registry using tools like Mimikatz.
• Shared network access abuse: Moves through shared drives, mapped folders, or misconfigured file shares.
• Token impersonation: Hijacks access tokens to impersonate users—especially high-privilege accounts.
• Internal spear phishing: Sends malicious content to users within the network to steal further credentials or plant malware.
• Exploitation of poor password hygiene: Takes advantage of reused or weak credentials, especially when password management practices are lacking.

Real-world example: SolarWinds attack (2020)

One of the most devastating lateral movement attacks to date occurred during the SolarWinds supply chain breach. After compromising the Orion software update mechanism, cybercriminals gained initial access to multiple US government and enterprise networks.

Once inside, they used credential dumping, token impersonation, and customized lateral movement techniques to silently traverse systems for months—targeting domain controllers and cloud environments.

• Estimated impact: ~18,000 organizations received the malicious update
• Dwell time: Up to 9 months undetected
• Threat group: APT29 (Cozy Bear), linked to Russian intelligence

How to detect lateral movement

Detecting lateral movement is particularly difficult because attackers often mimic legitimate user behavior and exploit trusted internal systems. However, several strategies and technologies can help expose suspicious activity before it leads to a full-blown compromise:

• Behavioral analytics: One of the most effective ways to detect lateral movement is to analyze user behavior over time to identify sudden deviations—like a user accessing unfamiliar systems or logging in at odd hours—that may signal compromise.
• Endpoint monitoring: Deploy Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools to track processes, login attempts, and access to sensitive assets. Watch for signs of credential dumping or remote command execution.
• Unusual access patterns: Monitor for activity that falls outside normal user roles or workflows— such as PsExec or RDP use between endpoints that don’t typically communicate.
• Multi-factor authentication (MFA) alerts: Watch for failed or bypassed MFA attempts, which can serve as early indicators of a lateral movement attack in progress.
• Threat detection systems: Use machine learning-based threat detection to flag low-and-slow attacks that traditional defenses might miss. These systems can correlate subtle anomalies across the network to detect lateral movement.
• Audit privileged account usage: Closely monitor high-level accounts for unusual activity, especially after initial compromise. Lateral movement often involves attackers attempting to escalate their own privileges and abuse these accounts.
• Track remote service usage: Investigate unexpected or unauthorized use of internal remote services, which can be leveraged to pivot across systems.
• Shrink the attack surface: While not a detection method in itself, limiting lateral access through segmentation and access control boosts visibility and raises red flags when violations occur.

Steps to preventing lateral movement

1. Segment and isolate the network

Flat networks make lateral movement easy. Implement internal segmentation to limit access between departments, teams, and resources. Isolate sensitive assets—like network controllers and critical servers—within protected zones that can only be accessed under strict conditions. Technologies like software-defined perimeters and microsegmentation can help reduce exposure and enforce contextual access boundaries.

2. Enforce least privilege access

Users should only have access to the systems and data they absolutely need. Overprivileged accounts are a key enabler of lateral movement. Apply the principle of least privilege (PoLP) across all identities—users, admins, and services—and ensure privileges are continuously reviewed and revoked when no longer needed.

3. Monitor identity and access

Track who is accessing what, from where, and when. Continuous monitoring of identity and access helps surface abnormal behavior—like a standard user accessing sensitive systems or credentials being used in new geographies. Integrate single sign-on (SSO), strong password policies, and Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to maintain visibility and reduce risk, and align with network monitoring best practices.

4. Detect and respond in real-time

Lateral movement is often subtle and slow. Use detection tools that combine behavior analysis, anomaly detection, and response automation to spot threats before they escalate. Visibility across endpoints and cloud services is essential to correlate signals and trigger rapid remediation actions.

5. Implement Zero Trust architecture

Adopting a Zero Trust approach ensures no user or device is inherently trusted—even inside the network. Authenticate every session, verify device posture, and validate contextual risk before granting access. This architecture effectively disrupts lateral movement paths by requiring continuous verification.

NordLayer’s role in lateral movement defense

Preventing lateral movement requires more than visibility—it demands control over how users interact with your network from the inside out. NordLayer is designed to give IT teams that control, combining intelligent access policies with modern network architecture to block lateral paths and contain threats before they escalate.

A key part of this strategy is segmentation. With NordLayer’s network segmentation tools, organizations can create secure, logically separated environments that limit movement between users, departments, and critical infrastructure. Whether your team is fully remote, hybrid, or distributed across multiple locations, segmentation ensures attackers can’t freely pivot once inside.

Identity and access management is just as essential. NordLayer supports granular access controls and SSO integration, allowing administrators to define exactly who can reach what—and under which conditions. This level of control makes it easier to flag anomalies, shut down credential abuse, and enforce least-privilege policies across the board.

At the core of NordLayer’s approach is Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), which eliminates the assumption that anything inside your network should be trusted by default. Every user, device, and request is authenticated continuously, with access granted only if context, location, and risk level align. This disrupts the internal freedom lateral movement attacks rely on—stopping threats at the access point, even after initial compromise.

For organizations, the stakes are high: lateral movement attacks don’t just steal data—they threaten operations, reputation, and compliance. NordLayer empowers IT leaders, CISOs, and security architects to go beyond detection and actively architect environments that are resilient by design. When attackers can’t move freely, they can’t succeed—and that’s where NordLayer gives you the edge.

Contact sales to see how NordLayer can help your organization.

Imagine an attacker quietly gaining access to sensitive patient information in your hospital network—reading lab results, personal health information, insurance details, and even payment data, undetected for weeks. For many healthcare organizations, this is not a hypothetical scenario but a daily concern.

In a world driven by electronic health records and digital transformation, healthcare data security has become critical for protecting patient privacy, maintaining operational integrity, and complying with strict regulations while building patient trust.

In this article, we’ll walk through what makes healthcare data security uniquely challenging and why it’s critical to get it right—from understanding the most common threats to implementing practical strategies that protect patient data.

What is healthcare data security?

Healthcare data security refers to the policies, practices, and technologies healthcare providers and companies use to protect electronic health records (EHRs), personal health information (PHI), and other sensitive patient data from unauthorized access, corruption, or theft.

It ensures that patient data security aligns with regulatory requirements, organizational goals, and patient privacy expectations.

Healthcare data security involves implementing layered security measures, including secure networks, encryption, role-based access control (RBAC), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and continuous monitoring to protect healthcare data across all systems and endpoints.

Why healthcare data is a growing cybersecurity concern

The healthcare industry is especially exposed to cyber threats that are becoming more advanced and frequent. While the number of data breaches continues to rise, several reasons make healthcare data security harder to maintain:

Surge in digital patient data & interconnectedness

The widespread adoption of EHRs, coupled with the rapid expansion of telehealth services and remote patient monitoring, has dramatically increased the volume of sensitive patient data stored, processed, and transmitted digitally.

Every new digital tool helps patient care, but also gives attackers more points to target. The amount of valuable data makes healthcare organizations attractive targets for cybercriminals.

Fragmented systems & outdated infrastructure

Many healthcare providers still use old systems that were not built with modern cybersecurity in mind. These outdated systems often lack security features, have known weaknesses, and are hard to update or patch, making them easy targets for bad actors.

Replacing or upgrading these systems can be expensive, so many healthcare organizations struggle to modernize their cybersecurity.

High value of healthcare data on the black market

Unlike credit card numbers, which can be quickly canceled, PHI and insurance data are incredibly valuable on the black market. They can be used for various illicit activities, including identity theft, insurance fraud, and even medical fraud, for years.

This high street value makes healthcare organizations exceptionally attractive targets for financially motivated cybercriminals, leading to an alarming number of data breaches—only in May 2025, 59 breaches were reported in the U.S. healthcare sector, affecting 1.8 M individuals.

The average cost of a healthcare data breach is significantly higher than in other sectors, reflecting the sensitive nature of the data involved.

The expanding attack surface

The healthcare ecosystem is incredibly complex, with healthcare organizations relying heavily on a vast network of third-party vendors for everything from billing and IT services to specialized medical devices. If not properly secured, each third-party connection represents a potential entry point for attackers.

Furthermore, the growing use of IoT medical devices—from smart infusion pumps to remote monitoring sensors—introduces new vulnerabilities. Many of these devices are not built with robust healthcare data security in mind, creating a wider attack surface and increasing the risk of data breaches.

Resource constraints & skill gaps

Despite the critical nature of their data, many healthcare organizations operate with limited cybersecurity budgets and a lack of skilled cybersecurity professionals to manage it. This makes it harder to implement, maintain, and continuously update the advanced security measures necessary to keep pace with modern threats.

The ability to invest in cutting-edge healthcare data security tools and retain top talent is often a challenge.

Key regulations in healthcare data protection

To ensure patient data security and privacy, healthcare organizations must comply with several key regulations:

• Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA): Establishes national standards for protecting sensitive patient information.
• Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH): Encourages healthcare providers to adopt electronic health records while strengthening the privacy and security protections under HIPAA.
• General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): This regulation applies to healthcare providers processing EU residents’ data and requires strict data protection measures.
• State-specific privacy laws: Regulations like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) may also apply, emphasizing patient privacy and data security practices.

These regulations are designed to ensure healthcare data protection, requiring healthcare organizations to adopt robust security measures and implement strong data protection practices.

Top security threats to healthcare organizations

Various cybersecurity firms and annual industry reports confirm healthcare as a prime target for specific attack types like ransomware and phishing. Reports from cybersecurity firms like Proofpoint indicate that 88–92% of healthcare organizations experience cyber-attacks once a year. The threats they mostly encounter are:

Ransomware attacks

These remain one of the most debilitating threats. Often initiated via phishing or exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities, ransomware encrypts critical systems and patient data, demanding a ransom. Such attacks can bring hospital operations to a standstill, directly impacting patient care and causing extensive data breaches, with recovery costs often in the millions.

Insider breaches

Not all threats originate externally. Employees or contractors with authorized access can intentionally misuse or accidentally expose patient data, from unauthorized snooping to misdirected emails. These incidents pose serious patient data security issues and are particularly challenging to detect given the authorized access.

Phishing and credential theft

Phishing remains a primary initial vector for many cyber-attacks. Highly sophisticated campaigns target healthcare providers to trick staff into revealing login credentials. Once stolen, these credentials grant attackers unauthorized access to internal networks and sensitive patient data, directly leading to data breaches.

Third-party and vendor risks

The intricate supply chain means healthcare organizations rely on numerous vendors. Insecure systems within these third parties can become direct entry points into an organization’s network. A data breach at a vendor can thus compromise data for multiple partner healthcare organizations, creating a snowball effect on healthcare data security.

IoT vulnerabilities

While beneficial, the growing use of IoT medical devices introduces significant security risks. Many such devices prioritize functionality over robust security, often lacking strong authentication or encryption. This vulnerability allows potential unauthorized access to patient data or even manipulation of device functionality, impacting both healthcare data security and patient safety.

Security challenges in the healthcare industry

The healthcare industry faces a unique and persistent set of challenges in maintaining effective data security in healthcare, which often exceed those found in other sectors. Successfully addressing these requires a careful understanding of the operational realities within healthcare organizations.

• Balancing ease of access for medical staff with robust patient data security. Healthcare environments demand immediate, seamless access to patient information, especially in critical situations, making it a constant struggle to enforce strong network security without impeding patient care efficiency.
• Integrating new technologies while maintaining compliance and security measures. The rapid adoption of innovations like AI and telemedicine requires careful integration into existing infrastructures, all while ensuring continuous regulatory compliance and maintaining a high level of data security across all systems.
• Limited budgets and IT resources for advanced security tools. Many healthcare organizations, especially smaller providers, operate with constrained cybersecurity budgets and a shortage of skilled professionals, limiting their ability to invest in advanced healthcare data security tools and increasing their vulnerability to sophisticated cyber-attacks and data breaches.
• Managing a diverse ecosystem of connected devices and vendor systems. A typical healthcare organization faces a challenge in ensuring consistent and effective data security across many interconnected medical devices, diverse IT systems, and numerous external vendor platforms that broaden the attack surface and increase the potential for undetected data breaches.

These challenges encourage healthcare organizations to adopt a proactive, multi-layered, and flexible approach to data protection. It’s not a one-time fix but an ongoing commitment to continuous improvement, built on robust strategies and strong partnerships. Let’s explore this more by diving into the best practices of data protection in healthcare.

Best practices to protect healthcare data

Implementing a strong healthcare data security strategy requires a combination of technology, processes, and people. These best practices are crucial for healthcare organizations aiming to prevent data breaches and maintain patient trust.

Role-based access control (RBAC) and MFA

Limit access to sensitive patient information based on job roles and enforce multi-factor authentication to add an extra layer of protection for EHRs. This ensures that employees only access the data necessary for their duties. At the same time, MFA significantly hardens login security, making it much more difficult for unauthorized users to gain access even with stolen credentials.

Encryption and secure data handling

Encrypt patient data at rest and in transit to safeguard healthcare data from unauthorized access. Even if a system is compromised, encryption renders the data unreadable to attackers. Implement secure data handling practices, including strict protocols for data disposal and secure file sharing, to minimize exposure risks.

Continuous staff training

Regularly train staff on data security practices, phishing awareness, and handling sensitive patient information securely to reduce human error. An informed workforce is often the first line of defense, capable of identifying and reporting potential threats before they escalate into data breaches.

Vendor and third-party oversight

Vet vendors and third-party services to ensure they follow strong data protection practices and do not expose your organization to unnecessary risks. Comprehensive due diligence and ongoing monitoring of third-party security postures are essential to extend your healthcare data security perimeter beyond your immediate infrastructure.

How to respond to a healthcare data breach

Despite all preventative efforts, data breaches can and do happen. A swift, organized, and compliant response is crucial to minimizing damage, restoring operational integrity, and rebuilding patient trust. This is a critical component of overall healthcare data security.

1. Contain the incident and assess the scope

Immediately isolate affected systems to prevent further damage and assess the scope of compromised patient data. Quick containment limits the spread of the breach, while a rapid assessment helps understand what data was impacted and how many individuals are affected.

2. Investigate the cause and preserve evidence

Identify how the breach occurred, preserve evidence for compliance and potential legal needs, and understand vulnerabilities in your systems. A thorough forensic investigation is vital not only for accountability but also to prevent future similar incidents and strengthen healthcare data security.

3. Notify affected parties and implement long-term fixes

Notify affected individuals and regulatory bodies as required, while addressing the root causes to strengthen data security in healthcare and prevent future incidents. Clear communication and quick action help reduce legal risks and regain trust in your data security.

How can NordLayer help with data security in healthcare

NordLayer supports healthcare providers and companies by securing their networks, helping with security compliance, and protecting healthcare data through layered security, Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), and continuous monitoring.

Our healthcare cybersecurity solutions are designed to address the complex challenges of healthcare data security, providing a robust defense against modern cyber threats. We help healthcare organizations strengthen data security and maintain patient trust while working toward compliance with healthcare regulations.

Frequently asked questions

What types of healthcare data are most frequently targeted by attackers?

Attackers typically target electronic health records, PHI, insurance data, and payment details due to their high value on the black market. These data types are central to many data breaches in the healthcare sector.

Do smaller healthcare providers face the same security challenges as large systems?

Yes, smaller healthcare providers face similar security challenges but often with fewer resources, making them particularly vulnerable to cyber threats and data breaches. They may lack the sophisticated defenses of larger healthcare organizations.

How do you secure healthcare data?

Securing healthcare data involves a layered approach, including role-based access, encryption, continuous monitoring, regular staff training, and strong vendor management, while aligning with regulatory requirements for healthcare data protection.

Today, traditional perimeter-based security models are no longer enough. With sensitive data flowing across hybrid environments, remote endpoints, and decentralized cloud systems, the challenge is no longer where data is—but who can access it and under what conditions. Zero Trust Data Protection offers a modern, policy-driven framework that rethinks how data security should function in a world where implicit trust is a liability.

This article explores what Zero Trust Data Protection really means, how it differs from broader Zero Trust security strategies, and why forward-thinking enterprises are adopting it as a foundational layer of their cybersecurity. If your organization handles sensitive data—and needs to ensure it’s always protected regardless of location, user, or device—this guide is for you.

What is Zero Trust Data Protection?

Zero Trust Data Protection (ZTDP) is an advanced security approach that applies Zero Trust principles specifically to how data is accessed, used, and protected. Unlike traditional models that assume trust based on network location or credentials, ZTDP follows the “never trust, always verify” philosophy—enforcing strict access controls and continuous validation across every layer of data interaction.

While it shares DNA with Zero Trust architecture, ZTDP goes a step further by shifting the focus from infrastructure to data access itself. This means that even if a user, device, or application gains entry into a trusted environment, data access is never assumed. Instead, policies built around least privilege access, real-time context, and behavioral signals govern who or what can interact with sensitive information—and under what conditions.

How does Zero Trust differ from traditional data security models?

Traditional data security models were built around the idea of a secure perimeter—think firewalls, VPNs, and on-premises access controls. In these models, once a user or device was authenticated and “inside the network,” they were typically granted broad access to internal systems and protected data. Trust was implicit, and security was largely dependent on defending the perimeter.

Zero Trust Data Protection completely upends this approach. Rooted in Zero Trust principles and enforced through Zero Trust architecture, ZTDP assumes that no user, device, or process should be trusted by default—even if inside the corporate network. Instead, every attempt to access data is treated as potentially hostile and evaluated in real time using contextual signals like identity, device health, geolocation, and behavior.

Another key distinction is how access is granted. While legacy systems often rely on static role-based access, ZTDP enforces least privilege access, ensuring that users can only access the data and resources they absolutely need, and only for the duration required. These strict access controls dramatically reduce the attack surface and limit lateral movement in the event of a breach.

In short, while traditional models focus on protecting the network, Zero Trust Data Protection is designed to protect the data itself—wherever it resides. This shift is critical in remote work, cloud adoption, and escalating insider threats. For organizations aiming to modernize their security posture and prevent unauthorized access or data loss, ZTDP isn’t just an upgrade—it’s a necessity.

What’s the difference between Zero Trust Data Protection and Zero Trust Data Security?

While often used interchangeably, Zero Trust Data Protection and Zero Trust Data Security serve distinct purposes—and understanding the difference is critical for businesses building advanced cybersecurity strategies.

In short, ZTDP differs from Zero Trust Data Security in that it centers more narrowly on data as the protected asset, rather than the broader ecosystem of users, networks, and endpoints. It strengthens an organization’s security posture, mitigates the risk of unauthorized access, and forms the backbone of effective data loss prevention strategies in modern, decentralized environments.

To put things into perspective, Zero Trust Data Security refers to the broader application of the Zero Trust security model. It includes securing networks, applications, endpoints, and identities, and is designed to eliminate implicit trust across the IT environment. Its goal is to reduce attack surfaces and prevent lateral movement through continuous verification and contextual authentication.

Zero Trust Data Protection, on the other hand, applies those principles directly to confidential data itself. Rather than focusing on infrastructure or identity per se, ZTDP enforces least privilege access to data at the object level—governing who or what can interact with specific data assets, under which conditions, and for how long. This data-centric approach is especially valuable in complex, distributed environments where access to data is fluid and dynamic.

The distinction matters. A company may implement Zero Trust security controls across its network and endpoints, but still leave data vulnerable if access policies aren’t enforced at the data layer. ZTDP closes that gap, enabling granular enforcement, contextual visibility, and stronger protection against unauthorized access—whether from external actors or insider threats.

This difference isn’t just theoretical. A 2021 study found that organizations implementing mature Zero Trust strategies—including data-level enforcement—experienced 63% lower breach costs and detected incidents 45% faster than those relying on traditional models or partial Zero Trust rollouts. In another example, a mid-sized healthcare provider reduced insider threat incidents by 40% after adopting data-centric Zero Trust controls, which limited data access to authorized personnel only, in real-time conditions.

For B2B organizations handling regulated or high-value data, Zero Trust Data Protection represents the next level of strategic investment—one that directly supports compliance, operational resilience, and long-term risk reduction.

Benefits of Zero Trust Data Protection

Securing data today isn’t just about keeping intruders out—it’s about controlling exactly who can access what, and under what conditions. As businesses grow more distributed and data becomes increasingly portable, traditional security approaches that focus on the perimeter or user identity alone are no longer enough. Zero Trust Data Protection takes a different approach: it puts the data at the center of the security strategy.

Below are some of the most valuable outcomes organizations can expect when implementing a ZTDP model:

Minimizes the attack surface

ZTDP reduces risk by enforcing least privilege access—only verified users and systems get access to the data they’re explicitly authorized to use. This limits the impact of compromised credentials or insider threats and prevents lateral movement within the environment.

Improves data visibility and control

One of the core benefits of Zero Trust—and of ZTDP specifically—is enhanced operational visibility. This makes it easier to detect unusual activity, apply dynamic policies, and respond to incidents faster.

Supports regulatory compliance

ZTDP helps meet regulatory requirements by applying precise, auditable controls to protected data. Organizations can enforce consistent policies and demonstrate that access is both justified and logged, simplifying audits and reducing compliance risk.

Key principles of Zero Trust applied to data protection

The principles of Zero Trust security form the foundation of an effective data protection strategy. When applied specifically to securing sensitive data, these principles help organizations reduce risk, enforce precise access controls, and respond dynamically to changing threats. Here are the core Zero Trust security principles as they relate to data protection:

• Never trust, always verify. Trust is never assumed—even within the corporate network. Every request to access data must be authenticated, authorized, and continuously evaluated based on context such as user identity, device health, and location.
• Least privilege access. Users, applications, and devices are granted only the minimum level of data access necessary to perform their function. This reduces the blast radius of potential breaches and enforces tight control over who can interact with which data.
• Continuous verification. ZTDP relies on ongoing validation—not one-time authentication. Access is reassessed in real time using telemetry and behavior analysis, ensuring that session context and trust levels remain valid throughout.

How NordLayer helps implement Zero Trust Data Protection

Implementing Zero Trust Data Protection requires more than just high-level strategy—it demands technology that can enforce granular access controls, support dynamic work environments, and scale securely across your infrastructure. That’s where NordLayer’s platform stands out.

NordLayer enables organizations to apply Zero Trust security principles directly to data access, ensuring that every interaction with sensitive resources is authorized, authenticated, and context-aware. With identity-based Network Access Control (NAC), network segmentation, and Device Posture Security, NordLayer helps enforce least privilege access across your distributed workforce.

Its centralized Control Panel allows IT teams to manage user permissions, apply policy changes in real time, and monitor data activity across cloud and on-prem environments. By continuously verifying user and device trust levels, NordLayer ensures that access is both dynamic and compliant with modern security standards.

For organizations navigating complex compliance landscapes or hybrid infrastructure, NordLayer offers the tools to move from legacy perimeter-based models toward practical, enforceable Zero Trust solutions—ones that place data access at the core of the security strategy.

Every access attempt to your network is significant—and quickly detecting unusual patterns can be critical for protecting your organization’s sensitive data. While occasional failed logins are normal, a sudden surge in login attempts can indicate brute-force attacks, signaling that someone may be trying to gain unauthorized access.

At NordLayer, we’re committed to protecting what matters most to your business while keeping security simple to manage. That’s why we continue to improve the Control Panel, which gives IT teams greater visibility and monitoring capabilities. These updates are part of our mission to provide layered, proactive protection without disrupting daily operations, helping you stay ahead of modern risks with confidence.

Instant visibility with the Failed Logins data

We’re introducing powerful new Failed Logins data within your Control Panel’s Dashboards section. It provides an overview of suspicious or unauthorized access attempts across your NordLayer Control Panel, apps, and Browser Extension—whether users log in via SSO or email/password, with or without 2FA.

Now, you’ll find a dedicated Failed Logins widget and graph that offers visibility into:

• The number of attempts to log in within 24 hours
• Trends that might indicate a targeted brute force attack
• Anomalies that require your immediate attention

This instant insight helps you spot potential threats early, allowing you to stay in control and act before issues escalate. It’s a proactive approach to mitigating security risks.

Activity section upgrade—detailed Failed Logins log

To complement the Dashboards feature, we’ve also improved the Activity section. Now, a detailed Failed Logins log is available, providing 24-hour data and granular context for each unsuccessful access attempt.

This comprehensive log equips IT admins with crucial information, including:

• Name and email—who attempted to log in
• Exact date and time—when the attempt occurred
• Device IP address—the location of the attempt
• Device or browser Information—what was used
• Login method—SSO or email and password
• Failure reason—which part of the login process failed
• Number of failed attempts (per session)—to identify persistent efforts
• Role (owner, member, etc.)—context about the user’s permissions
• Status of the user—active, invited, etc

This level of visibility empowers your team to react faster to anomalies, investigate suspicious patterns thoroughly, and strengthens your overall threat response strategy with confidence.

By analyzing these patterns, admins can detect anomalies in user behavior, which may indicate brute force attacks, compromised accounts, or insider threats.

Dashboards overview

Beyond the new Failed Logins data, our redesigned Dashboards experience makes your security and usage insights clearer and more actionable.

Your NordLayer Dashboards continue to offer a wealth of valuable information, including:

• User activity. Monitor who is connecting, when, and from where.
• Throughput usage. Track data consumption across your network.
• Server load. Keep an eye on performance and optimize resource allocation.
• Connection trends. Understand network patterns and peak usage times.

These insights are vital for optimizing network performance, managing user access, and maintaining a robust security posture, all from a centralized control point.

Usage vs. Security categories

We’re restructuring the dashboard to improve clarity and streamline your experience. You’ll now find insights clearly grouped under two new, intuitive categories: Usage and Security.

Usage

This section provides an overview of network activity, throughput consumption, and user engagement, helping you manage resources efficiently. You’ll still find familiar visualizations, including:

• Graphs for sessions, protocols, server bandwidth
• Donut charts for device OS distribution, browser type distribution, and NordLayer client versions

Security

This new dedicated section consolidates all critical security-related data, including the new Failed Logins data, threat alerts, compliance-related metrics, and 2FA enablement percentages. This clear separation ensures that your most vital security information is easily accessible, allowing for rapid assessment and decision-making.

The new structure not only simplifies navigation but also makes it easier to focus on specific areas of your network’s performance and security health.

Why it matters

These updates are more than just new additions; they’re about giving IT admins and organization owners better visibility and monitoring capabilities for proactive security and streamlined operations.

1. Monitor failed logins to instantly spot potential unauthorized access attempts or brute-force attacks, helping mitigate security risks before they escalate.
2. Gain deeper insights into user behavior patterns to detect anomalies indicating compromised accounts or insider threats.
3. Enforce stricter access controls and align with Zero Trust principles by continually verifying access based on failed login data. This allows you to quickly implement additional authentication measures or adjust permissions when suspicious activity is detected.
4. When a spike in failed logins occurs, quickly investigate, block suspicious IPs, or temporarily suspend accounts, reducing response time and minimizing exposure.
5. Contribute to audit trails with detailed logs of failed login attempts for compliance with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, fostering accountability and demonstrating due diligence.
6. Highlight areas where users might need additional training on password management or where access policies require refinement, such as implementing MFA for frequent failures.

By providing clear, actionable intelligence, NordLayer helps your organization detect threats early, stay in control, and act before issues escalate into significant incidents.

Final thoughts

The new Failed Logins data and the redesigned Dashboards experience represent a significant step forward in improving your cybersecurity with NordLayer. These tools will give you greater peace of mind and more effective control over your network’s security, empowering you to manage complex challenges with greater efficiency.

We encourage you to log into your Control Panel today, explore the new Dashboards categories, and use the data to strengthen your threat detection and response strategies.

Your proactive security journey just got a powerful upgrade.