Skip to content

90+ 2024 Cybersecurity Statistics and Trends

Digital platforms make work more productive, collaboration and communication easier, and user experiences more intuitive and interactive. But as our lives get more concentrated online, technology also makes it a lot easier for hackers and scammers to find new targets.

Cybersecurity pros and cybercriminals are pitted against each other in a constant race to see who can deploy emerging technology faster. Business leaders, workers, and individuals are often unaware of new threats or technologies that can be turned against them — making it even more important for cybersecurity teams to retain an advantage.

Knowing the trends is a key first step to keeping your data secure. Let’s take a look at the cybersecurity statistics and trends shaping 2024, including persistent threats and evolving dangers.

Editor’s Picks: Cybersecurity Statistics

  • The cybersecurity market is expected to grow to $300 billion this year.
  • Cloud environment attacks increased by 75% between 2023 and 2024.
  • 70% of cybersecurity pros say their organization is affected by a shortage of skilled IT employees.
  • Over 90% of successful breaches utilize known vulnerabilities that are left unpatched.
  • Identifying and containing a data breach takes an average of 277 days.
  • The average security budget of small businesses is $500, while the average cost of a data breach is almost $5 million.
  • Hackers find new vulnerabilities every 17 minutes.

Common Cybersecurity Threats in 2024

Cyberattacks are on the rise in 2024 with the increasing use of cloud platforms and AI opening up new ways for bad actors to exploit systems. Many organizations, especially small businesses, are slow to implement security enhancements like multi-factor authentication and passwordless authentication. Cybercriminals continued to rely on methods like phishing, ransomware, and malware. New weaknesses were exposed by attacking IoT devices and hackers using deepfakes to gain an advantage over users.

Types of Cyberattacks

Hackers are always looking for new vulnerabilities, but human error is still the number one way for them to gain access to systems — either through social engineering or poor security habits.

Now let’s break down the numbers for the most common attacks.

Phishing

Internet users are more aware of phishing than they’ve ever been, but criminals keep finding ways to make phony emails look more realistic, especially by exploiting new tools like AI. 

  • 96% of phishing attacks are carried out using email.
  • 30% of small businesses identify phishing as the biggest threat to their data.
  • Phishing attacks have increased by over 1,000% as a result of generative AI.
  • Almost 60% of organizations report daily and weekly phishing attacks.
  • 50% of people who were tricked by a phishing attack say it was because they were distracted or tired.
  • Hackers faked emails from Microsoft in over 40% of phishing attempts.

Ransomware

Incidents of ransomware hit an all-time high in 2024, with the trend of Ransomware as a Service (RaaS) platforms enabling new wave of criminals with minimal technical skills.

  • Over 60% of attacks on government agencies involve ransomware.
  • Ransomware is deployed in 80% of cyberattacks on retail companies.
  • Almost 50% of organizations have a ransomware payment policy in place.
  • Less than 10% of businesses who met the demands of hackers and paid a ransom got all of their data back.
  • Paying a ransom makes it up to 80% more likely of additional attacks in the future.
  • 25% of consumers will stop using a product that has been a victim of ransomware.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)

DDoS attacks reached fierce new levels this year, as the most powerful offensives reached speeds of almost 2 Tbps. Computer software, IT service providers, gaming, gambling, and casinos, and media companies were the top five industries targeted by DDoS attacks.

  • DDoS incidents rose 46% in the first half of 2024 compared to the same period in 2023.
  • Russia led the way in blocked IP addresses with over 8.2 million.
  • The U.S. was next in line with over 3 million IP blocked addresses.
  • China finished third with 1.4 million blocked IP addresses.
  • Attacks that lasted over three hours surged 103% this year.
  • DDoS attacks against cryptocurrency firms soared over 600%, compared to a rise of 15% over all other organizations.
  • The 911 S5 botnet was dismantled by the FBI in 2024, after it infected over 19 million devices globally over the course of its lifetime.

Malware

Advances in AI helped hackers create more sophisticated malware that evolves on the fly to evade security systems. AI also aided in creating more realistic phishing bait to lure users into launching malware programs.

  • 560,000 new malware programs are exposed daily.
  • There are over 1 billion malware programs that exist globally.
  • Between 2023 and 2024 malware attacks increased by 30%.
  • 48% of organizations have had data stolen by malware.
  • Android devices are 50 times more likely to be vulnerable to malware than iOS devices.
  • Word, Excel, and PDF files are the most common vectors to spread malware via email.
  • 58% of malware infections are launched by Trojans.
  • China has the highest number of computers infected with malware.
  • The U.S. is the top target for malware attackers, getting hit with 900% greater frequency than the number two target U.K.

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) 

APTs use the most advanced tools to avoid detection and remain inside systems to steal information and sabotage long-term operations. They’re often deployed in high-stakes attacks against governments or major organizations. 

  • Attacks against the supply chain increased significantly in 2024, making up 17% of APT incidents.
  • AI models like WormGPT and FraudGPT are increasingly being used by bad actors to launch APT spear-phishing attacks.
  • In 2024 hacktivists are estimated to have been responsible for up to 10% of APT attacks, compared to only about 2% historically. The increase is connected to the rise of geopolitical conflicts.
  • It’s estimated that 60-70% of APT attacks are focused on espionage.

Man-in-the-Middle (MITM)

In a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack, hackers intercept data as it’s exchanged between two parties. This type of breach is usually done over an unsecured Wi-Fi network or through spoofing IP addresses, login pages, or other legitimate access points. 

  • MITM attacks are responsible for 19% of successful cyberattacks this year.
  • MITM compromised emails have increased by 35% since 2021.
  • Internet of Things (IoT) environments and smart devices are being targeted more frequently by MITM attacks. 

Insider Threats

An organization is only as secure as the people inside of it. Some insiders make honest mistakes, some are negligent, and others intentionally defy rules. To combat individual vulnerabilities more companies have looked to IT unification strategies turned to Zero Trust policies.

  • Insider threats are responsible for almost 43% of all breaches.
  • Roughly 50% of insider threats are considered accidental, and the other 50% intentional.
  • 80% of employees admit to using shadow IT SaaS applications without approval.
  • 65% of organizations have implemented Zero Trust models to improve access management and compliance.
  • Companies using conditional access strategies save $1 million or more on costs related to data breaches than companies without Zero Trust policies in place.

Emerging Cyberthreats

New threats that surfaced in 2024 were driven by a rise in geopolitical tensions, hackers weaponizing AI tools, and new technologies providing novel attack vectors for thieves to exploit. 

State-Sponsored Attacks

Specific events like the Paris Olympics and U.S. elections contribute to the rise of state-sponsored attacks. With the recent surge in armed conflict, expect cyber operations by enemies and allies to expand across the globe.

  • China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran have all been identified as a cause of cyberattacks on the U.S. and its allies.
  • Online attacks in Ukraine have increased over 300% since the start of the war with Russia in 2022.
  • During the Israel-Hamas conflict DDoS attacks against Israeli websites have increased by 400%, while DDoS attacks against Palestine increased 60% within the first two days of the conflict.

Unsecured Internet of Things (IoT) Devices

Increasing adoption of smart devices, medical devices, and home systems give cybercriminals new targets to aim for every day. This year, security researchers demonstrated how MITM attacks could be used to unlock, start, and steal Tesla vehicles through the Tesla phone app.

  • Organizations are expected to invest up to $15 trillion in IoT by 2025.
  • IoT devices are usually attacked five minutes after getting online.
  • 48% of businesses say they are unable to detect IoT security breaches on their network.
  • Routers are the point of entry in almost 75% of IoT attacks.
  • 98% of IoT traffic is not encrypted.

Deepfake and Emerging Technologies

Cybercriminals are using deepfakes to make scams more effective, even against the savviest users — making it one of the fastest-growing facets in online crime.

  • 64% of surveyed IT pros predict an increase in deepfake attacks over the next 18 months.
  • 75% of organizations reported at least one deepfake-related security issue during the past year.
  • Deepfake fraud skyrocketed over 1,700% in North America last year.
  • 73% of organizations plan to invest in training to identify deepfakes.
  • 52% of employees who fell prey to a phishing link believed the email came from a C-suite executive at their organization.

Cryptojacking

Bad actors hijack business and personal devices, then configure them in a network to mine cryptocurrencies. 

  • Cryptojacking attempts increased almost 400% in the last year.
  • Healthcare and education were the hardest hit by cryptojacking. Healthcare experienced an almost 700% rise. Education organizations were hit with 320 times the number of attacks as the previous year.
  • It’s expected 13.5 million users will be compromised by cryptojacking this year.

Incidence Rate Statistics

New technologies and motivations lead bad actors to launch attacks against all types of institutions and individuals. 2024 is expected to be the costliest year for cybercrimes yet as incidents continue to rise.

  • Data breaches exposed over 7 billion records in the first half of 2024.
  • In 2023 over 7 trillion intrusion attempts were reported, 20% more than 2022.
  • There was a 71% year-over-year increase in attacks that used stolen credentials.
  • 50% of all known vulnerabilities have been published in the last five years.
  • The National Vulnerability Database reported over 30,000 new intrusion points were discovered last year.

The Cost of Cybercrime

The worldwide cost of cybercrime is expected to hit $9.5 trillion in 2024 and rise an additional $1 trillion through 2025. In addition to the high price of attacks, ransoms, and lost revenue, affected organizations also face recovery expenses, regulatory fines, and reputational damage that leads to a loss of customers.

Financial Impact on Businesses

It’s well documented that cyberattacks cost businesses millions per incident. Defenses are never foolproof, but strong security policies and mitigation plans can limit damage and save organizations a significant amount of money in the event of a breach.

  • In 2024, recovery from ransomware attack costs an average of $2.73 million.
  • $17,700 is lost every minute due to phishing attacks.
  • Enterprise organizations spend $2700 per full time employee per year on cybersecurity.
  • Hospitals spend 64% more on advertising after being exposed in data breaches.
  • In 2024, cybersecurity spending is expected to increase 8% to $87 billion in the U.S.
  • Cyber insurance premiums cost U.S. organizations over $12 billion this year.

Economic Consequences

To protect consumers and promote cybersecurity, governments are creating stricter privacy and data laws that come along with major consequences for business. The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is seen as the model legislation for many countries moving forward.

  • Meta was fined $1.3 billion for violating GDPR regulations in 2023.
  • TikTok was fined $379 million for failing to protect the data of minors.
  • 94% of U.S. companies are not prepared to comply with GDPR requirements.
  • 78% of organizations expect increases in regulatory compliance.

Notable Cybercrime Cases

Data breaches are on the rise since 2022. Here are some of the cyberattacks that have made headlines so far in 2024.

  • A ransomware attack disrupted operations in the Change Healthcare system for weeks. The company is said to have paid a $22 million ransom, and congressional testimony revealed the attack may have affected up to one-third of all Americans.
  • X (formerly known as Twitter) was hit with an attack that exposed the personal information of 235 million users.
  • MGM Resorts suffered a data breach that compromised over 140 million records, including sensitive customer information. The estimated cost of the breach was $15 million.
  • LoanDepot fell to a ransomware attack that exposed the data of 16.6 million customers and resulted in a class action lawsuit. In total, the incident cost the company almost $27 million.

Cybersecurity Jobs and Career Outlook

With cybercriminals getting bolder and expanding operations every year, cybersecurity is one of the fastest-growing fields. Currently it’s estimated there are 4.7 million security pros, but nearly two-thirds of industry leaders believe their security teams are understaffed. Education and hands-on experience are key to staying ahead of malicious actors.

Demand for Cybersecurity Professionals

Organizations from small businesses to enterprise companies to government institutions are making it a priority to expand their cybersecurity operations.

  • 93% of organizations expect to increase cybersecurity spending in the next year.
  • 70% of organizations say their IT teams are understaffed.
  • According to Cybersecurity Ventures, there will be over 3 million unfilled cybersecurity positions globally in 2025.
  • In 2023 the unemployment rate for cybersecurity professionals was near 0%.
  • The growth rate for tech jobs is almost double the rate for all jobs during the next decade.

Cybersecurity offers skilled professionals plenty of opportunity. 

  • Information security analyst positions are expected to grow 33% from 2023 to 2033.
  • Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) salaries averaged over $170,000 per year in 2022.
  • The median salary for security analysts is over $100,000 in 2024.
  • Salaries for entry-level roles in cybersecurity average over $60,000.

Secure Your Environment With JumpCloud

JumpCloud deploys multiple strategies to help secure your environment. Explore more to see how JumpCloud can be part of your cybersecurity solution with SSO, password management, and system insights that keep you informed of everything going on with your network. 

Sign up for a free JumpCloud account to see how we can get you to your cybersecurity goals. By teaming up against bad actors, we can make a positive impact on cybersecurity trends.

About JumpCloud
At JumpCloud, our mission is to build a world-class cloud directory. Not just the evolution of Active Directory to the cloud, but a reinvention of how modern IT teams get work done. The JumpCloud Directory Platform is a directory for your users, their IT resources, your fleet of devices, and the secure connections between them with full control, security, and visibility.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Cross-Site Request Forgery Cheat Sheet

“Aren’t you a little short for a Stormtrooper?” In this iconic Star Wars moment, Princess Leia lazily responds to Luke Skywalker, disguised as one of her Stormtrooper captors and using authentication information to open her cell.

 

In other words, Star Wars acts as an analogy for a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. In a CSRF attack, malicious actors use social engineering so that end-users will give them a way to “hide” in their authenticated session. Disguised as the victim, the attackers can make changes and engage in transactions based on the account’s permissions.

 

With a cross-site request forgery cheat sheet, you can learn the basic principles underlying these attacks and some best mitigation practices.

What is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)?

A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack involves inheriting the victim’s identity and privileges so that the attacker can perform actions within the site. Typically, browser requests include credential information, like a user’s:

  • Session cookie
  • IP address
  • Windows domain credentials

 

After a user authenticates into the site, the attackers target functions that allow them to make changes, like:

  • Changing an email address
  • Creating a new password
  • Making a purchase
  • Transferring funds
  • Elevating privileges

 

The site treats these forged, authenticated requests as legitimate and authorized. The attacks focus on making changes within the site because any data requested would go to the victim.

 

CSRF attacks can also be called:

  • XSRF
  • Sear Surf attacks
  • Session Riding
  • Cross-Site Reference Forgery
  • Hostile Linking

 

Three Types of CSRF Attacks

Malicious actors can deploy three types of CSRF attacks.

LOGIN CSRF Attack

In a login CSRF attack, malicious actors:

  • Get the user to log into an account the threat actor controls
  • Victim adds personal data to the account
  • Attackers log into the account to collect data and victim activity history

 

Stored CSRF Flaws

Attackers can store an attack on a vulnerable site using fields that accept HTML using:

  • IMG tag
  • IFRAME tag

This increases the damage of the attack for two reasons:

  • Victims may “trust” the compromised site.
  • Victims may already be authenticated into the site.

 

Client-side CSRF

The client-side CSRF attack manipulates the client-side JavaScript program’s requests or parameters, sending a forged request that tricks the target site. These attacks rely on input validation issues so the server-side has no way to determine whether the request was intentional.

How does a CSRF attack work?

At a high level, attackers do two things:

  • Create the malicious code
  • Use social engineering to trick the victim

 

CSRF attacks rely on:

  • Web browsers handling session-related information
  • Attackers’ knowledge of web application URLs, requests, or functionality
  • Application session management only using browser information
  • HTML tags that provide immediate HTTP[S] resource access

 

By clicking on the malicious URL or script, the victim sets up the attacker’s ability to exploit:

  • GET requests: Browser submits the unauthorized request.
  • POST requests: Victim clicking on a link or submit button executes the action.
  • HTTP methods: APIs using PUT or DELETE could have requests embedded into an exploit page, but same-origin policy restrictions in browsers can protect against these unless the website explicitly allows these requests.

 

How is Cross-Site Request Forgery Different from Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)?

 

These attacks exploit different aspects of web interactions:

  • Cross-Site Request Forgery: leverages use identity to take state-changing actions without victim consent
  • Cross-site scripting: inject malicious code into web pages to manipulate user input and access sensitive data

 

Best Practices for Mitigating CSRF Attack Risk

A successful CSRF attack exploits specific application vulnerabilities and a user’s privileges. Following some best practices, you can mitigate these risks.

 

Use Synchronizer Token Patterns

As the most effective mitigation, many frameworks include CSRF protection by default so you may not have to build one yourself. The server-side-generated CSRF tokens should be:

  • Unique per user per session
  • Secret
  • Unpredictable

 

The server-side component verifies the token’s existence and validity, comparing it to the token in the user session and the site should reject the request without it.

 

The mitigation uses per-session tokens because they offer the end-user a better experience. A per-request token would be more secure by limiting the available time frame for using them. However, for every user interaction, the site would need to generate a new token.

Alternative: Signed Double-Submit Cookie Patterns

In cases where you can’t use the synchronizer token, you could substitute the easy-to-implement, stateless Double-Submit Cookie pattern. With the Signed Double-Submit Cookie, you have a secret key that only the server knows to mitigate injection risks that would compromise the victim’s session.

 

While the Naive Double-Submit Cookie methods may be easier to implement and scale, attackers can bypass the protection more easily through:

  • Subdomain exploitation
  • Man-in-the-middle (MitM) attacks

 

Disallow Simple Requests

Simple requests are cross-origin HTTP requests that can be sent directly from the browser to the target service without getting prior approval. If the site uses <form> tags that allow users to submit data, the application should include additional protections. Some examples of additional protections include:

  • Ensuring servers or APIs do not accept text/plain content types
  • Implementing custom request headers for AJAX/APIs to prevent usability issues that using a double-submit cookie would create

 

Implement Client-side CSRF Mitigations

Since client-side CSRF attacks bypass traditional mitigations, you should implement the following:

  • Independent requests: Ensure attacker controllable inputs cannot generate asynchronous requests
  • Input validation: Ensure that input formats and request parameter values only work for non-state-changing operations
  • Predefined Request Data: Store safe request data in the JavaScript code

 

SameSite (Cookie Attribute)

The browser uses this attribute to determine whether to send cookies with cross-site requests and has three potential values:

  • Strict: prevents the browser from sending the cookie to the target site in all cross-site browsing contexts that involve following a regular link
  • Lax: maintains a logged-in session when the user follows an external link, but blocks high-risk request methods

 

Verify Origin with Standard Headers

This method examines the HTTP request header value for:

  • Source origin: where it comes from
  • Target origin: where it’s going to

 

When these match, the site accepts the request as legitimate. If they do not match, it discards the request.

Involve the User

Involving users means they have to take action that mitigates risks from unauthorized operations. Some examples include using:

  • Re-authentication mechanisms
  • One-time tokens

 

While CAPTCHA requires user interaction, it does not always differentiate user sessions. While it would make attacker success more difficult, it isn’t a suggested mitigation technique.

 

Graylog Security: Mitigating CSRF Risk with High Fidelity Alerts

Graylog Security provides prebuilt content that maps security events to MITRE ATT&CK so organizations can enhance their security posture. By combining Sigma rules and MITRE ATT&CK, you can create high-fidelity alerting rules that enable robust threat detection, lightning-fast investigations, and streamlined threat hunting. For example, with Graylog’s security analytics, you can monitor user activity for anomalous behavior indicating a potential security incident. By mapping this activity to the MITRE ATT&CK Framework, you can detect and investigate adversary attempts at using Valid Accounts to gain Initial Access, mitigating risk by isolating compromised accounts earlier in the attack path and reducing impact.

Graylog’s risk scoring capabilities enable you to streamline your threat detection and incident response (TDIR) by aggregating and correlating the severity of the log message and event definitions with the associated asset, reducing alert fatigue and allowing security teams to focus on high-value, high-risk issues.

 

About Graylog  
At Graylog, our vision is a secure digital world where organizations of all sizes can effectively guard against cyber threats. We’re committed to turning this vision into reality by providing Threat Detection & Response that sets the standard for excellence. Our cloud-native architecture delivers SIEM, API Security, and Enterprise Log Management solutions that are not just efficient and effective—whether hosted by us, on-premises, or in your cloud—but also deliver a fantastic Analyst Experience at the lowest total cost of ownership. We aim to equip security analysts with the best tools for the job, empowering every organization to stand resilient in the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Elevating IT Infrastructure: The Integration of MDM

Have you ever purchased a security system or saw one? If not, let’s paint a picture. Just imagine that you have purchased a state-of-the-art home security system. It has all the bells and whistles, cameras, motion sensors, smart locks, and whatnot. But now you face the challenge of integrating it with your existing household setup. You need it to work smoothly with your current security protocols, connect effortlessly to your home network, and make sure it doesn’t disrupt your daily routine.

Do you get the idea? Similarly, in the mobile-driven corporate world, simply acquiring a Mobile Device Management (MDM) solution is insufficient. The challenge lies in seamlessly integrating it into your existing IT infrastructure to maintain operational integrity and security. 

Integration of MDM
Integrate MDM Solutions Into Your Existing IT Infrastructure

This blog discusses the strategic considerations for seamlessly integrating MDM solutions, which promise streamlined management and better security without causing disruptions.

Challenges of Managing IT Infrastructure Without MDM

When did you last try to juggle multiple responsibilities without a proper system? It could be organizing a family vacation, where you had to book flights, hotels, and activities while managing work deadlines and household chores. The stress and inefficiency can be overwhelming, right? 

The same applies to businesses managing hundreds or thousands of mobile devices without a centralized solution.

1. Security and Compliance Risks

Security is a top priority for any industry. Without a centralized MDM solution, ensuring all devices are consistently updated with the latest security patches is like trying to herd cats. Each device has its schedule, and users often delay updates, either out of convenience or simply because of forgetfulness. This lack of uniformity leaves significant gaps in your security.

Inconsistent security updates can lead to major headaches. What if a new malware strain is spreading rapidly? IT teams must manually scramble to update each device without an MDM solution—a slow and error-prone process. In the meantime, the organization remains exposed to potential breaches, risking sensitive data and regulatory non-compliance. It’s like locking some doors in your house while leaving others wide open, hoping intruders won’t find the unlocked ones.

2. Operational Inefficiencies

Operational inefficiencies are another major issue. Manual device management has substantial operational overhead and resource consumption. IT staff spend countless hours on mundane tasks like setting up devices, pushing updates, and troubleshooting issues, which could be better spent on strategic initiatives. This wastes valuable resources and stifles innovation and growth.

3. User Experience and Support

A diverse device environment can be a support nightmare. Different devices and operating systems require specialized knowledge and tools, making it challenging to provide consistent support. Consistent access to corporate resources can be critical without a unified management solution. Some users might have access to their emails and files, while others struggle with intermittent connectivity and permission issues. This inconsistency hampers productivity and can lead to dissatisfaction among employees, as they feel unsupported and hindered in their work.

Strategic Considerations for Integrating MDM into IT Infrastructure

Careful planning and strategic considerations are essential when integrating an MDM solution into your IT infrastructure to ensure a smooth and effective deployment. Here, we look into some key aspects, such as compatibility and deployment models, providing insights to help you navigate the integration process.

1. Compatibility 

Before implementing an MDM solution, verifying its compatibility with your current IT infrastructure is important. This includes assessing compatibility with servers, network configurations, and security protocols. This compatibility check helps:

  • Avoid Potential Conflicts: Ensuring the MDM solution works seamlessly with existing components and prevents disruptions during and after integration.
  • Facilitate Smooth Integration: Compatibility ensures the MDM software can be deployed efficiently, reducing the risk of integration issues that could lead to downtime or compromised security.
  • Maintain Security Standards: Verifying compatibility ensures the MDM solution aligns with your existing security measures, maintaining the integrity of your overall security posture.

2. Deployment Models

Selecting the appropriate deployment model for your MDM solution is vital. The choice will depend on your industry’s specific needs, resources, and strategic goals. Here are the three primary deployment models:

a) Cloud-based 

Benefits

  • Quick Deployment: Cloud-based MDM solutions can be deployed rapidly, allowing for faster implementation.
  • Scalability: Cloud solutions offer the flexibility to scale up or down based on business needs, accommodating growth or changes in device management requirements.
  • Reduces Upfront Costs: Cloud models typically involve lower initial investments, as there is no need for extensive hardware purchases or infrastructure upgrades.

Challenges

  • Data Privacy Concerns: Storing data in the cloud raises potential privacy issues, especially for businesses dealing with sensitive information.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity: Cloud solutions rely on stable Internet connections, and any disruption in server connectivity can affect access and functionality.

Best Practices

  • Conduct Thorough Risk Assessments: Evaluate potential risks associated with data storage and access to the cloud.
  • Ensure Compliance with Data Protection Regulations: Verify that the cloud provider complies with relevant data protection laws and standards.
  • Establish Clear SLAs with the Cloud Provider: Define service level agreements that outline performance expectations, support, and security measures.

b) On-Premise 

Security Considerations

  • Greater Control Over Data: On-premise solutions provide direct control over data storage and security measures, which is critical for businesses with stringent data protection requirements.
  • Customizable Security Measures: Businesses can customize security protocols and configurations to meet their specific needs.

Resource Requirements

  • Significant Investment: Implementing an on-premise solution requires substantial hardware, software, and ongoing maintenance investment.
  • Dedicated Resources: Ensure sufficient resources are allocated to manage and support the on-premise MDM infrastructure.

Best Practices

  • Regularly Update and Patch the MDM Software: Keep the MDM software updated to protect against vulnerabilities and ensure optimal performance.
  • Maintain Backup and Disaster Recovery Plans: Implement comprehensive backup and recovery strategies to safeguard data and ensure business continuity.
  • Allocate Dedicated Resources for Management and Support: Ensure skilled personnel can manage and support the MDM infrastructure.

c) Virtual Private Cloud (VPC)

  • Flexibility and Control
    • Combines Cloud and On-Premise Benefits: VPCs offer the scalability and flexibility of cloud solutions while providing control similar to on-premise deployments.
    • Customizable Environment: Businesses can configure the VPC to meet specific needs and security requirements.

Benefits of Integrating MDM into IT Infrastructure

Integrating MDM into your IT infrastructure offers numerous advantages that enhance security, efficiency, and user experience. Here are the key benefits:

1. Streamlined Device Enrollment and Configuration

MDM solutions simplify enrolling and configuring new devices, ensuring they meet corporate standards from the start. This reduces the time and effort required to set up devices and ensures consistency across the industry.

2. Strengthened Security

MDM provides centralized control over security policies, ensuring consistent updates and reducing vulnerabilities across all devices. Features like remote-wipe and encryption further safeguard corporate data, protecting against breaches and unauthorized access.

3. Increased Productivity

By consolidating management tasks into a single platform, MDM software reduces the complexity and overhead of device management. Automated processes streamline operations and free up IT resources, allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives that drive business growth.

4. Improved Regulatory Compliance

MDM solutions help businesses comply with industry regulations by enforcing security policies and maintaining audit trails. This ensures all devices adhere to compliance standards, reducing the risk of fines and legal issues.

5. Cost Savings

MDM solutions can lead to significant cost savings by automating device management and reducing the need for manual interventions. They also minimize the resources required for IT support and reduce downtime.

Seamlessly Integrate your Existing IT Infrastructure with Scalefusion 

Scalefusion offers flexible deployment options to fit your business needs, whether you prefer cloud, on-premise, or VPC solutions. This versatility ensures you can seamlessly integrate Scalefusion’s MDM capabilities into your existing IT infrastructure without disrupting your current operations.

If you already use an MDM solution but find it challenging to manage, Scalefusion provides an easy and smooth migration process. Our team ensures seamless transition, allowing you to benefit from Scalefusion’s extensive features.

About Scalefusion
Scalefusion’s company DNA is built on the foundation of providing world-class customer service and making endpoint management simple and effortless for businesses globally. We prioritize the needs and feedback of our customers, making sure that they are at the forefront of all decision-making processes. We are dedicated to providing comprehensive customer support services, and place emphasis on customer-centric thinking throughout the organization.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Scale Computing Recognized as CRN’s 2024 Product of the Year Finalist

Scale Computing Autonomous Infrastructure Management Engine Honored in Edge Computing/Internet of Things Category 

INDIANAPOLIS — October 30, 2024 — Scale Computing, a market leader in edge computing, virtualization, and hyperconverged solutions, today announced that CRN®, a brand of The Channel Company, has recognized Scale Computing Autonomous Infrastructure Management Engine (AIME) as a finalist in the 2024 Product of the Year Awards in the Edge Computing/Internet of Things category.

The CRN Products of the Year Awards recognize the leading partner-friendly products in the IT channel today that either launched or were significantly updated over the last year. These innovative product offerings stand out for their responsiveness to the fast-changing needs of IT solution providers and their customers. The 2024 finalists were chosen by the CRN editorial team in 30 different technology categories.

Scale Computing Autonomous Infrastructure Management Engine (AIME) is the artificial intelligence orchestration and management functionality that powers Scale Computing HyperCore (SC//HyperCore), the award-winning self-healing platform that identifies, reduces, and corrects problems in real-time. AIME builds a model of the state of the system that allows SC//HyperCore to handle day-to-day operational administrative tasks and maintenance automatically, monitors the system for security, hardware, and software errors, and remediates those errors where possible. It also identifies the root cause and minimizes the impact of those issues when it cannot repair them automatically, notifying users with specific problem determination and action, versus just sending a stream of data that must be interpreted.

“Scale Computing is dedicated to simplifying IT infrastructure by offering innovative, intelligent, and user-friendly solutions. AIME drastically reduces the amount of time and effort required to deploy, secure, manage, and maintain on-premises infrastructure. We’re honored to be recognized by CRN as a Product of the Year finalist and remain committed to providing our partners and customers with scalable, high-availability solutions that meet their evolving needs,” said Jeff Ready, CEO and co-founder of Scale Computing.

“Finalists for the 2024 CRN Products of the Year Awards have proven their dedication to developing leading-edge technology that benefits solution provider partners and their customers,” said Jennifer Follett, VP, U.S. Content and Executive Editor, CRN, The Channel Company. “We are pleased to showcase the outstanding products and services of the finalists and look forward to seeing the winners selected by solution providers later this year.”

To learn more about the award-winning Scale Computing Autonomous Infrastructure Management Engine and Scale Computing HyperCore, please visit scalecomputing.com/sc-hypercore.

About Scale Computing 
Scale Computing is a leader in edge computing, virtualization, and hyperconverged solutions. Scale Computing HC3 software eliminates the need for traditional virtualization software, disaster recovery software, servers, and shared storage, replacing these with a fully integrated, highly available system for running applications. Using patented HyperCore™ technology, the HC3 self-healing platform automatically identifies, mitigates, and corrects infrastructure problems in real-time, enabling applications to achieve maximum uptime. When ease-of-use, high availability, and TCO matter, Scale Computing HC3 is the ideal infrastructure platform. Read what our customers have to say on Gartner Peer Insights, Spiceworks, TechValidate and TrustRadius.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Zero Trust vs. least privilege: What’s the difference?

Summary: Zero Trust and least privilege work together to secure your network and protect critical data from unauthorized access. Discover how.

Managing access to network assets is a critical part of cybersecurity. Two concepts constantly arise when discussing access management: Zero Trust and the principle of least privilege.

These are more than just buzzwords. What do these terms mean, and why are they vital in modern cybersecurity? Just as importantly, are Zero Trust and least privilege separate concepts or part of a larger whole?

This blog will explore how the principles differ and help you understand the conceptual basis of secure network access.

What is Zero Trust?

Zero Trust is a strategic security approach that follows the principle “never trust, always verify.”

In cybersecurity, organizations implement this principle via a set of technologies known as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA).

The Zero Trust concept requires a default position of mistrusting all connection requests and internal network activity. Every user and connection poses a potential threat. Systems should only grant access when organizations know for sure users are legitimate.

ZTNA’s main role is safeguarding work-related assets. For example, systems block access requests to documents from unauthorized devices or unusual locations. ZTNA technologies deny access to attackers with stolen credentials, keeping sensitive data safe.

The Zero Trust model departs from traditional security concepts by operating at the network edge and within the network perimeter.

  • Only trusted users can enter the network perimeter. Identity verification happens via credential authentication and tools like device posture checks.
  • Network managers monitor user activity within the network boundary. Access control measures block resources without appropriate permissions.
  • Zero Trust architecture involves continuous security measures. Security tools monitor users continuously, requesting identity verification for each access request.

The idea behind Zero Trust is simple. With ZTNA safeguards in place, businesses make it harder for attackers to move within the network. By enforcing strict verification at each access point, ZTNA helps block any unauthorized access attempts.

Access controls and monitoring shrink the attack surface, limit lateral movement, and give security teams time to take quarantine measures.

The ZTNA framework evolved to suit modern business needs. The rise of distributed workforces and cloud computing made traditional perimeter defense obsolete. Identity-based security makes more as network boundaries become increasingly vague.

 

What is the principle of least privilege?

The principle of least privilege (PoLP) is related to privilege management.

PoLP requires network admins to limit the devices or applications users can access. Users should only enjoy access to resources they need to carry out authorized tasks.

Companies often apply PoLP via role-based access control (RBAC) measures. For example, medical researchers may need access to data sources and reports relevant to their research. Physicians should have access to individual medical records but may not need access to aggregated medical data. This approach ensures that each role has only the permission necessary for its specific responsibilities.

In other cases, PoLP applies dynamically, using just-in-time access, where permissions are granted only for a limited period. For example, DevOps teams at financial institutions may need to escalate privileges for database maintenance temporarily.

With just-in-time access, teams receive the necessary permissions only for the duration of the task, and access to confidential records is automatically revoked once the specific period ends. This way, sensitive access is strictly limited to when it’s needed, reducing long-term exposure to potential security risks.

Least privilege access allows teams to carry out maintenance tasks, before revoking access to confidential records when the task is done.

PoLP aims to reduce the harm caused by malicious actors by minimizing user privileges at all times. If cyber attackers breach network defenses, the principle of least privilege limits their access to sensitive data and critical systems.

When properly applied, PoLP ensures that users only have minimal permissions necessary for their roles. This means that even if attackers gain control of a user’s device, they’ll face restrictions on what actions they can take, reducing the risk of major data breaches or unauthorized access to critical information.

Cutting data breach risks has another important benefit. The principle of least privilege aids compliance with regulations like GDPR, PCI-DSS, and HIPAA. Companies handling confidential information can limit access to those with a legitimate business reason – in line with regulatory requirements.

Least privilege access applies to all network users, from junior staffers to administrators. Nobody should have the freedom to roam across all network resources. Controls include non-human users such as APIs and virtual machines as well.

Privileged access applies to all users within the network directory, requiring a comprehensive analysis of network resources and user identities. Admins must assign privileges accurately and update access rights as needed.

Zero Trust vs. least privilege

The principle of least privilege and ZTNA play complementary roles in digital security architecture, but their scope and how they handle security risks differ.

Let’s start with the similarities. Both frameworks aim to protect data and shrink the attack surface.

ZTNA and least privilege access also use similar tools to achieve this goal. Both frameworks advise using identity and access management (IAM) systems, segmentation, and network monitoring.

 

Are there any important differences between ZTNA and least privilege access?

ZTNA and least privilege are far from identical. However, the key takeaway is the two concepts complement each other in network security setups.

The Zero Trust model is concerned with how organizations authorize user activity. ZTNA-based systems authenticate users, discovering whether they are who they claim to be. Systems verify identities whenever they receive access requests. As a result, ZTNA is generally more resource-intensive and complex. Security teams must verify every activity and access request.

Least privilege access focuses narrowly on how users relate to network assets. In this sense, the principle of least privilege is an essential component of all Zero Trust solutions.

Applied on its own, PoLP is a useful foundation for data protection and privileges management. However, ZTNA delivers greater in-depth protection to meet urgent security needs.

Should you choose between Zero Trust and least privilege models?

The key takeaway is this: There is no natural opposition between Zero Trust vs. least privilege concepts.

Most companies would benefit from using both approaches when designing security measures. PLOP and ZTNA are critical components of Defense-in-Depth (DiD) strategies. You can’t lock down data effectively without considering both frameworks.

Companies can choose how extensively they deploy Zero Trust and least privilege-based access controls. However, in-depth access controls are vital in a world of endemic data breaches and phishing threats.

Key components of Zero Trust and least privilege

Robust network security setups leverage Zero Trust Network Access and the principle of least privilege to safeguard resources. We generally find the following components in both security models:

  • Network asset classification. Companies must identify critical assets before defining access rights. Admins identify assets requiring protection, including data storage, applications, and hardware systems. Access policies define user permissions, enabling precise access control measures.
  • Access controls at the network edge. Traditional access controls filter requests at the network edge. Tools like multi-factor authentication (MFA) and next-generation firewalls admit legitimate users and block unauthorized access requests.
  • Software-defined perimeters. ZTNA deployments often use a software-defined perimeter (SDP) that accommodates today’s flexible network architecture. SDP verifies user identities via credentials, posture checks, and data like user location and access times. Users can then access approved resources without the need for add-ons like VPNs or wholesale network access.
  • Identity and Access Management. Privileged access tools assign permissions, determining which resources users can access and the types of activity they can carry out. For instance, some users may have read privileges, while access rights for others include editing or deleting data.
  • Network segmentation. Network segmentation divides network resources by robust internal walls. Admins define segments via firewalls, software-defined networking (SDN), access control lists, or a combination of measures.
  • Network monitoring. The Zero Trust security models require continuous monitoring of access requests. Systems must check device statuses, user activity, and network traffic patterns. Monitoring ensures users remain at the appropriate privileged access level. Alerts also allow rapid responses to potential data breaches.
  • Threat response. Security teams must shrink the attack surface rapidly when attacks materialize. Zero Trust security advises companies to plan for worst-case scenarios and adopt a proactive approach to quarantining threats.

How do ZTNA and least privilege fit into security systems?

PoLP and ZTNA security measures often complement Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) and encryption to maximize security. VPNs allow remote workers to connect securely and anonymously. ZTNA and least privilege controls limit their access to relevant resources, adding another layer of security protection.

Zero Trust security may also form part of Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions. In this case, adaptive ZTNA controls work with next-generation firewalls and software-defined networking to defend network resources.

SASE is a good model for globally distributed remote workforces. It does not rely on fixed infrastructure or single work locations. Identity verification occurs wherever users connect, so you may not need legacy tools like VPNs.

How NordLayer can help

Implementing Zero Trust solutions or the principle of least privilege can be challenging.

Zero Trust requires companies to cover every asset and user, install reliable monitoring and authentication systems, and handle lengthy periods of disruption. PoLP requires tight privileges management and access controls.

The good news is that expert partners like NordLayer help you manage these problems.

Nordlayer enables you to create virtual private gateways to safeguard access to your sensitive resources, enhanced by additional layers of security.

For example:

  • The Cloud Firewall enables easy network segmentation to strengthen resource protection.
  • IAM solutions like multiple MFA options, single sign-on (SSO), and user provisioning ensure identities are triple-checked.
  • Robust network access control measures such as Device Posture security make sure that only authorized devices or users from allowed locations can connect to the network.

NordLayer can help with whichever approach you adopt. We provide a simple route to implement Zero Trust and the principle of least privilege. To find out more, contact our team to arrange a demo today.

About NordLayer
NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses – from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security.

The web has become a chaotic space where safety and trust have been compromised by cybercrime and data protection issues. Therefore, our team has a global mission to shape a more trusted and peaceful online future for people everywhere.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

Need help? Our team is just a message away