Skip to content

Risk-Based Authentication: Implementation Strategies and Best Practices

Learn how AI-powered, real-time session monitoring helps stop insider threats and privileged attacks before they escalate.

In this guide, you’ll learn:

  • Why legacy session monitoring isn’t enough
  • How advanced Privileged Session Management (PSM) works in real time
  • What to look for in modern PSM tools
  • How AI-driven session analysis reduces risk
  • Where advanced PSM delivers the most value

Picture this: It’s 3:12 a.m., and a compromised payroll admin’s account just got used in Kyiv…a location this employee has never visited. The attacker breezed past outdated MFA, having obtained the one-time code during a phishing attempt last week. Sensitive salary data vanishes, new direct-deposit details queue up, and it’s all discovered 194 days later (the average time it takes to detect a breach, according to IBM), long after unapproved payouts drain your budget. 

Incidents like this aren’t edge cases; they’ve become the norm. Credential-based attacks jumped 71 percent in 2024, and 44 percent of employees still reuse passwords across personal and corporate accounts. Static defenses can’t keep up. They treat every login exactly the same, no matter where, when, or how it happens, leaving you with a painful dilemma: add more friction (and watch support tickets spike) or accept higher risk.

Risk-Based Authentication (RBA) ends that trade-off. Instead of forcing blanket MFA policies, RBA evaluates each login in real time and tailors the challenge to the actual threat level. Legitimate users pass through while suspicious logins face step-up verification or are blocked outright. 

In this article, we’ll break down everything you need to launch Risk-Based Authentication with confidence. 

What is Risk-Based Authentication (RBA)?

Risk-Based Authentication (RBA) is a smarter way to verify user logins. Instead of handling every single sign-in with identical security challenges, an RBA engine decides on the fly whether you’re likely to be who you claim. 

Many organizations already collect similar contextual telemetry inside identity or privileged-access tools. For instance, Segura’s PAM platform records device posture and session metadata every time an admin checks out a credential. RBA simply brings that context to the forefront of the login decision.

Sometimes you’ll see RBA called “adaptive authentication,” but the principle remains the same: weigh each login’s context and act accordingly. Although RBA mainly focuses on the time of sign-in, many solutions keep watch for suspicious mid-session changes, tagging potential anomalies before they lead to a breach.

How does Risk-Based Authentication work?

RBA works by assessing real-time contextual data and scoring how likely it is that a login attempt is genuine. Then it responds based on that risk. 

The process involves multiple stages:

Contextual data collection

As soon as a user enters their primary credentials, the system starts gathering contextual information. Here are a few factors that might get collected. 

Risk scoring

Those signals go into a smart engine, often powered by machine learning, which then figures out whether the login attempt is risky. Low scores mean “business as usual,” while high scores indicate red alerts that can get blocked or challenged.

Adaptive response

Depending on the score, the RBA system decides how to react.

  • Low risk: Primary credentials are accepted, and the user proceeds with minimal friction.
  • Medium risk: RBA prompts a one-time code or another step-up challenge. 
  • High risk: Access is rejected or needs stringent verification before proceeding.  

Some advanced RBA deployments also watch how users behave during sessions. If the behavior suddenly becomes suspicious, the system might require the user to reauthenticate.

Key benefits of implementing RBA

Implementing RBA is far more than an incremental security improvement. It strengthens your security posture while improving the login experience.

  • Enhanced Security Against Account Compromise: By analyzing context in real time, RBA catches suspicious behavior that static defenses would miss, cutting down on phishing and brute-force break-ins. Many organizations report around 50% fewer identity-related breaches with RBA.
  • Frictionless User Experience: The biggest advantage of RBA is it challenges people only when necessary. Instead of an MFA prompt for every single login, only 8 to 10% of sign-ins need step-up factors – helping reduce MFA fatigue.
  • Operational Efficiency: This means cost savings in both support tickets and security responses. When RBA hooks into a PAM solution like Segura, privileged sessions inherit risk scores automatically, so help-desk staff spend less time managing emergency ‘break-glass’ access (emergency override access) and security teams can focus on actual threats.
  • Compliance Support: RBA supports compliance with frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS by demonstrating adaptive, risk-aware security. NIST’s digital identity guidelines explicitly call out RBA as a recommended approach.
  • Secure Remote Work: RBA evaluates logins based on real-time context rather than static assumptions about device or location, making it ideal for hybrid work and BYOD environments.

Strategic planning for RBA implementation

Deploying RBA requires careful planning and clear organizational alignment. Effective RBA implementations start with clearly defined objectives, thoughtful assessment of organizational readiness, and careful solution selection. 

Here’s how to structure your strategy to ensure your RBA deployment is successful.

Defining objectives, scope, and use cases

Begin by clearly articulating what you want to achieve with RBA. Specific objectives might include reducing account takeover incidents, improving login experience, protecting high-value applications, or meeting compliance requirements. 

Define measurable goals like “Reduce fraudulent account access by 80%” or “Maintain step-up challenges under 5% of logins.”

Next, determine implementation scope. Will RBA be rolled out for workforce logins, customer applications, or both? Which authentication flows should incorporate risk evaluation? Prioritize areas of highest risk or value, such as privileged accounts and remote access portals. For each use case, define authentication policies in business terms, creating scenario-based requirements that will later translate to technical rules.

Assessing organizational readiness

Is your organization ready for RBA? Evaluate based on the following factors: 

Data readiness: RBA requires contextual data points like device information, geolocation, and login history. Assess whether your infrastructure captures these signals and maintains sufficient historical data to establish baselines.

Technical infrastructure: Review your authentication architecture, including identity providers, VPN solutions, and application authentication flows. Many modern IAM platforms have built-in RBA capabilities or APIs for integration. Determine whether you’ll leverage existing features or need to integrate third-party solutions.

Organizational readiness: Consider the human factor. Do you have the expertise to manage an RBA system? Ensure stakeholder buy-in from leadership, security operations, and IT support teams who will handle alerts and support cases related to RBA.

Choosing the right RBA solution

No single RBA tool fits all use cases. Some organizations might just flip on RBA in their existing IAM suite, while others may need a standalone engine for advanced correlation and machine learning capabilities.  

Here are some factors that can help you decide what’s the right fit for your organization: 

Integration capabilities

Will this plug easily into your current identity provider? If you already run Segura for privileged access, see whether your RBA engine can consume its session telemetry via API. 

Risk model sophistication

Do you want a rule-based approach that you can manually tweak, or do you prefer a black-box ML system that “just works”? 

Policy flexibility

Make sure you can craft specific rules for different user groups. 

User experience

Which MFA forms do you want to offer? Push notifications, tokens, biometrics, or FIDO2 keys?  

Scalability and performance

Check that your RBA solution can handle peak workloads without slowing user logins.

Step-by-step implementation guide

Think of RBA as a strategic shift rather than just another tacked-on security feature. It can genuinely improve your security posture…but only if you plan carefully and feed it good data.

Phase 1: Data collection & integration

Imagine your authentication system as a doorkeeper who needs to quickly evaluate each visitor. Without proper information, even the most vigilant guard makes poor decisions. 

Your first mission is to give your system the right signals to interpret.

Integrate RBA into authentication flow:  If your existing IAM supports conditional access or risk evaluation, enable those. Otherwise, configure APIs to call a standalone RBA engine at login.  

Set up data feeds: Ensure the system receives all relevant context signals. Connect to directories for user attributes, device management solutions for device health, and threat intelligence feeds if applicable. For browser-based logins, implement JavaScript for device fingerprinting. Configure any additional integrations needed for geolocation or IP reputation services.

Don’t forget privileged credentials: Integrating Segura’s audit stream with the RBA engine allows you to flag logins that immediately pivot to high-risk commands.

Establish baseline monitoring: Run the RBA engine in a quiet mode for a week or two, gathering risk scores without enforcing them. This helps you see normal versus abnormal behavior before you start challenging users.  

Configure high availability: Decide if you fail-open (grant login if the RBA service is down) or fail-closed (block everyone if risk checks fail). Each option has trade-offs between user impact and security.

Phase 2: Policy definition & configuration

Now it’s time to determine how your system interprets the signals it receives. This isn’t merely about technical configuration. It’s about encoding your organization’s security philosophy into actionable rules.

Define risk scoring rules: Configure how the system should assess risk factors based on your baseline data and organizational priorities. 

For example, you might set rules like “IP address from new country AND new device adds +30 risk” or “Executive group logins from outside headquarters are at least medium risk.” 

Review default weightings and adjust to fit your environment, perhaps lowering geolocation significance for users who travel frequently.

Set risk thresholds: Decide how to categorize low, medium, and high risk. If you set the bar too high, everyone gets challenged. If you set it too low, you may allow suspicious logins. 

Configure adaptive responses: Map each risk level to specific actions. 

Typically, you’d: 

  • Allow low-risk logins with primary credentials only. 
  • Require step-up authentication for medium risk.
  • Block or impose stringent verification for high risk. 

Set up the step-up mechanisms, whether push notifications, OTP codes, or biometric verification.

Handle special cases: Implement exception rules for specific scenarios, perhaps all privileged account logins require MFA regardless of risk, or certain service accounts need alternative approaches. 

Configure handling for new users with no historical baseline, and establish procedures for planned exceptions like business travel.

Define user messaging: Present clear messages like “We need additional verification” rather than cryptic error codes. Transparent comms help users understand increased security steps.

Phase 3: User behavior modeling & tuning

Security systems protect humans, but are often defeated by human behavior. This phase is where your RBA implementation learns to distinguish between unusual but legitimate access and actual threats.

Conduct pilot rollout: Before you deploy RBA across the organization, enable full RBA (with challenges) for a controlled group, perhaps the IT department or a volunteer pilot team. 

This limited scope allows you to observe how the system performs with real users while minimizing potential disruption. Pay close attention to how many logins trigger MFA, how well users understand the prompts, and whether any genuine security events are detected.

Refine user behavior models: If your solution uses machine learning, allow time for the system to learn normal patterns for each user. 

During this period, encourage pilot users to follow their typical login routines so the system can establish accurate baselines. As normal behavior is modeled, risk scores for routine logins should decrease.

Tune based on feedback: Analyze both quantitative data and qualitative feedback to refine your configuration. If legitimate logins frequently trigger medium-risk responses, investigate why; perhaps certain factors need adjustment. 

For example, if developers regularly use different machines, device novelty shouldn’t be heavily penalized for that group. Conversely, if suspicious attempts aren’t properly flagged, strengthen relevant factors.

Address false positives/negatives: Examine any security incidents that RBA should have detected but didn’t, and incorporate those lessons into your model. Similarly, identify and address patterns causing unnecessary challenges for specific user groups.

Document and communicate: Keep an internal knowledge base with current risk rules and known behaviors. Prepare communication material explaining the new authentication approach and set appropriate expectations before broader rollout.

Phase 4: Testing, rollout & monitoring

With a refined configuration and lessons from your pilot internalized, you’re ready to expand protection across your organization. 

Implement phased rollout: Using insights from the pilot, gradually expand RBA enforcement, perhaps department by department or application by application. Monitor each expansion phase for unexpected issues before proceeding to the next group. 

Conduct comprehensive testing: Before fully enabling RBA for critical services, test various scenarios: normal logins, clearly risky attempts, and edge cases. Verify that step-up prompts work correctly across all platforms, test failure cases and recovery procedures, and validate administrative functions like override capabilities and logging.

Establish monitoring and alerting: Create dashboards tracking key metrics: authentication volumes, risk distributions, challenge rates, and block events. Configure alerts for potential attack patterns (multiple high-risk attempts at one account) or system issues (sudden changes in risk distribution). Integrate RBA logs with your SIEM for correlation with other security events.

Develop incident procedures: Create clear protocols for handling RBA-related events. Define how support staff should verify identity when legitimate users are blocked, and establish security team responses when suspicious access attempts are detected. Incorporate RBA signals into your broader security incident response workflow.

Implement continuous improvement: Schedule regular reviews of RBA performance, using metrics to identify opportunities for refinement. As business conditions evolve (work patterns change, new threats emerge), adjust policies accordingly. When expanding to new applications or user groups, repeat the tuning process for those contexts.

RBA implementation best practices

A successful RBA rollout doesn’t end with deployment. It requires ongoing refinement and proactive management to remain effective against evolving threats. 

Below are some best practices drawn from organizations that have successfully embedded RBA into their security DNA.

Establish clear metrics: Define and track KPIs for both security (prevented breaches, blocked suspicious attempts) and user experience (challenge rates, login success). Set target ranges to guide ongoing tuning.

Feed rich data sources: You’ll get better detection if you keep feeding your RBA engine updated intelligence about user roles, device posture, and potential threat sources.  

Continuously tune the system: RBA is not “set-and-forget” security. Regularly review performance metrics and adjust policies as threat landscapes and business conditions evolve. Simulate attack scenarios to verify effectiveness, and incorporate feedback from security incidents to strengthen detection capabilities.

Layer with other controls: Complement RBA with a broader security mesh, like mandatory MFA for admin accounts or integration with Zero Trust. RBA signals can feed a Zero Trust model, stepping up scrutiny whenever something looks off.  

Ensure transparency: Let employees know they may see extra prompts if their login behavior changes, to keep them from feeling blindsided. Establish straightforward support processes for when legitimate users encounter difficulties.

Handle exceptions gracefully: Create procedures for special situations like business travel or temporary device changes. Implement time-bound exceptions with appropriate approvals rather than permanent bypasses. Document all exceptions and review them periodically to prevent security gaps.

Protect privacy: Don’t forget compliance around data minimization and retention. Device and location logs can be sensitive, so enforce suitable retention schedules and encryption.

How to integrate RBA into your security ecosystem

Risk-Based Authentication isn’t a standalone solution. It thrives when fully integrated into your broader security ecosystem. 

For example, Segura’s just-in-time session brokering can pass a ‘privileged-session’ flag to your RBA policy, automatically raising the risk floor before the admin even reaches the vault.

Identity and Access Management (IAM): Implement RBA at the IAM level so all federated applications benefit from contextual risk assessment. When using Single Sign-On, enable RBA in the SSO flow to provide consistent protection across connected applications. Exchange identity information bidirectionally, user status changes from IAM should influence RBA policies, while RBA risk signals can trigger IAM actions like forced password resets.

Zero Trust Architecture: Position RBA as a key component of Zero Trust by providing continuous, context-aware identity verification. Integrate with ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access) solutions to combine device posture and identity risk into unified access decisions. Configure RBA to re-evaluate sessions periodically, aligning with the “never trust, always verify” principle by challenging users when context changes significantly during active sessions.

Privileged Access Management (PAM): Apply enhanced RBA scrutiny to privileged operations. When administrators access sensitive systems or retrieve credentials from vaults, contextual risk assessment can identify unusual access patterns that might indicate compromise. Configure stricter thresholds for admin accounts, potentially requiring additional verification or approval for high-risk privileged sessions.

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) and SOAR: Feed RBA events to your SIEM for correlation with other security signals. Configure alerts when multiple high-risk login attempts occur across different accounts from the same source, potentially indicating coordinated attacks. Integrate with SOAR platforms to automate responses, for example, triggering account lockouts or security team notifications when suspicious patterns emerge. Create bidirectional integration where SIEM/UEBA insights about unusual user behavior can influence risk scores for subsequent authentication attempts.

Customer Identity and Fraud Systems: For consumer-facing applications, integrate RBA with fraud detection platforms to create a unified risk view. Combine authentication context with transaction patterns so suspicious account behavior (like unusual purchases or profile changes) can trigger step-up challenges before sensitive operations complete.

The future of Risk-Based Authentication

RBA’s going to keep evolving as AI tools get smarter and more embedded in authentication systems. With machine learning becoming sharper at picking out unusual activity, we’ll likely see fewer false alarms interrupting legitimate users. Take behavioral biometrics, for instance, tracking nuanced user habits like typing speed or subtle mouse gestures could soon quietly double-check identities behind the scenes throughout a user’s session.

One shift worth keeping track of is real-time threat intelligence sharing, where organizations swap security signals in the moment. Think of it like a neighborhood watch – when compromised passwords turn up in leaked databases or suspicious activity is spotted elsewhere, organizations can immediately tighten their own authentication policies in response. It’s a bit like how banks quickly alert each other to prevent fraud when someone tries using a stolen credit card.

We’re probably heading into an era where the clear-cut distinction between that initial login check and continuous security monitoring starts to fade. Instead of just validating a user once at sign-in, risk assessment will likely follow the user during their entire interaction, adjusting the trust level based on device data, sensor inputs, and session behavior. So, rather than giving users a free pass post-login, organizations will continuously re-confirm their identity, making security more fluid and dynamic.

Ultimately, expect systems themselves to become more dynamic, adjusting authentication factors on the fly depending on the exact context and risk profile of each transaction. Imagine you’re logging in from a coffee shop’s Wi-Fi for the first time. In a situation like this, RBA might prompt additional verification automatically, even if you’re using a familiar security key or fingerprint.

Don’t wait for a breach – take action today

Risk-Based Authentication represents a fundamental shift from static checkpoints to intelligent, adaptive security. By adopting RBA, your organization can significantly reduce the risk of credential-based threats, streamline user experience, and eliminate the outdated trade-off between security and usability.

But effective RBA doesn’t happen by accident – it requires the right tools and a trusted partner. Segura simplifies this transition with robust, ready-to-implement features like real-time session monitoring, contextual policy controls, and Continuous Identification: a built-in capability that dynamically validates user identity throughout the session. These features integrate seamlessly with your existing systems to deliver stronger security without added friction.

About Segura®
Segura® strive to ensure the sovereignty of companies over actions and privileged information. To this end, we work against data theft through traceability of administrator actions on networks, servers, databases and a multitude of devices. In addition, we pursue compliance with auditing requirements and the most demanding standards, including PCI DSS, Sarbanes-Oxley, ISO 27001 and HIPAA.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

GigaOm Again Names Scale Computing a Leader in Full-Stack Edge Deployments

Company Recognized as Leader and Fast-Mover in the GigaOm Radar Report for the Second Consecutive Year

INDIANAPOLIS – July 8, 2025 – Scale Computing, a market leader in edge computing, virtualization, and hyperconverged solutions, today announced that GigaOm has named the company a Leader in the GigaOm Radar Report for Full-Stack Edge Deployments. For the second consecutive year, Scale Computing is positioned in the inner-most Leader ring, and has been recognized as a Fast Mover, in the Maturity/Platform Play quadrant of the Radar chart. The report plots vendor solutions across a series of concentric rings, with those closer to the center judged to be of higher overall value.

The demands of a digital world and for near-real-time response are driving the need for more applications to run outside the cloud or data center, in distributed locations that are closer to where they are used by people, devices, and IoT technologies. Full-stack edge computing deployments deliver a cloud-like experience to these edge locations, which are otherwise difficult to manage at scale. Cloud-managed and cloud-connected, these hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solutions provide all the necessary tools to run applications at customers’ preferred locations for local data collection and processing.

“Scale Computing offers a full-stack edge solution that delivers virtualization, servers, storage, backup, disaster recovery, and fleet management, all in a single, easy-to-manage platform that scales seamlessly and puts computing power at the edge of the network, where organizations need it most,” said Jeff Ready, CEO and co-founder of Scale Computing. “As the future of IT moves rapidly to the edge, Scale Computing is honored to once again be named a Leader in the GigaOm Radar report for Full-Stack Edge Deployments. We’re proud to empower businesses globally with solutions that are easy to use, easy to manage, and easy to deploy—from branch offices to factory floors to distributed retail locations. For organizations looking to scale their Edge AI capabilities, SC//Platform offers a future-proof solution that integrates seamlessly with existing infrastructure, simplifying the complexities of edge AI adoption and enabling enterprises to harness the full potential of AI-driven operations at the edge.”

Scale Computing Platform (SC//Platform) is recognized for bringing together simplicity and scalability in a single offering to replace existing IT infrastructure, providing high availability for running workloads and enabling enterprises to run applications and process data at the edge of their networks. As more enterprises transition to agentic AI-driven operations, SC//Platform’s integrated autonomous management, decentralized AI processing, and AI-driven optimization capabilities empower organizations to deploy AI at the edge with confidence, ensuring resilience, adaptability, and operational simplicity.

Together with its companion Key Criteria report, GigaOm’s Radar Report provides an overview of the market, identifies leading full-stack edge deployment offerings, and helps decision-makers evaluate solutions to make more informed investment decisions. The new report examines 16 of the top solutions and dives into what technology needs and best practices should be considered when looking at full-stack edge deployments. Scale Computing scored well on a number of decision criteria, including:

  • Cloud-like management: Scale Computing HyperCore (SC//HyperCore), powered by the Autonomous Infrastructure Management Engine (AIME), handles day-to-day administrative and maintenance tasks automatically, monitors the system for security, hardware, and software errors, and remediates errors where possible.
  • Plug-and-play provisioning: SC//HyperCore enables seamless programmatic deployment of containers.
  • Visibility and monitoring: Scale Computing Fleet Manager (SC//Fleet Manager), a cloud-hosted monitoring and management tool built for hyperconverged edge computing infrastructure at scale, can monitor fleets from one to 50,000 SC//HyperCore-based clusters, empowering administrators to centrally configure clusters of edge computing infrastructure prior to nodes arriving on-premises with cloud-like simplicity.

To learn more about Scale Computing and view a complimentary copy of the GigOm Radar Report for Full-Stack Edge Deployments, please visit scalecomputing.com/landing-pages/gigaom-radar.

 

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Scale Computing 
Scale Computing is a leader in edge computing, virtualization, and hyperconverged solutions. Scale Computing HC3 software eliminates the need for traditional virtualization software, disaster recovery software, servers, and shared storage, replacing these with a fully integrated, highly available system for running applications. Using patented HyperCore™ technology, the HC3 self-healing platform automatically identifies, mitigates, and corrects infrastructure problems in real-time, enabling applications to achieve maximum uptime. When ease-of-use, high availability, and TCO matter, Scale Computing HC3 is the ideal infrastructure platform. Read what our customers have to say on Gartner Peer Insights, Spiceworks, TechValidate and TrustRadius.

ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2: What’s the difference?

Summary: ISO 27001 or SOC 2? Discover which fits your business best, compare key differences, and see how NordLayer supports both compliance standards.

ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2: Which compliance standard is better for your organization? This question often comes up when companies need to prove they take data security seriously, especially in fast-growing or highly regulated industries.

Both SOC 2 and ISO 27001 offer trusted frameworks for protecting sensitive information, but they take different paths to get there.

SOC 2 specifies criteria for how companies should manage controls to protect customer data from unauthorized access, cybersecurity incidents, and other risks. ISO 27001 goes deeper, providing a framework for implementing an end-to-end security system that covers people, technologies, and processes.

Not sure which one fits your business best? You’re not alone. In this guide, we’ll compare ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2, how they differ, what they have in common, and how to choose the right security compliance standard for your organization.

What is ISO 27001?

ISO 27001 is a global standard for managing information security. Created by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission
(IEC) outlines how to build a strong information security management system (ISMS). It addresses areas such as risk assessment, access control, and incident response.

The framework categorizes its controls into four key themes: organizational, people, operational, and technological. If your business handles customer data, ISO 27001 demonstrates that you have structured, reliable systems that help keep that information safe.

To get ISO 27001 certification, an accredited third-party auditor must confirm that you meet all the compliance requirements. This certification is a good fit for companies that want to build trust, meet regulatory expectations, and protect sensitive information.

Comparison table of ISO 27001 and SOC 2

What is SOC 2?

SOC 2 stands for Systems and Organization Controls 2. It’s a security compliance standard created by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) to help companies keep customer data safer from data breaches, unauthorized access, and other cyber threats.

A SOC 2 report proves your company’s security measures are effective. It’s like a trust badge that shows you handle, process, and store customers’ data responsibly and securely.

Who benefits from a SOC 2 report?

  • Cloud service providers
  • SaaS companies
  • Digital financial companies
  • Healthcare organizations

If you’re in one of these industries, having SOC 2 compliance will give you a competitive edge.

ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2: Key differences

One big difference between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 is how compliance is verified. ISO 27001 gives you an official certification. Pass the requirements, and you’re certified—simple as that.

SOC 2 works a bit differently. You don’t get a certificate. Instead, an independent auditor writes a SOC 2 attestation report, giving their expert opinion on whether you meet the SOC 2 compliance criteria.

So, how do ISO 27001 and SOC 2 differ? Both certification and attestation involve a deep dive by an external auditor. Certification feels more formal, but in some industries, ISO 27001 carries more weight.

Here is a summary of the main differences between SOC 2 and ISO 27001:

 

SOC 2

ISO 27001

Issuing/ standard body

ISO/IEC ANSI-ASQ

National Accreditation Board (ANAB)

Presentation

An attestation that results in a detailed report of your security controls

A certification that shows you’ve passed the ISO 27001 audit

Target market

United States

International

Core requirements

Trust Service Criteria:
Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, And Privacy

Clauses 4-10 of the framework, including the ISMS scope, statement of applicability, risk management, and continual improvement

Audit results

SOC 2 attestation report, made available only under NDA

SOC 2 reports are valid for 12 months and require a new SOC 2 every year

ISO report that includes a 1-page certification that can be made public

Recertification is required after 3 years

Timeline

1–4 months for the Type I report and 6–12 months for the Type II report

Approx. 3–12 months

Cost

Varies by the size and complexity of an organization

Typically $10–60k

Varies by the size and complexity of an organization

Typically $10–25k

Let’s take a closer look at ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2 to understand them better.

Compliance requirements

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 share quite a few security controls, but they don’t ask for the same level of implementation.

Both standards say you need to apply internal controls that are relevant to your business. But ISO 27001 tends to be stricter. You’ll need to meet more criteria and cover a broader set of controls to be fully ISO 27001 compliant.

SOC 2 is a bit more flexible. It’s based on five Trust Services Criteria—but only one (Security) is required in every SOC 2 report. The other four (Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, and Privacy) are optional, depending on what your company does.

Location: Which standard do your customers expect?

Both SOC 2 attestation and ISO 27001 certification are respected in the security and technology world, but where you do business can influence which one you need.

If your clients are in North America, SOC 2 is usually the go-to. It’s the standard most U.S. and Canadian companies expect.

On the other hand, ISO 27001 is more common internationally. So if you’re working with customers in Europe, Asia, or other global markets, ISO 27001 is likely the better fit.

Timeline: How long does it take to get compliant?

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 differ not only in what they ask of you but also in the amount of time it takes to complete.

 

ISO 27001

SOC 2 Type 1

SOC 2 Type 2

Timeline

6-12 months

1-4 months

3-12 months

What does it involve?

Auditors review your documentation and check your ISMS to ensure it complies with ISO 27001

Auditors look at your security controls at a single point in time

Auditors review your security controls over 3-12 months to see how they work in practice

So, if your organization needs to demonstrate compliance quickly, SOC 2 Type 1 offers a faster path. However, for clients who require long-term assurance of your security practices, SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 may provide the depth and credibility they expect.

Audit process: What to expect with ISO 27001 vs. SOC 2

Both ISO 27001 and SOC 2 follow a structured process. You’ll need to define your security goals, run a gap analysis, implement key controls, collect documentation, and set up a system for ongoing improvement.

The difference lies in who audits you.

  • ISO 27001 requires an accredited certification body to certify your compliance.
  • SOC 2 must be audited by a licensed CPA firm.

Renewal timelines also differ:

  • SOC 2 Type 2 reports are valid for 12 months, typically renewed every year.
  • ISO 27001 certificates last for three years, with annual surveillance audits and a full recertification audit in year three.
ISO 27001 and SOC 2: More in common than you think

SOC 2 and ISO 27001 focus on core principles like data security, confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Both require organizations to implement strong security measures and undergo independent audits to prove it. In fact, there’s up to 80% overlap between the two frameworks, so working toward one puts you well on the way to meeting the other.

While neither is mandatory, getting certified or attested shows clients and partners that your data protection practices are trustworthy.

Feature

ISO 27001 & SOC 2 similarities

Focus

Protecting data security, confidentiality, integrity, and availability

Framework type

Risk-based approach to managing information security

Security controls

Require the implementation of internal controls and policies

Audit requirement

Independent third-party audit or assessment

Outcome

Demonstrates trust and security posture to clients

ISO 27001 and SOC 2: Which one is right for you?

Choosing between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 depends on your goals, clients, and the maturity of your current information security setup. Both standards help service organizations demonstrate strong, reliable security practices, and each is designed to meet different business needs.

When to choose ISO 27001

Go with ISO 27001 if you’re building an information security management system (ISMS) from the ground up. This standard is globally recognized, making it ideal if you work with international clients or want to show that your data protection measures meet global expectations.

  • It’s a great fit for organizations looking for a structured, long-term approach to security.
  • Stakeholders and partners often view ISO 27001 certification as a strong signal of trust.
  • It’s more rigorous and requires more resources, but it builds a robust foundation.

When to choose SOC 2

SOC 2 is a better option if your organization already has an ISMS and wants to validate its controls. It’s especially relevant for service organizations that operate primarily in North America.

  • SOC 2 offers more flexibility, letting you focus audits on specific Trust Services Criteria.
  • It’s a lighter, faster, and often more cost-effective route for companies that want tailored insights into their information security practices.
  • It’s a strong choice if you need to meet client demands without committing to global certification yet.

When to choose both

For some organizations, the best answer is both.

Use ISO 27001 to establish a robust, globally recognized information security management system. Once that’s in place, conduct regular SOC 2 audits to keep improving and get detailed feedback on how well your controls work.

Together, ISO 27001 and SOC 2 give you full-spectrum credibility, offering both the structured foundation and ongoing validation your clients expect, no matter where they are. It’s a smart move for growing companies that take data protection seriously and want to stay competitive in multiple markets.

Choosing between ISO 27001 and SOC 2 isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision. It really depends on your goals, resources, and where your clients are.

 

How NordLayer helps you stay ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliant

Whether you’re building an ISMS from scratch or fine-tuning existing controls, NordLayer supports your compliance journey. We have security solutions to meet both compliance standards.

  • Access controls: Network Access Control (NAC) solutions like Cloud Firewall and Device Posture Security help manage access to sensitive data, ensuring that only authorized users and devices can access your network.
  • Encryption: NordLayer encrypts traffic in transit using the AES-256 and ChaCha20 algorithms to help you meet the data security standards required by both frameworks.
  • Secure access to data in the cloud: Whether you’re using AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Entra ID, we help secure your cloud environments with Site-to-Site network connectors and SaaS security solutions.
  • Network visibility: With event logging, real-time monitoring, and device posture monitoring, NordLayer helps you monitor network access and maintain audit logs for up to 60 days.
  • Threat prevention: NordLayer’s Threat prevention features help restrict access to untrusted websites and users, detect and stop malicious downloads, and prevent potentially harmful malware or other cyber threats from infecting your devices.

NordLayer is designed for modern, fast-growing organizations that want flexibility without sacrificing control. Whether you’re pursuing ISO 27001, SOC 2, or both, we support your compliance journey.

Contact our sales team to find out how NordLayer can help you achieve your goals.

ISO 2700 vs. SOC 2: Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 vs. ISO 27001: Which makes more sense for your business?

SOC 2 is great if you work mostly with U.S. clients and want a flexible audit. ISO 27001 is better for global businesses needing a structured security system. Pick the one that fits your goals, or go for both.

Can a company become ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliant at the same time?

Yes, it can. These two security standards share a lot, especially when it comes to information security controls and data protection. Combining the processes can save time, reduce duplicated effort, and give your business a stronger, more unified approach to service organization security.

When might ISO 27001 not be enough?

ISO 27001 may fall short if clients specifically require a SOC 2 report, or if you need detailed, customer-facing proof of control performance over time. In U.S. markets, SOC 2 often holds greater practical relevance.

How to achieve SOC 2 and ISO 27001 compliance?

Start by defining your security goals, conducting a gap analysis, and implementing required controls. For ISO 27001, work with an accredited certification body; for SOC 2, use a licensed CPA firm. Maintain continuous monitoring and documentation.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and not legal advice. Use it at your own risk and consult a licensed professional for legal matters. Content may not be up-to-date or applicable to your jurisdiction and is subject to change without notice.

 

About NordLayer
NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses – from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security.

The web has become a chaotic space where safety and trust have been compromised by cybercrime and data protection issues. Therefore, our team has a global mission to shape a more trusted and peaceful online future for people everywhere.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

×