Skip to content

Supernet: What it is and what it is for?

From now on, let us add “Supernet” into our vocabulary. Learn more!

A set of computers and/or computer equipment connected to each other, and that can exchange data and information, all of those make up a network. The Internet is the network of networks. We could even think that the Internet is the “Supernet”, but we have to tread carefully when using frequently debated terms in computing… For that reason, today, we bring to the fore the term “Supernet” (or Supernetwork), of course always taking an approach from a monitoring perspective.

* Warning: what I write below is my way of looking at things from a practical and sincere point of view. This article only endorses me and, in any case, this entry should be read taking into account the learning approach, it does not intend to be official in any way. That said, let’s start from the basics, which is not the same as starting from scratch.

Terms: Supernet and Supernetting

If we have a network and we buy a new computer, we say that “we add it to a network.” If we have a supernet, then “we add it to a supernet.” We even have a specific verb for it. It is very common to use the term Supernetting; however the following terms are also valid (but less used):

  • Prefix aggregation
  • Route aggregation
  • Route summarization

If we get even more specific, technically we will find differences but for the purposes of this post we will deal with it the same way… Do you think it is daring on my part? Well, there is more!

Request for comments

Although we can go a lot further back in time, the Internet was born in the United States of America, originally called Arpanet, in the late 1960s. A technological predecessor could be the landline from which many of the concepts are born, used when planning the “network of networks”. In fact, the wiring itself, the colors that identify the pairs, are very similar, at a physical or hardware level. This includes the similarities in switched connections (or circuit switching). But, obviously, the Internet and data transport in a digital way ended up completely absorbing telephony.

But the Internet needed more than the physical and conceptual foundation or sustenance of the great American telephone companies. Moreover, October 1969 is marked as the birth of the Internet since the first connection between two computers was made… And it was simply that, since it was not yet a common computer network.

The Internet was born, in my opinion, when pioneer Dr. Steve D. Crocker published the first issue of Request for Comment (RFC) on April 7, 1969. In Issue 6 (RFC 6), Steve Crocker recounts his conversation with Bob Kahn about code conversion for data exchange. RFC 11 publishes the connection implementation in the FAT operating system (yes, that’s what it was called), and I fervently believe that this, published in August 1969, is what enabled the feat performed in October of that same year.

Based on this knowledge base, the RFCs were born: gathering a group of people in their twenties who moved among different universities sharing knowledge and cementing concepts, something that we now do by email… In fact, RFC 733 (1977) outlines this technology and the standard for the email is published in RFC 822 (year 1982).

RFCs grew decade after decade: in 1992, RFC 1338 “Supernetting: an Address Assignment and Aggregation Strategy” was published for information purposes. Yes, at first the supernet was just a mere advertisement, not a protocol, and not even a standard.

Just the following year, in 1993, RFC 1518 “breaks” the paradigm of networks by classes. While class A networks allow millions of IP addresses, the next step – class B networks – only allowed 65 thousand IP addresses: between the two of them the “waste” of IP addresses is very high.

For that reason, the Classless Inter-Domain Routing (better known as CIDR) was born, which is an extension of the original IPv4 addressing system that allows more efficient address allocation. The original class-based method used fixed fields for network identifiers, which was wasteful as I said earlier: most organizations that are assigned those addresses (class A and class B networks) never intended to put so many devices on the Internet.

As additional information, this is the origin of CIDR notation, the suffix that accompanies an IP address (there are 32 bits in an IPv4 address, four octets separated by periods) and that allows describing or narrowing down a range of them. For example, for /20 it allows 4096 IP addresses, for /21 2048 IP addresses and so on, as well as all the way around (all powers of base 2, this is important for a supernet as we will see later). All these numbers can be obtained using the IP address calculator included in Pandora FMS. You may also find many of these calculators online, each with its own style, shapes and colors to present the same data.

Flexible like Pandora FMS

CIDR thus changed the fixed fields to variable length fields and this allowed to assign IP addresses better, and in a more refined way. CIDR IP addresses include a number that indicates how the address is divided between networks and hosts.

For example, in the CIDR address 201.249.0.0/19 the /19 indicates that the first 19 bits are used for the identification of the network and the remaining 13 are used for host identification.

The main purpose of a supernet is to decrease the size of the route table of routers. For example, instead of a router having 8 individual routes, it may have a single route aggregated from these 8 individual routes. This saves memory and processing resources on the routing devices, thus requiring less space to store their route table and less processing power to search the route table. It also provides stability in networks because fluctuations can be isolated, that is, in one part of the network they do not spread to all parts of the network.

Supernetting and Pandora FMS

From Pandora FMS version NG 731 IPAM was included (abbreviation of Internet Protocol Address Management) which allows to manage, discover, diagnose and monitor hundreds of IP addresses.

Within this feature, the supernet, subnets and even virtual private networks (VLAN) are included, all integrated, with the option to export data in CSV files. Unlike creating VLANs, we can only create supernets manually using IPAM. For that, you have to configure, with the necessary parameters, each of the supernets that you want to have, and later add networks already managed with IPAM that may belong to a VLAN. Although it is a manual process from version NG 758, it includes the ability to quickly addy our data from files in CSV format.

To finish off this post, let’s see what the rules that operate a supernet are.

Supernet Rules

Apart from good practices in network configuration, the established rules must always be followed and enforced to avoid chaos reigning.
The rules for creating supernets are as follows:

  • Networks must be contiguous or sequential.
  • The number of networks to add must be a multiple of two or “base two”.
  • And the rule that is somewhat more complicated: compare the value of the first octet not common from the first block of IP addresses (the smallest) of the list of networks to add against the number of networks to add (see previous point). The value of the first non-common octet must be zero or a multiple of the number of networks to be added.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About PandoraFMS
Pandora FMS is a flexible monitoring system, capable of monitoring devices, infrastructures, applications, services and business processes.
Of course, one of the things that Pandora FMS can control is the hard disks of your computers.

Integrate IBM QRadar SIEM with SCADAfence For Complete OT Visibility

CISOs and security teams face an uphill battle when it comes to detecting and mitigating ever more frequent and sophisticated cyber threats, especially in OT environments.

Cyber attackers are learning new tactics, getting more creative, and are becoming more relentless than ever to exploit industrial organizations. As seen in the Oldsmar water system attack and the Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack, adversaries are targeting IT and OT environments to inflict damage on organizations that can affect the daily lives of civilians.

Considering the evolving and ever-expanding threat landscape,security and incident response teams might be feeling lost at times when defending their OT networks. Even more so with the recent increasing convergence of IT and operational technology (OT) threats, industrial organizations are seeking new practices on how to leverage their existing IT security stack to address the new cyber threats that are targeting OT environments.

This is where SCADAfence and IBM QRadar have partnered together to create a joint integration to tackle OT security challenges. Now security teams who are using IBM QRadar can be provided with the required visibility and security for adopting advanced Industrial IoT and OT technologies. This new integration with QRadar allows users to simply integrate alerts from the SCADAfence Platform to their QRadar feed, as well as viewing it in a dedicated SCADAfence dashboard.

QRadar SCADAFence Dashboard

Diagram 01. The SCADAfence & IBM QRadar integration dashboard

Many industrial organizations count on IBM Security QRadar, an intelligent SIEM, to provide actionable threat intelligence to help detect and respond to security incidents that need to be mitigated. SCADAfence’s integration with IBM QRadar allows our joint customers to capitalize further on their current security stack, so they can have complete visibility into their OT networks with real-time alerts, all in one user-friendly dashboard.

Leveraging SCADAfence and IBM QRadar

CISOs and their organization are always looking to enable their IT and security teams to detect and respond to security incident events more efficiently, but they also want to simplify how to address the lack of visibility into the security of OT environments at the same time. At SCADAfence, we believe we can achieve more through collaboration and integrations. Organizations can leverage SCADAfence’s OT security platform and alerting with QRadar’s strengths across all their industrial OT and IIoT environments to provide complete OT visibility and threat detection to respond to security incidents all in one dashboard.

The SCADAfence & IBM QRadar integration alerts dashboard

Diagram 02. The SCADAfence & IBM QRadar integration alerts dashboard

Complete OT Network Visibility 

SCADAfence’s leading OT security platform is configured to minimize any interruption to the normal operation of the customer environment and provides OT insights and produces risk management recommendations that are appropriate to your organization’s needs. This is accomplished by discovering the assets and their roles in the network which provides visibility into their behavior. With a wide range of algorithms and mechanisms, the SCADAfence Platform detects anomalies that can compromise security, safety and reliability.

Multi-Layered Approach to OT Defense

Easily integrate the benefits of the SCADAfence Platform to provide endpoint controls with behavioral indicators of compromise across endpoints and operational networks. This will allow IBM QRadar users to have the visibility to respond across IIoT and OT environments, all within a single dashboard. This integration empowers customers with SCADAfence’s OT security technology while providing the needed visibility into OT equipment.

Automated Asset Inventory 

The SCADAfence Platform allows IBM QRadar customers to automatically discover and continuously manage their entire asset inventory up to date with detailed information on all the devices connected to their OT networks. Regardless of the vendors and controllers deployed in the infrastructure, the platform automatically generates asset inventory without needing any prior knowledge.

Efficient Detection of Incidents

With IBM QRadar and SCADAfence, users can correlate network traffic behavior with host and user behaviors across multiple network areas. Easily surface critical events and detect incidents across machines and networks that would previously go completely undetected. Quickly react and precisely prevent further attack propagation with an automatic correlation of OT manipulation commands with compromised host indications.

Proactive Operational Insights

SCADAfence Platform continuously alerts IBM QRadar users of any abnormal behavior or configuration changes that may have an impact on their operations’ stability before it actually affects their operations. The SCADAfence platform utilizes the most advanced OT security technology to gain the most up-to-date industry insights, which helps provide users with better security alerts and recommendations on how to remediate today’s OT vulnerabilities that may impact your environment.

The SCADAfence & IBM QRadar integration log activity dashboard

Diagram 03. The SCADAfence & IBM QRadar integration log activity dashboard

Discover the instant value of OT security in your QRadar environment. Mutual customers with an active subscription to SCADAfence can go to the IBM Security App Exchange and download SCADAfence Platform integration for IBM QRadar.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About SCADAfence
SCADAfence helps companies with large-scale operational technology (OT) networks embrace the benefits of industrial IoT by reducing cyber risks and mitigating operational threats. Our non-intrusive platform provides full coverage of large-scale networks, offering best-in-class detection accuracy, asset discovery and user experience. The platform seamlessly integrates OT security within existing security operations, bridging the IT/OT convergence gap. SCADAfence secures OT networks in manufacturing, building management and critical infrastructure industries. We deliver security and visibility for some of world’s most complex OT networks, including Europe’s largest manufacturing facility. With SCADAfence, companies can operate securely, reliably and efficiently as they go through the digital transformation journey.

Why Hospital Cyber Protection Is a Hard Nut to Crack

There is a simple reason why hospitals are the frequent targets of cybercriminals. Hospital networks contain patients’ and research data that is highly valued on the black market. And their infrastructure specifics make protecting it difficult.

In 2020, all 16 Czech key hospitals covered that year by the Cybersecurity Act reported a cyber incident. But also smaller healthcare facilities were being attacked and protecting them was no less complicated.

There are a few complications that make hospital cybersecurity challenging: the complex architecture of hospital networks, the frequent obsolescence of operating systems and also the insufficient number of qualified security personnel.

In addition, legislative requirements place high demands on security, including:

  • GDPR
  • Your National eHealth Center’s methodological guidelines (if you have one)
  • International standards that summarize security recommendations for the use of healthcare systems and best practices (ENISA – Cyber security and resilience for Smart Hospitals, MDISS – Medical Device Innovation, Safety & Security Consortium)

Last, but not least, every organization usually has its own internal security regulations. These are based on risk analyses or the internal recommendations and requirements of the hospital’s governing board for the operation of IT in the hospital.

The Most Common Targets of Attackers

In the first stages, attackers aim usually at hospital employees’ login credentials, through which attackers try to gain access to VPNs, internal or health information systems. All these systems contain high-value data through which the attacker can hold the hospital to ransom.

Another source of income for attackers is research data that can be effectively monetized, but patient data is an especially big gain. The price for this information (data about a person and their health status) is from tens to hundreds of dollars per record on the black market. By contrast, mere contact details (for example, from a hacked e-shop) are only worth units of dollars.

And, of course, there are attacks whose primary goal is to take a hospital out of operation. In the case of compromised information systems, hospitals are unable to retrieve medical records or determine the availability of drugs and supplies. In the worst case scenario, the attack affects the operational infrastructure.

In short: the hospital cannot provide the healthcare function essential for its patients.

The Specifics of Internal Hospital Networks

Hospital internal networks have a specific and rather complicated architecture. They are the combination of not only IT elements but also include the operational technology of specialized medical departments as well as devices such as air conditioning, heating or blind controls.

There are many different types of IT networks in hospitals, for example:

  • Medical networks, in which doctors and nurses access medical records, inventories and other medical information
  • Patient networks, which are used by patients and visitors to the hospital
  • Private physician networks, which lease connectivity from the hospital and also have access to the internal network of information systems

All of this is often complicated by the frequent use of outdated systems and insufficient staff capacity to ensure the organization’s cybersecurity.

We should view these characteristics as specifics that cannot be immediately addressed but need to be kept in mind when securing health facilities. For example, some modalities (diagnostic equipment such as X-ray machines, ultrasound, etc.) were purchased by hospitals 10 to 15 years ago and their level of security corresponds to their age. Often, the manufacturer does not even provide necessary updates, so there are devices with an un-updated operating system in the network. We have seen devices running on Windows XP. Even DOS and old versions of Linux are not rare as without these operating systems, it is not possible to use these devices.

Our experience, coming from dozens of hospitals in the European Union and Asia, has shown us that there are many hospitals with a high level of cyber protection. Unfortunately, there are also those with a large number of security shortcomings that need to be solved. Fortunately, GREYCORTEX Mendel can help them all.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About GREYCORTEX
GREYCORTEX uses advanced artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data mining methods to help organizations make their IT operations secure and reliable.

MENDEL, GREYCORTEX’s network traffic analysis solution, helps corporations, governments, and the critical infrastructure sector protect their futures by detecting cyber threats to sensitive data, networks, trade secrets, and reputations, which other network security products miss.

MENDEL is based on 10 years of extensive academic research and is designed using the same technology which was successful in four US-based NIST Challenges.

遠端工作新常態造成的內部資安威脅

自COVID-19危機爆發以來,遠端工作可能是未來新的工作常態,即使員工將來可能會回到疫情大流行前的生活。部分人因為防疫而在家工作,部分辦公室可能因為人數與空間效率考量,朝向比以往更加偏遠地區改租。同時也發現居家異地辦公,可能會節省空間和通勤成本、提高生產率和提高員工滿意度等好處。

雖然是因為大流行而在被迫異地工作,但即使公共防疫限制取消或緩和下來,他們仍然寧願繼續遠端工作。但這種轉變也帶來了與硬體、軟體和網路連接等相關挑戰。除了Zoom、Teams 等這類視訊會議工具可以讓團隊面對面會議,許多協同作業和溝通方案也都會依賴於高性能的網路。

 

來自遠端工作的內部威脅

異地遠端工作不太可能很快消失,基於場地設備限制,在異地辦公的環境中,並非可以輕易達成資安上的要求。這些軟硬體設施也成為IT管理,資安管理上最難顧全的一環。過往在傳統上,傾向投資網路基礎建設,注重邊境防禦等,實務建置偏向企業網路安全。這時候關注的內部威脅可以比較明白的劃分,威脅可能來自心懷不滿的員工,企圖擾亂運營;取得客戶資料以獲得利益的員工,或者忽視公司政策的粗心同事。當端點及移動用戶不在辦公現場時,這個問題就變得複雜多了,因為我們須要防衛的insider threats 分散在世界各地。

從技術上來說,內部威脅是內部人員利用其被授予的存取權限,或者是利用對組織專業領域的理解來破壞或損害業務。內部人員不僅僅限於員工,他們可以是有權存取內部的系統或資訊的人。這可能包括前僱員、承包商、供應商甚至董事會成員。即使是與異地遠端工作員工同住的家庭成員,也有可能看到或存取他們不應該看到系統。

 

內部威脅防禦

當涉及內部威脅時,防禦目標必須包含嚇阻、偵測和阻斷。嚇阻始於為所有員工、承包商和其他被授權人員制定明確的政策和安全意識訓練,在內部和外部建立保護性安全措施。與此同時,異地遠距工作的員工更有可能在使用的裝置上,混合使用個人事務和工作專業;從而將組織敏感資訊置於風險之中,面臨潛在的隱私洩漏或員工監管違規行為。因此組織需要密切管理,種存取,優先考慮端點上的活動監視控管與連接裝置控管,而非僅僅考量網路安全。

引用 IBM 最新內部威脅成本報告中,調查的 4,716 起內部威脅案例中,員工疏忽這個因素佔其中 2,962 起。簡之,公司不能依賴員工自行決定他們的網路安全措施。相反的,他們需要為工作的端點做好安全準備。應該使用員工活動監控、內部威脅檢測和其他系統來執行這些安全規則,以保持與現企業環境內相同的安全防護等級。

 

異地工作適用端點零信任方案

要能夠將安全防護措施適用到各種Work From Home, Remote Workforce, 或是 Distributed Workforce,由於地點不一,使用裝置也沒辦法在中央監控之下,端點安全防護方案要比網路安全方案來的適合。在端點上可以強固的遵循公司的安全規則,在零信任架構之下涵蓋這幾個方面:

 

使用者活動監視

與網路行為監視相比,端點的活動監視更貼近人的實際行為。所獲的稽核記錄軌跡,也具備較好的資訊內容清晰度。在網路端看到的是封包活動交易事件,不容易還原成人的實際操作活動,還可能受限於所支援的通信協定。在端點上,不論是網頁瀏覽,檔案的使用活動歷程,軟體的執行,通訊軟體的操作傳輸等,都可以有效保留記錄證據,甚至保留實體檔案證據。

 

端點裝置控管

由於端點上可以連接各式裝置,須確保限制使用信任的裝置。封鎖所有可用外接裝置可能是方案之一,但會嚴重危害業務運作。而現今的端點的連接裝置具備各種生產力所需的功能,不能為了資安防護而妨礙工作。套用零信任裝置的概念,組織可以註冊認可的信任裝置納入白名單;其他裝置則阻擋存取。信任的裝置則加以限制存取控制,例如讀、寫、記錄與備份的控制;一方面保護了端點不會造成洩漏的破口,一方面也顧及了工作需求。

 

應用程式控管

除了傳統以黑名單方式控管應用程式的執行,白名單機制能夠更有效的落實零信任,除了被核准清單之外,一律不允許執行;阻擋不想要的應用程式,不預期的程式被執行,可以有效降低被勒索或惡意利用的攻擊風險。組織也可能會基於軟體授權的因素,管制使用者在端點上安裝、執行軟體。

 

動態適應政策

靜態政策通常以True / False 決定允許或拒絕,但現實世界的工作不會這麼單純。很多組織採取分流A/B組輪流到辦公室上班。除了以人的角色為主的安全政策外,因應上班位置、上班時間判斷自動切換政策。為了解決靜態規則無法應對變動的環境,主動適應政策根據不同環境條件,建立不同對應行動計畫;可簡化團隊管理複雜度,並減低對使用者工作的干擾。

About Version 2

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products. Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

關於精品科技
精品科技(FineArt Technology) 成立於1989年,由交大實驗室中,一群志同道合的學長學弟所組合而成的團隊,為一家專業的軟體研發公司。從國內第一套中文桌上排版系統開始,到投入手寫辨識領域,憑藉著程式最小、速度最快、辨識最準等優異特性,獲得許多國際大廠的合作與肯定。歷經二十個寒暑,精品科技所推出的產品,無不廣受客戶好評。

Preview of Scale Computing at SpiceWorld: How Edge Computing is Fueling Innovation Today

Edge Computing represents one of the most transformative trends in the modern IT landscape. Yet even among seasoned IT practitioners, confusion remains about why and how applications running at the edge are critical for business success.

At this year’s SpiceWorld Virtual event, Scale Computing’s co-founder and chief product officer, Scott Loughmiller will be presenting a half-hour session entitled “Edge Computing: Autonomous Application Infrastructure Beyond the Data Center.” Scott will demystify what edge computing is all about, describe the challenges that make edge computing necessary, and explain how the edge is fueling innovation in the modern enterprise. See his short welcome video, below.

If your organization operates in distributed locations such as remote or branch offices, retail stores, manufacturing facilities, or even a fleet of ships, you probably already run applications at all these sites. And the digital demands of today will only make that more necessary. The use cases for edge computing are being driven by the explosion of data generated by IoT devices and sensors, the need to reduce application latency and deal with unreliable connectivity, and the ever-present data security and privacy concerns.

Why the Edge is Now

Gartner estimates 10% of enterprise generated data is currently being created and processed outside the data center or cloud, but forecasts this figure will mushroom to 75% by the year 2025.

As Scott points out, “not all applications can or should run in the cloud.”

To make his case for why edge computing is having its moment in the sun, Scott offers up an example of a quick service restaurant with thousands of locations. In this scenario, he says the CEO has charged the CTO with the Herculean task of introducing app-based payments to all of their stores within a year.

Each of these locations operate like an independent small business without dedicated staff onsite to manage IT systems. Furthermore, as Scott describes it, the internet connection at all the stores is “literally the least reliable part of their infrastructure so they can’t count on the cloud to run their app-based payments.”

To which Scott poses a provocative question: “What kind of technology leader do you want to be? The one that suffers under the demands of the CEO because you’re behind or the one who’s leading the technology decisions and creating real value for your company?”

Edge Use Cases IRL

It’s easy to think of edge computing as another over-hyped technology that’s years away from being fully realized. However, businesses across a wide range of industries have already embraced edge computing and are leveraging it to drive innovative products and services to market.

To reinforce this point, Scott offers up three diverse use cases of edge computing in the retail, transportation, and manufacturing industries:

  • Jerry’s Foods (Retail): Jerry’s Foods is a chain of 50 retail, grocery, liquor and hardware store. Everything in the store—point of sale system, inventory management, security cameras, building controls and even digital signage—runs on a small cluster of Scale Computing HC3 infrastructure. Each one of these stores runs like their own business yet can be managed remotely in a centralized fashion. Read the Jerry’s Foods case study.
  • Northern Marine (Transportation): Northern Marine operates a diverse fleet of tankers, ferries, and off-shore assets. Each of these vessels rely on a host of critical applications such as crew management, cargo management, accounting, security, and maintenance systems, and even their digital entertainment systems for the ship’s crew. Because internet connectivity is highly intermittent with no on-board IT personnel, Northern Marine has deployed Scale Computing HC3 clusters to run their operations smoothly while at sea. Read the Technology Innovation at Sea white paper.
  • Harrison Steel Castings (Manufacturing): Unlike the other use cases that are really just a modernized way of doing things, with Harrison Steel, a manufacturer of highly engineered precision castings, edge computing is enabling them to do things that were simply not possible before. The machines on the factory floor require continuous calibration to produce the quality parts Harrison Steel is known for. Before deploying Scale Computing, they had to physically collect machine data from across the floor to make adjustments on their machines. With Scale Computing clusters now deployed across the factory floor, the company avoided building a costly new network while improving the delivery of their precision parts. Watch the Industry 4.0 webinar with Harrison Steel.

As Scott says in closing, “Customers are innovating and building better products with edge computing. These new paradigms will create a breeding ground of innovation because it’s happening now. Just like we saw with the cloud, now we will see something similar with the edge, This is the future that’s at our fingertips.”

You can watch Scott’s entire presentation on Tuesday, September 28th at 12:15PM EST by registering for SpiceWorld here.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Scale Computing 
Scale Computing is a leader in edge computing, virtualization, and hyperconverged solutions. Scale Computing HC3 software eliminates the need for traditional virtualization software, disaster recovery software, servers, and shared storage, replacing these with a fully integrated, highly available system for running applications. Using patented HyperCore™ technology, the HC3 self-healing platform automatically identifies, mitigates, and corrects infrastructure problems in real-time, enabling applications to achieve maximum uptime. When ease-of-use, high availability, and TCO matter, Scale Computing HC3 is the ideal infrastructure platform. Read what our customers have to say on Gartner Peer Insights, Spiceworks, TechValidate and TrustRadius.