Skip to content

How to Enhance DNS Privacy with DoT and DoH

The Domain Name System (DNS) guides us through the vast expanse of the internet. It is the unsung hero, translating human-readable domain names into the machine-readable IP addresses that our devices understand. But what happens when this essential process is not as private as we would like it to be? The implications for security, privacy, and even human rights can be profound.

The Risks of Plaintext DNS Queries

By default, DNS queries—the questions your computer asks to find the address of a website—are sent in plaintext. This means they are as open to prying eyes as a conversation in a crowded café. Whether it is a network administrator, an Internet Service Provider (ISP), or a more nefarious actor, anyone with the right tools can eavesdrop on these conversations. It is like announcing your destination aloud before stepping into a secret passage. The risks of doing this range from benign but targeted advertising to more sinister issues like government censorship or cybercriminals tracking your online habits.

DoT and DoH for DNS Privacy

Enter the superheroes of DNS privacy: DNS over TLS (DoT) and DNS over HTTPS (DoH). These protocols are the digital equivalent of putting our postcards in envelopes, shielding our queries from those who might want to sneak a peek.

DoT takes our DNS queries and wraps them in the security of TLS (Transport Layer Security), the same protocol that HTTPS websites use to keep your data safe. When a device initiates a DNS query, it establishes a secure connection with the DNS server through a TLS handshake, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of the exchange. DoT prevents eavesdropping by encrypting the data, making it indecipherable to unauthorized parties.

It is like sending your DNS queries in an armored van, ensuring they reach their destination without interference. However, DoT operates on a dedicated port (853), any user with access to the network can see DoT traffic in and out, even if no one can see inside since if the requests and responses themselves are encrypted.

On the flip side, DoH sends these encrypted DNS queries over HTTP or HTTP/2. This means they travel on the same roads as regular internet traffic (port 443), blending in with the crowd. DoH allows users to bypass network restrictions and censorship, making it difficult for intermediaries to selectively inspect or manipulate DNS queries. To a network observer, DoH traffic is indistinguishable from any other secure website visit, making it a master of disguise.

Both DoT and DoH serve the same noble purpose: to protect the privacy and integrity of your DNS queries. They ensure that no one can tamper with or spy on your internet navigation. Yet, their distinct paths—DoT with its exclusive route and DoH camouflaged among the masses—offer different advantages depending on what level of privacy, security measures and compatibility you seek.

SafeDNS also provides the DoT feature, complementing the DoH (DNS over HTTPS) support that is typically enabled by default in most browsers. For guidance on activating DoT through the SafeDNS dashboard, please refer to our detailed instructions available here.

As we stand at this crossroads, the question is not just about which protocol to choose. It is about recognizing the importance of DNS privacy and taking steps to protect it. Whether you lean towards the visibility and security of DoT or the stealth and integration of DoH, the crucial thing is to be aware of your choices and their implications.

In the grand tapestry of the internet, where every click, search, and query weaves a thread, ensuring these threads are secure and private is vital. It is about more than just safeguarding data; it is about preserving the freedom and trust that lie at the heart of the digital age. As we continue to navigate this ever-changing landscape, let us do so with an eye towards not just where we are going, but how safely and privately we can get there.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About SafeDNS
SafeDNS breathes to make the internet safer for people all over the world with solutions ranging from AI & ML-powered web filtering, cybersecurity to threat intelligence. Moreover, we strive to create the next generation of safer and more affordable web filtering products. Endlessly working to improve our users’ online protection, SafeDNS has also launched an innovative system powered by continuous machine learning and user behavior analytics to detect botnets and malicious websites.

System Hardening: Why the Need to Strengthen System Cybersecurity

Today, digital trust is required inside and outside the organization, so tools must be implemented, with cybersecurity methods and best practices in each layer of your systems and their infrastructure: applications, operating systems, users, both on-premise and in the cloud. This is what we call System Hardening an essential practice that lays the foundation for a safe IT infrastructure. Its goal is to reduce the attack surface as much as possible, strengthening the systems to be able to face possible security attacks and get rid of as many entry points for cybercrime as possible.

Content:

Comprehensive Approach to Organizational Security

To implement organizational security, a comprehensive approach is undoubtedly required, since devices (endpoints, sensors, IoT), hardware, software, local environments, cloud (and hybrid) environments must be considered, along with security policies and local and even international regulatory compliance. It should be remembered that today and in the future we must not only protect an organization’s digital assets, but also avoid downtime and possible regulatory sanctions (associated with non-compliance with GDPR and data protection laws). Hardening also helps lay the solid foundation on which to implement advanced security solutions. Later, in Types of Hardening we will see where it is possible to implement security strengthening.

Benefits of Hardening in Cybersecurity

  • Improved system functionality: Hardening measures help optimize system resources, eliminate unnecessary services and software, and apply security patches and updates. The consequences of actions lead to better system performance, as fewer resources are also wasted on unused or vulnerable components.
  • Increased security level: A strengthened system reduces the surface area of a potential attack and strengthens defenses against threats (e.g., malware, unauthorized access, and data breaches). Confidential information is protected and user privacy is guaranteed.
  • Compliance simplification and auditing: Organizations must comply with industry-specific security standards and regulations to protect sensitive data. Hardening helps meet these requirements and ensures compliance with industry-specific standards, such as GDPR (personal data protection), the payment card industry’s data security standard (PCI DSS) or the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Acts (HIPAA, to protect a health insurance user’s data).

Other benefits include ensuring business continuity (without disruption or frictions), multi-layered defense (access controls, encryption, firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and regular security audits), and the ability to take a more proactive stance on security, with regular assessments and updates to prepare for emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
Every safe system must have been previously secured, and this is precisely what hardening consists of.

Types of Hardening

In the IT infrastructure set, there are several subsets that require different security approaches:

1. Configuration Management Hardening

Implementing and configuring security for multiple system components (including hardware, operating systems, and software applications). It also involves disabling unnecessary services and protocols, configuring access controls, implementing encryption, and safe communication protocols. It’s worth mentioning that security and IT teams often keep conflicting agendas. The hardening policy should take into account discussions between the two parties. It is also recommended to implement:

  • Configurable item assessment: From user accounts and logins, server components and subsystems, what software and application updates and vulnerabilities to perform, networks and firewalls, remote access and log management, etc.
  • Finding the balance between security and features: Hardening’s policy should consider both the requirements of the security team and the ability of the IT team to implement it using currently assigned levels of time and manpower. It must also be decided which challenges must be faced and which are not worthwhile for operational times and costs.
  • Change management and “configuration drift” prevention: In Hardening, continuous monitoring must be implemented, where automation tools contribute to compliance with requirements at any time, getting rid of the need for constant scanning. Also, in unwanted changes, hardening policies that can happen in the production environment can be reinforced. Finally, in case of unauthorized changes, automation tools help detect anomalies and attacks to implement preventive actions.

2. Application Hardening

Protection of software applications running on the system, by removing or disabling unnecessary features, application-specific patching and security updates, along with safe coding practices and access controls, in addition to application-level authentication mechanisms. The importance of application security lies in the fact that users in the organization ask for safe and stable environments; on the part of the staff, patch and update application allows them to react to threats and implement preventive measures. Remember that users are often the entry point into the organization for cybercrime. Among the most common techniques, we can highlight:

  • Install applications only from trusted repositories.
  • Patch automations of standard and third-party applications.
  • Installation of firewalls, antivirus and malware or spyware protection programs.
  • Software-based data encryption.
  • Password management and encryption applications.

3. Operating System (OS) Hardening

Configuring the operating system to minimize vulnerabilities, either by disabling unnecessary services, shutting down unused ports, implementing firewalls and intrusion detection systems, enforcing strong password policies, and regularly applying security patches and updates. Among the most recommended methods, there are the following:

  • Applying the latest updates released by the operating system developer.
  • Enable built-in security features (Microsoft Defender or third-party Endpoint Protection platform software or EPP, Endpoint Detection Rate or EDR from third parties). This will perform a malware search on the system (Trojan horses, sniffer, password sniffers, remote control systems, etc.).
  • Remove unnecessary drivers and update used ones.
  • Delete software installed on the machine that is unnecessary.
  • Enable secure boot.
  • Restrict system access privileges.
  • Use biometrics or authentication FIDO (Fast Identity Online) in addition to passwords.

Also, a strong password policy can be implemented, protect sensitive data with AES encryption or self-encrypting drives, firmware resiliency technologies, and/or multi-factor authentication.

4. Server Hardening

Removing vulnerabilities (also known as attack vectors) that a hacker could use to access the server. It focuses on securing data, ports, components and server functions, implementing security protocols at hardware, firmware and software level. The following is recommended:

  • Patch and update your operating systems periodically.
  • Update third-party software needed to run your servers according to industry security standards.
  • Require users to create and maintain complex passwords consisting of letters, numbers, and special characters, and update these passwords frequently.
  • Lock an account after a certain number of failed login attempts.
  • Disable certain USB ports when a server is booted.
  • Leverage multi-factor authentication (MFA)
  • Using encryption AES or self-encrypted drives to hide and protect business-critical information.
  • Use virus and firewall protection and other advanced security solutions.

5. Network Hardening

Protecting network infrastructure and communication channels. It involves configuring firewalls, implementing intrusion prevention systems (IPS) and intrusion detection systems (IDS), encryption protocols such as SSL/TLS, and segmenting the network to reduce the impact of a breach and implement strong network access controls. It is recommended to combine IPS and IDS systems, in addition to:

  • Proper configuration of network firewalls.
  • Audits of network rules and access privileges.
  • Disable unnecessary network ports and network protocols.
  • Disable unused network services and devices.
  • Network traffic encryption.

It is worth mentioning that the implementation of robust monitoring and recording mechanisms is essential to strengthen our system. It involves setting up a security event log, monitoring system logs for suspicious activity, implementing intrusion detection systems, and conducting periodic security audits and reviews to identify and respond to potential threats in a timely manner.

Practical 9-Step Hardening Application

Although each organization has its particularities in business systems, there are general hardening tasks applicable to most systems. Below is a list of the most important tasks as a basic checklist:

1. Manage access: Ensure that the system is physically safe and that staff are informed about security procedures. Set up custom roles and strong passwords. Remove unnecessary users from the operating system and prevent the use of root or “superadmin” accounts with excessive privileges. Also, limit the membership of administrator groups: only grant elevated privileges when necessary.

2. Monitor network traffic: Install hardened systems behind a firewall or, if possible, isolated from public networks. A VPN or reverse proxy must be required to connect. Also, encrypt communications and establish firewall rules to restrict access to known IP ranges.

3. Patch vulnerabilities: Keep operating systems, browsers, and any other applications up to date and apply all security patches. It is recommended to keep track of vendor safety advisories and the latest CVEs.

4. Remove Unnecessary Software: Uninstall any unnecessary software and remove redundant operating system components. Unnecessary services and any unnecessary application components or functions that may expand the threat surface must be disabled.

5. Implement continuous monitoring: Periodically review logs for anomalous activity, with a focus on authentications, user access, and privilege escalation. Reflect records in a separate location to protect the integrity of records and prevent tampering. Conduct regular vulnerability and malware scans and, if possible, conduct an external audit or penetration test.

6. Implement secure communications: Secure data transfer using safe encryption. Close all but essential network ports and disable unsafe protocols such as SMBv1, Telnet, and HTTP.

7. Performs periodic backups: Hardened systems are, by definition, sensitive resources and should be backed up periodically using the 3-2-1 rule (three copies of the backup, on two types of media, with one copy stored off-site).

8. Strengthen remote sessions: If you must allow Secure Shell or SSH (remote administration protocol), make sure a safe password or certificate is used. The default port must be avoided, in addition to disabling elevated privileges for SSH access. Monitor SSH records to identify anomalous uses or privilege escalation.

9. Monitor important metrics for security:Monitor logs, accesses, number of connections, service load (CPU, Memory), disk growth. All these metrics and many more are important to find out if you are being subjected to an attack. Having them monitored and known in real time can free you from many attacks or service degradations.

Hardening on Pandora FMS

Pandora FMS incorporates a series of specific features to monitor server hardening, both Linux and Windows. For that, it runs a special plugin that will perform a series of checks, scoring whether or not it passes the registration. These checks are scheduled to run from time to time. The graphical interface structures what is found in different categories, and the evolution of system security over time can be visually analyzed, as a temporal graph. In addition, detailed technical reports can be generated for each machine, by groups or made comparative.

It is important to approach the security tasks of the systems in a methodical and organized way, attending first to the most critical and being methodical, in order to be able to do it in all systems equally. One of the fundamental pillars of computer security is the fact of not leaving cracks, if there is an entrance door, however small it may be, and as much as we secured the rest of the machines, it may be enough to have an intrusion in our systems.

The Center for Internet Security (CIS) leads the development of international hardening standards and publishes security guidelines to improve cybersecurity controls. Pandora FMS uses the recommendations of the CIS to implement a security audit system, integrated with monitoring to observe the evolution of Hardening throughout your organization, system by system.

Use of CIS Categories for Safety Checks

There are more than 1500 individual checks to ensure the security of systems managed by Pandora FMS. Next, we mention the CIS categories audited by Pandora FMS and some recommendations:

  • Hardware and software asset inventory and control
    It refers to all devices and software in your organization. Keeping an up-to-date inventory of your technology assets and using authentication to block unauthorized processes is recommended.
  • Device inventory and control
    It refers to identifying and managing your hardware devices so that only those who are authorized have access to systems. To do this, you have to maintain adequate inventory, minimize internal risks, organize your environment and provide clarity to your network.
  • Vulnerability Management
    Continuously scanning assets for potential vulnerabilities and remediating them before they become the gateway to an attack. Patch updating and security measures in the software and operating systems must be ensured.
  • Controlled use of administrative privileges
    It consists of monitoring access controls and user performance with privileged accounts to prevent any unauthorized access to critical systems. It must be ensured that only authorized people have elevated privileges to avoid any misuse of administrative privileges.
  • Safe hardware and software configuration
    Security configuration and maintenance based on standards approved by your organization. A rigorous configuration management system should be created, to detect and alert about any misconfigurations, along with a change control process to prevent attackers from taking advantage of vulnerable services and configurations.
  • Maintenance, supervision and analysis of audit logs and records
    Collection, administration and analysis of event audit logs to identify possible anomalies. Detailed logs are required to fully understand attacks and to be able to effectively respond to security incidents.
  • Defenses against malware
    Supervision and control of installation and execution of malicious code at multiple points in the organization to prevent attacks. Anti-malware software should be configured and used and take advantage of automation to ensure quick defense updates and swift corrective action in the event of attacks.
  • Email and Web Browser Protection
    Protecting and managing your web browsers and email systems against online threats to reduce the attack surface. Deactivate unauthorized email add-ons and ensure that users only access trusted websites using network-based URL filters. Remember to keep these most common gateways safe from attacks.
  • Data recovery capabilities
    Processes and tools to ensure your organization’s critical information is adequately supported. Make sure you have a reliable data recovery system in place to restore information in the event of attacks that compromise critical data.
  • Boundary defense and data protection
    Identification and classification of sensitive data, along with a number of processes including encryption, data leak protection plans, and data loss prevention techniques. It establishes strong barriers to prevent unauthorized access.
  • Account Monitoring and Control
    Monitor the entire lifecycle of your systems and application accounts, from creation through use and inactivity to deletion. This active management prevents attackers from taking advantage of legitimate but inactive user accounts for malicious purposes and allows them to maintain constant control over the accounts and their activities.
    It is worth mentioning that not all categories are applicable in a system, but there are controls to verify whether or not they apply. Let’s look at some screens as an example of display.

Detail example in a hardening control of a Linux (Debian) server

This control explains that it is advisable to disable the ICMP packet forwarding, as contemplated in the recommendations of CIS, PCI_DSS, NIST and TSC.

Example listing of checks by group (in this case, network security)

Example of controls, by category on a server:

The separation of the controls by category is key to be able to organize the work and to delimit the scope, for example, there will be systems not exposed to the network where you may “ignore” the network category, or systems without users, where you may avoid user control.

Example of the evolution of the hardening of a system over time:

This allows you to see the evolution of securitization in a system (or in a group of systems). Securitization is not an easy process, since there are dozens of changes, so it is important to address it in a gradual way, that is, planning their correction in stages, this should produce a trend over time, like the one you may see in the attached image. Pandora FMS is a useful tool not only for auditing, but also for monitoring the system securitization process.

Other additional safety measures related to hardening

  • Permanent vulnerability monitoring. Pandora FMS also integrates a continuous vulnerability detection system, based on mitre databases (CVE, Common Vulnerabilities and Exposure) and NIST to continuously audit vulnerable software across your organization. Both the agents and the remote Discovery component are used to determine on which of your systems there is software with vulnerabilities. More information here.
  • Flexibility in inventory: Whether you use Linux systems from different distributions or any Windows version, the important thing is to know and map our infrastructure well: installed software, users, paths, addresses, IP, hardware, disks, etc. Security cannot be guaranteed if you do not have a detailed inventory.
  • Constant monitoring of security infrastructure: It is important to monitor the status of specific security infrastructures, such as backups, antivirus, VPN, firewalls, IDs/IPS, SIEM, honeypots, authentication systems, storage systems, log collection, etc.
  • Permanent monitoring of server security: Verifying in real time the security of remote access, passwords, open ports and changes to key system files.
  • Proactive alerts: Not only do we help you spot potential security breaches, but we also provide proactive alerts and recommendations to address any issues before they become a real threat.

I invite you to watch this video about Hardening on Pandora FMS

Positive impact on safety and operability

As we have seen, hardening is part of the efforts to ensure business continuity. A proactive stance on server protection must be taken, prioritizing risks identified in the technological environment and applying changes gradually and logically. Patches and updates must be applied constantly as a priority, relying on automated monitoring and management tools that ensure the fast correction of possible vulnerabilities. It is also recommended to follow the best practices specific to each hardening area in order to guarantee the security of the whole technological infrastructure with a comprehensive approach.

Additional Resources

Links to Pandora FMS documentation or read the references to CIS security guidelines: See interview with Alexander Twaradze, Pandora FMS representative to countries implementing CIS standards.

Pandora FMS’s editorial team is made up of a group of writers and IT professionals with one thing in common: their passion for computer system monitoring. Pandora FMS’s editorial team is made up of a group of writers and IT professionals with one thing in common: their passion for computer system monitoring.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About PandoraFMS
Pandora FMS is a flexible monitoring system, capable of monitoring devices, infrastructures, applications, services and business processes.
Of course, one of the things that Pandora FMS can control is the hard disks of your computers.

A Closer Look at the New NSA Zero Trust Guidelines

The National Security Agency (NSA) has released its comprehensive set of zero trust network security guidelines. As stewards of national security, the agency’s pivot towards the a defined NSA zero trust model not only underscores its criticality but also serves as a beacon for organizations aiming to fortify their cyber defenses. The NSA Zero Trust security framework adheres to the President’s Executive Order of Improving the Nation’s Cybersecurity (EO 14028) and National Security Memorandum 8 (NSM-8). This exploration delves into the essence of these guidelines, providing a strategic overview, understanding the motivations behind their inception, and how they address the myriad pain points facing Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) today. Moreover, it casts a vision on how adopting these principles can pave the way for a more secure digital future.

The Essence of Zero Trust and Its Importance

Zero Trust represents a foundational shift in the security paradigm, transcending traditional boundaries to address the complexities of modern network environments. At its heart, Zero Trust embodies the philosophy of “never trust, always verify,” a crucial departure from past security models that operated under a presumption of trust once inside the network perimeter. This innovative approach acknowledges a critical reality: threats can and do emerge from both external and internal sources, necessitating a vigilant and unwavering scrutiny of all network traffic, irrespective of its origin.

The adoption of Zero Trust is imperative in an era where the digital landscape is both boundless and perpetually evolving. Traditional security measures falter in the face of sophisticated cyber threats that exploit the inherent trust in legacy systems. Zero Trust, by contrast, offers a robust and agile framework, capable of dynamically responding to and mitigating risks as they arise. It demands the comprehensive authentication of identities and stringent authorization of access rights, thereby ensuring that only validated users and devices can engage with critical network resources.

Furthermore, the principle of minimizing access to only what is necessary—often referred to as the principle of least privilege—serves to not only enhance security but also significantly reduce the potential impact of breaches by limiting unauthorized access to sensitive data and systems. This methodical constriction of access paths and stringent control mechanisms are pivotal in constructing a security architecture resilient to the multifaceted threats that besiege today’s digital enterprises.

In essence, Zero Trust is not merely a strategy but a necessity, a guiding beacon for organizations navigating the treacherous waters of cybersecurity. Its adoption heralds a proactive stance against the relentless tide of cyber threats, fortifying defenses and securing the future of digital enterprises in an ever-connected world.

The NSA’s Zero Trust Recommendations: A Strategic Overview

Within the ambit of the NSA’s strategic initiative to revolutionize network security, the agency’s zero trust guidelines emerge as a beacon of transformation, guiding organizations on a journey toward a more secure and resilient digital infrastructure. Central to these guidelines is the embrace of network segmentation—a sophisticated strategy that divides the network into smaller, discrete segments. This approach significantly hampers the ability of attackers to move laterally across the network, effectively containing potential breaches and minimizing their impact.

The guidelines underscore the imperative for robust authentication and authorization protocols. This involves establishing and enforcing stringent access controls, ensuring that only verified users and authenticated devices can access the network’s most sensitive and critical resources. Such a stance underscores a commitment to a foundational principle of Zero Trust: trust no entity without rigorous verification, irrespective of whether it originates from within or outside the organizational boundaries.

Moreover, the NSA places a premium on the continuous monitoring and real-time validation of all traffic, users, and devices within the network. This ongoing scrutiny serves as the bedrock for identifying and responding to anomalous behavior and potential security threats swiftly and efficiently. It’s a proactive stance that shifts the security posture from reactive to anticipatory, enabling organizations to preempt and neutralize threats before they can cause significant damage.

The NSA’s guidelines do not merely advocate for a set of practices but champion a comprehensive reimagining of network security architecture. This approach, deeply ingrained in the Zero Trust model, offers a structured and strategic pathway for organizations to enhance their cybersecurity resilience. It is a clarion call to action, urging the adoption of practices that align with the relentless evolution of cyber threats and the complex digital ecosystems of today’s organizations.

Unpacking the Reasons for the NSA’s Zero Trust Push

The impetus for the NSA’s endorsement of zero trust principles emanates from a prescient understanding of the contemporary cyber threat landscape and the exigencies of national security in the digital age. At the core of this strategic shift lies an acknowledgment of the inadequacies of traditional security frameworks in confronting the sophisticated and ever-evolving cyber threats that define the current epoch. Traditional defenses, premised on the notion of a secure perimeter, are increasingly obsolescent in a world where threat actors exploit the smallest vulnerabilities with relentless ingenuity and precision. Zero trust architecture, with its foundational axiom of “never trust, always verify,” introduces a paradigm well-suited to this new reality, where trust is not an inherited attribute but one that must be continually earned, verified, and re-verified.

Additionally, the NSA’s drive towards zero trust underscores a profound recognition of cybersecurity’s strategic role in safeguarding national interests. In an interconnected global environment, the frontlines of national security extend well into the digital realm. Cyber incidents have the potential not only to compromise sensitive information but also to disrupt critical infrastructure, with ramifications that can span the spectrum from economic turmoil to threats to physical safety. By promulgating zero trust principles, the NSA aims to fortify these digital frontlines, advocating for a security posture that is both dynamic and resilient, capable of thwarting adversaries and protecting the nation’s digital infrastructure against the specter of cyber warfare.

This concerted push for zero trust adoption reflects a deliberate strategy to elevate cybersecurity from a tactical concern to a cornerstone of national defense, ensuring that organizations are not merely reactive in the face of threats but are preemptively fortified against the diverse and sophisticated cyber challenges of tomorrow.

Addressing CISO Pain Points Through NSA Zero Trust

The NSA’s zero trust guidelines illuminate a transformative path for Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) besieged by the relentless advancement of cybersecurity threats and the pressing demand to judiciously allocate cybersecurity budgets. In the intricate dance of cyber defense, where every move counts and missteps can lead to significant vulnerabilities, the principles embedded in the NSA zero trust framework offer a strategic cadence for minimizing cybersecurity risks while optimizing resource allocation.

Implementing network segmentation, a cornerstone of the NSA’s recommendations, crafts a more defensible and controllable network landscape. This granular control effectively curtails the sprawl of breaches, creating barriers that confine potential attacks and minimize their operational impact. Such segmentation aligns with the CISO’s imperative to shield critical assets with precision, ensuring that the most sensitive segments of the network are insulated from unauthorized access and lateral movements by threat actors.

Continuous monitoring and validation, another pivotal tenet of the NSA’s zero trust model, dovetail with the necessity for real-time cyber threat detection and neutralization. This relentless vigilance ensures that anomalies are detected at their nascent stage, allowing for swift mitigation before they escalate into full-blown security incidents. This proactive stance not only enhances the security posture but also optimizes the deployment of cybersecurity resources, enabling a more effective and efficient allocation of the cybersecurity budget.

By adopting the NSA zero trust guidelines, CISOs can address the dual challenge of bolstering cyber defenses while ensuring the judicious use of limited resources. This strategic approach promises not just an elevation in security standards but also a recalibration of cybersecurity investments, ensuring that every dollar spent contributes directly to the resilience and robustness of the organization’s digital infrastructure.

The Road Ahead: Navigating Future Challenges with Zero Trust

Embarking on a journey with the NSA’s zero trust framework at the helm heralds a forward-thinking strategy essential for mastering the cybersecurity challenges that lie ahead. This paradigm shift towards a zero trust architecture is not just an adjustment in technical measures but a comprehensive redefinition of how security perimeters are conceptualized in an era where digital boundaries are increasingly fluid and expansive. The intricate digital ecosystems that define today’s organizational landscapes demand a security posture that is both agile and robust, capable of adapting to the incessant evolution of cyber threats with precision and resilience.

The integration of automation and advanced analytics into the zero trust model elevates its capability to preemptively identify and counteract threats, crafting a security environment where vigilance is continuous and intelligence-driven. This strategic amalgamation ensures that cybersecurity mechanisms are not only responsive but also predictive, staying ahead of potential threats through the nuanced understanding of patterns and behaviors that signify emerging risks.

Moreover, as organizations navigate the shifting sands of regulatory compliance, aligning with the NSA’s zero trust guidelines presents a proactive stance. This alignment not only fortifies the organization’s defense mechanisms but also ensures that it remains in step with the evolving landscape of cybersecurity regulations, thus safeguarding its operational legitimacy and reinforcing its commitment to exemplary cybersecurity governance.

In sum, embracing the NSA’s zero trust recommendations positions organizations to confront the future with a security stance that is dynamic, data-driven, and decisively proactive. It is a strategic imperative that champions not just the security of digital assets but the very future of secure digital innovation and growth.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

MSP vs. MSSP: what’s the difference?

Navigating the world of IT support and cybersecurity services can feel like exploring a maze. Two terms that often come up are MSP and MSSP. Though they sound similar, their roles in the IT ecosystem are distinct.

Let’s dive in to clarify these differences, helping you identify which service aligns best with your IT and cybersecurity needs.

What is an MSP?

An MSP, or Managed Service Provider, acts as your IT department’s extension or sometimes its entirety.

They manage a spectrum of IT services, from network and infrastructure to software management and support. MSPs aim to ensure your IT operations run smoothly, efficiently, and without interruption, focusing on maintenance and optimization.

What is an MSSP?

MSSP stands for Managed Security Service Provider. While MSPs cover the broader IT landscape, MSSPs focus on cybersecurity.

They monitor and manage your security devices and systems and offer threat intelligence, incident response, and more. Essentially, they’re your cybersecurity guardians, proactively defending your digital assets against threats.

Key differences between MSP and MSSP

MSPs serve as a full IT department, offering various services like network management and software updates. Their primary goal is to ensure the seamless operation and reliability of your IT infrastructure. MSPs are the technology stewards, ensuring your systems are efficient, up-to-date, and scalable to support your business objectives.

MSSPs focus narrowly yet deeply on cybersecurity, acting as vigilant protectors against cyber threats. They specialize in monitoring, managing, and responding to security risks, employing a suite of services designed to protect businesses from digital dangers. Their services range from real-time threat monitoring to incident response and compliance management, all aimed at fortifying your organization’s cybersecurity posture.

To neatly summarize the distinctions, let’s lay MSP vs. MSSP out in a table:

MSP vs MSSP: the key differencesHere’s a breakdown of their primary differences:

MSPs focus on the broader spectrum of managing and optimizing IT infrastructure and operations. They offer a wide range of services, including:

  • Managing networks, servers, and cloud services

  • Providing software management and updates

  • Help desk support and IT consulting.

The core objective of MSPs is to enhance operational efficiency and support business growth, acting essentially as an outsourced IT department.

MSSPs, on the other hand, specialize in protecting businesses from cyber threats and ensuring data security. Their services are centered around:

  • Incident response

  • Compliance management

  • Security assessments.

They use advanced methods to detect and prevent cyber threats, acting as a dedicated cybersecurity team for their clients.

While MSPs are all about ensuring that the IT infrastructure is running smoothly to support and enhance business operations. MSSPs, on the other hand, dive deeper into the cybersecurity aspect, ensuring that businesses are safeguarded against the increasing number of cyber threats.

Whether a business opts for an MSP or an MSSP depends on its primary needs: comprehensive IT management or specialized cybersecurity protection.

Click to tweet

In many cases, businesses benefit from the combined strengths of both types of providers to ensure both operational excellence and robust security.

What is the difference between MSSP and MDR?

While MSSPs focus on managing and monitoring security services, MDR (Managed Detection and Response) providers take a more hands-on approach to actively hunting, detecting, and responding to threats. Think of MSSPs as your cybersecurity watchdogs, while MDR services are the special forces that detect and neutralize threats.

MSP and MSSP: the market growth

The global managed services market has seen consistent growth, driven by businesses’ increasing reliance on IT infrastructure and the need for efficient, scalable solutions.

According to projections, this market could grow significantly, reaching a substantial valuation by 2028. This growth is fueled by the ongoing digital transformation in various sectors, necessitating managed IT services to support operations, data management, cloud services, and customer relations.

The managed security services market is also on a robust growth trajectory, with a specific focus on cybersecurity services.

The escalating threat landscape propels this market’s expansion, regulatory compliance requirements, and the complexity of cybersecurity solutions. Businesses are increasingly outsourcing their cybersecurity needs to MSSPs to protect against data breaches and cyber-attacks and to ensure data privacy and compliance with regulations.

Factors defining MSP market growth

  • Digital transformation: as businesses continue to digitize operations, the demand for comprehensive IT services, including cloud management, data analytics, and network infrastructure, grows.

  • Cost efficiency: MSPs offer a cost-effective solution for businesses to manage their IT needs without the overhead of an in-house IT department.

  • Scalability and flexibility: the ability of MSPs to scale services according to business needs is a key driver, allowing companies to adjust their IT services based on growth and seasonal demands.

Factors responsible for MSSP market growth

  • Cybersecurity challenges: the increasing sophistication of cyber threats drives demand for MSSPs as businesses seek specialized expertise to navigate the complex cybersecurity landscape.

  • Regulatory compliance: With growing regulatory pressures around data protection, businesses turn to MSSPs for compliance assurance and to avoid potential fines.

  • Advanced threat detection and response: the need for 24/7 monitoring and quick response to security incidents has become critical, making MSSPs an essential partner for businesses.

Market differences

While both MSPs and MSSPs are integral to the IT and cybersecurity ecosystem, their markets differ primarily in focus and expertise.

MSPs are broad, covering all aspects of IT management and support, catering to businesses’ operational and efficiency needs. In contrast, MSSPs are specialized, focusing solely on cybersecurity services to protect businesses from digital threats and ensure compliance with data protection laws.

The MSP market is defined by its operational support and infrastructure management role, appealing to businesses looking for end-to-end IT services. The MSSP market, however, is driven by the need for specialized cybersecurity services, attracting businesses focused on enhancing their security posture in the face of increasing cyber threats.

Can an MSP be an MSSP?

Yes, the line between MSPs and MSSPs can blur. Some MSPs evolve to include MSSP functions, offering a hybrid model that covers both IT management and security services. This evolution reflects the growing importance of cybersecurity across all IT operations.

The managed service provider can indeed evolve into a Managed Security Service Provider. Still, this transformation requires a strategic approach, significant investment in skills and technology, and a commitment to adopting a security-first mindset.

Why make the transition?

The move from MSP to MSSP is often motivated by the growing demand for cybersecurity services. Businesses are increasingly aware of the risks posed by cyber threats and are seeking providers that can offer both IT management and robust security measures. By transitioning to an MSSP, providers can meet this demand, offering a one-stop shop for IT and security needs.

Moreover, this evolution allows providers to differentiate themselves in a crowded market, offering added value to clients through specialized security solutions. It also opens up new revenue streams, as businesses are willing to invest significantly in cybersecurity to protect their assets and reputation.

 

What are the deciding factors when choosing between an MSP and an MSSP for your business?

Comparing MSP vs. MSSP for your business comes down to understanding your core IT infrastructure management and cybersecurity needs. Here’s a streamlined approach to making that decision:

  • Assess business IT capabilities: if a business lacks a dedicated IT department or needs to augment its existing IT capabilities, an MSP might be the right fit. MSPs provide comprehensive IT services, ensuring your infrastructure is robust and up-to-date, with increased efficiency supporting your business operations.

  • Evaluate security requirements: if you’re particularly concerned about cybersecurity, face stringent regulatory compliance requirements, or handle sensitive data, leaning towards an MSSP makes sense. MSSPs specialize in protecting businesses from cyber threats with services like real-time monitoring, incident response, and compliance management.

  • Consider business size and sector: small to medium-sized businesses often find MSPs suitable for their broader IT needs, while larger organizations or those in high-risk sectors (e.g., finance, healthcare) may prioritize the specialized security services of an MSSP.

  • Budget and investment: determine the budget for IT and cybersecurity services. MSPs can offer more predictable costs for a range of IT services, while MSSPs might represent a higher investment focused on advanced security measures.

  • Future growth and scalability: think about business future needs. An MSP can help scale the IT infrastructure as your business grows, whereas an MSSP will ensure your cybersecurity posture scales in tandem with your risk exposure.

Selecting either an MSP or an MSSP boils down to understanding your specific needs:

Factors when choosing between an MSP and an MSSP

How NordLayer boosts MSP capabilities

Third-party providers like NordLayer step in as a powerful solution for MSPs, enhancing their capabilities to manage and secure networks with comprehensive security solutions. It offers features like Secure Remote Access, Zero Trust network architecture, and advanced threat protection.

  • Security monitoring. NordLayer amplifies MSPs’ ability to offer continuous security monitoring, which is crucial for early threat detection and maintaining a vigilant cybersecurity posture. This ensures clients are protected around the clock from a broad spectrum of cyber threats.

  • Security operations. With NordLayer’s security solutions, MSPs can enhance their security operations through automation and advanced analytics, speeding up incident response and bolstering defenses against evolving cyber threats, thereby elevating the level of service to clients.

  • Endpoint protection. NordLayer supports MSPs in implementing robust endpoint protection and safeguarding client devices against malware and other attacks, which is essential for the integrity and security of client networks.

  • Data protection. By offering encryption and secure access controls, NordLayer assists MSPs in protecting clients’ sensitive data against unauthorized access, aligning with information security regulations, and enhancing clients’ trust.

  • Cloud services. NordLayer enables secure access to cloud services, protecting data in transit to and from the cloud, an essential feature for businesses leveraging cloud-based solutions and security operations in today’s digital environment.

  • Providing cybersecurity services. Integrating NordLayer allows MSPs to expand their cybersecurity services, covering everything from security monitoring to data protection, meeting the increasing demand for comprehensive cybersecurity solutions.

These tools bolster an MSP’s service offering and ensure clients’ networks are both accessible and secure. By performing risk assessment and integrating NordLayer, MSPs can provide a more robust IT and security infrastructure, reflecting the synergy between comprehensive IT support and dedicated cybersecurity measures.

Are you looking for a trusted partner to secure your clients’ networks? NordLayer offers a Partner Program with a focus on tangible benefits for its partners and simple yet effective solutions to protect businesses in the hectic cybersecurity landscape.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About NordLayer
NordLayer is an adaptive network access security solution for modern businesses – from the world’s most trusted cybersecurity brand, Nord Security.

The web has become a chaotic space where safety and trust have been compromised by cybercrime and data protection issues. Therefore, our team has a global mission to shape a more trusted and peaceful online future for people everywhere.

24.3.1 Voyager released

Changes compared to 24.3.0

New Features

  • Added a new restore option to only overwrite existing files if there is a difference in file content already written to the restore location

Enhancements

  • Backup job logs now appear in the Console app on macOS
  • Installing the Comet Client on Linux devices no longer echoes password characters to the terminal
  • Improved the performance of the Comet Server when a large number of devices resume their live connection

Bug Fixes

  • Fixed an issue with macOS installs where the Comet version was not being reported
  • Fixed an issue causing unexpected entries to appear in the snapshot browser and the subsequent restore to fail when restoring from a Hyper-V snapshot using the Comet Server web interface if a VHDX file appears at the root of the snapshot
  • Fixed an issue causing no default restore type to be selected in the restore dialog of the Comet Server web interface for Hyper-V and VMware restores
  • Fixed an issue causing “undefined” to appear in the breadcrumb in the snapshot browser when restoring from a Disk Image/Hyper-V/VMware snapshot using the Comet Server web interface
  • Fixed an issue with tenant email reporting when using the test button as a top-level admin in the Comet Server web interface. The test email is now correctly filtered to the expected tenant
  • Fixed an issue with the Protected Items table in the Users page on the Comet Server web interface where it was not possible to run a backup from any page other than the first page
  • Fixed an issue where backup jobs could complete successfully when a previous retention pass failed. Backup jobs are now blocked until retention pass errors are resolved
  • Fixed an issue when backing up a VMware virtual disk on a vSAN datastore
  • Fixed an issue with user email reporting not being enabled by default
  • Fixed an issue causing errors when attempting to begin an OpenID Connect authentication process to fail to display in the browser and cURL
  • Fixed an issue with restore jobs under reporting the Downloaded size
  • Fixed an issue with the Comet Server web interface failing to display the users page
  • Fixed an issue applying language selections in the Comet Server web interface

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Comet
We are a team of dedicated professionals committed to developing reliable and secure backup solutions for MSP’s, Businesses and IT professionals. With over 10 years of experience in the industry, we understand the importance of having a reliable backup solution in place to protect your valuable data. That’s why we’ve developed a comprehensive suite of backup solutions that are easy to use, scalable and highly secure.

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

Social Chat is free, download and try it now here!

×