Skip to content

AI-Powered Identity Authentication Is Here: What You Need To Know

It should come as no surprise that identity authentication is one of the most critical aspects of doing business in the digital age. Without verifying your users are who they say they are, you leave the doors open for fraud, data breaches, and harmful cyber attacks. But with the advent of AI, identity authentication is going through a transformation. To understand how, let’s dive into everything you need to know about AI authentication.

How Is AI Helping With Identity Verification?

Traditional authentication methods are becoming less effective today due to high levels of password reuse and the increasing number of stolen credentials available on dark web databases from previous data breaches. Luckily, AI can provide better, more secure authentication by going beyond traditional boundaries and incorporating data context, biometrics, and patterns in user behavior.

What Are the Different Types of AI Authentication?

Biometric authentication is especially popular with cyber-defense-minded companies today, and AI plays a huge role here. Some examples include keystroke dynamics (typing pattern), behavioral biometrics (analyzing user behavioral patterns to create cyber fingerprints), facial recognition, and voice recognition.

Behavioral biometrics, in particular, is quickly becoming the favored type of AI verification today. Why? Because behavioral biometrics can provide continuous authentication by tracking and verifying user behavior like typing rhythm, mouse movement, and device usage patterns. In addition, it also provides a more seamless and frictionless authentication experience, as it doesn’t require users to remember or enter passwords.

And critically, these identity authentication tools are only possible with artificial intelligence and machine learning. These technologies rely on highly precise authentication driven by large data sets and advanced algorithms. And as a result, they’re almost impossible for fraudsters to bypass.

How do AI Authentication Systems Mitigate AI Bias?

“AI bias” refers to the tendency of artificial intelligence algorithms and systems to perpetuate and amplify existing biases and discrimination in the data they are trained on and in the decisions they make.

There are several ways in which AI authentication systems can mitigate bias:

  1. Diverse training data: Using a diverse and representative dataset for training the AI system can help reduce bias and improve accuracy for underrepresented groups.
  2. Fairness algorithms: These algorithms can help identify and address bias in AI systems by balancing accuracy across different demographic groups.
  3. Human oversight: Having human oversight and review in the development and deployment of AI systems can help ensure that potential biases are identified and addressed.
  4. Regular monitoring and evaluation: Regular monitoring of the AI system’s performance and outcomes can help identify any potential biases that may emerge over time and allow for appropriate corrective actions to be taken.
  5. Transparency and accountability: Making AI systems transparent and accountable can help increase trust in the technology and promote responsible use.

These measures can help mitigate AI bias in authentication systems and ensure that they are fair, unbiased, and effective in protecting the privacy and security of users.

Final Thoughts

The use of AI in cybersecurity is nothing new, but it is becoming increasingly powerful and more widespread. Today, more and more companies are looking to AI authentication to help safeguard their systems from nefarious actors.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

How Does Passwordless Authentication Fit With Zero Trust Security Models?

Will 2023 be the year we finally eliminate passwords? For the last decade, cybersecurity experts have both been pushing for and predicting that a passwordless future is just around the corner. However, while passwords have been declining in recent years in favor of more robust forms of authentication, an entirely passwordless future has yet to materialize.

But that all could be set to change with the increased adoption of zero trust security models. Zero trust does away with implicit trust and requires all users and devices, whether inside or outside the corporate network, to be continuously authenticated and authorized. And critically, zero trust is also starting to mean zero passwords. But why?

Let’s dive into why passwordless authentication is important and how it fits into zero trust security models.

What is Passwordless Authentication?

As the term suggests, passwordless authentication is a way of verifying a user’s identity with something other than a password. Common types of passwordless authentication include email-based or SMS-based one-time codes, multi-factor authentication, and biometrics.

Biometrics are increasingly favored over other types of passwordless authentication because they’re virtually impossible for hackers to imitate, and they reduce user friction. Some examples of biometric authentication include retinal scans, voiceprints, facial recognition, fingerprint scans, and biometric mouse movements.

As the term suggests, passwordless authentication is a way of verifying a user’s identity with something other than a password. Common types of passwordless authentication include email-based or SMS-based one-time codes, multi-factor authentication, and biometrics.

Biometrics are increasingly favored over other types of passwordless authentication because they’re virtually impossible for hackers to imitate, and they reduce user friction. Some examples of biometric authentication include retinal scans, voiceprints, facial recognition, fingerprint scans, and biometric mouse movements.

Why Use Passwordless Authentication?

Here’s what it comes down to; passwordless authentication is simply more secure than password-based authentication.

While businesses have relied on passwords for decades, they’re no longer considered a secure way to protect our accounts and corporate networks. For example, 44% of employees reuse passwords across personal and work-related accounts. Moreover, most passwords are extremely easy to guess – the top five passwords globally are “123456”, “Password,” “12345678”, “qwerty,” and “123456789”.

As a result, hackers have long favored password attacks to breach corporate networks or personal accounts. Many different password attack methods exist, but the most common are:

  • Brute-force attacks: This hacking method uses trial and error to crack passwords, typically using lists of common passwords or leaked passwords obtained from the dark web.
  • Surgical attacks: These are a type of targeted attack where the hacker researches the intended victim, scouring their public accounts to find key details like their birthday, favorite sports team, hobbies, names of their children, etc., that the user may use in passwords.
  • Phishing/Social engineering: Here, cybercriminals pose as a trusted entity like a well-known company or another employee and trick the target into sharing their login details via a fraudulent login screen. Other methods include sending emails with a malicious link that automatically installs key-logging malware on the victim’s computer.

But by opting for passwordless authentication, you can eliminate or vastly reduce the risk of falling victim to these types of attacks.

There are also other reasons to move away from passwords. For example, passwordless authentication is more convenient for workers because it leverages something the user has or something inherent to them, eliminating the need for them to remember anything. This also means employees can log into devices faster.

Rising Zero Trust Adoption

72% of organizations are in the process of adopting zero trust or have already implemented it. Moreover, an eye-watering 90% of organizations say that advancing zero trust is one of their top three IT and security priorities. But why exactly is zero trust becoming so widespread?

Adopting a zero trust approach can the cost of a data breach by approximately $1.76 million and offer boosted efficiencies that amount to savings of 40 manhours per week. Moreover, companies that leverage zero trust network segmentation (an element of ZTNA) are two times more likely to avoid critical outages due to security incidents.

Undoubtedly, the need for continuous authentication is rising as remote working, and distributed workforces become more common. Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) is a critical set of technologies and functionalities here, enabling remote users to access internal applications securely. ZTNA is fast becoming essential for businesses in the modern world.

Can You Have Password-Based Zero Trust?

Yes, and many organizations do. However, cybersecurity experts are now warning that password-based zero trust does not meet the defense demands of the increasingly severe cyber threatscape of today.

Why Passwordless Zero Trust Is the Way Forward

Here’s the bottom line. Passwords are not only weak forms of security, but they also make your zero trust program slower, more expensive, and less effective.

Passwords require more tools, which drives up costs. Additional tools demand more administrators, new user licenses, and often more training for users and the help desk. All of these factors result in a more expensive security program.

Additionally companies that use passwords in conjunction with MFA often still have security gaps. This is typically because legacy systems or otherwise awkward technologies don’t play well with some MFA tools, leaving specific corporate systems protected only by passwords. There can also be MFA gaps in workstation login, VPNs, RDPs, and VDIs or IoT devices where passwords are the default.

Lastly, there are resource constraints involved with managing robust password-based security. IT and security teams are often understaffed and overwhelmed, and the current cybersecurity skills gap exacerbates this problem. Moreover, rising economic uncertainty puts more pressure on businesses of all sizes to reduce their IT budgets and take cost-cutting measures.

In this increasingly severe climate, security teams are feeling the pains of passwords more than ever before. By taking passwords out of the equation, organizations can reduce the labor burden on already over-stretched security workers and give them more time to spend on proactive cybersecurity measures.

Final Thoughts

Credential stuffing may be one of the oldest attack methods, but it’s still going strong today. For example, credential stuffing attacks became so prevalent in the first quarter of 2022 that attack traffic surpassed legitimate login traffic in some countries. And equally concerning, the first half of 2022 saw more attacks against MFA than any previous year.

Simply put, cybercriminals are increasingly targeting our traditional defense measures, namely passwords and MFA. As a result, companies embarking on their zero trust journey need to move away from passwords and weaker forms of MFA in favor of more robust passwordless authentication.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

Understanding the Ins & Outs of Cyber Risk Quantification

Introduction

In today’s digital world, cyber risk is high and growing. The best way to control this risk is with a proactive cyber security strategy that quantifies and measures your company’s vulnerability to theft, fraud, or data breach.

The cyber threat landscape is diverse, and there is a wide range of potential threats in this sector, such as intellectual property theft, ransomware, data breaches, DDoS attacks, and insider threats. As cyber criminals improve on new methods for making threats, it is therefore important for cyber security professionals to be on top of where the latest threats are to hide from evolving threats. But for a company to achieve this, it must first understand the risks of cybersecurity, be vigilant in its security stance, and be aware of its accompanying risks.

Cyber risk quantification (CRQ) is the primary route to understanding the cyber threat landscape and mitigating risks within a cyber security environment. Cyber risk quantification is also part of Cyber Security Risk Management and is a crucial part of an organization’s overall security posture. It involves assessing risks relating to various cybersecurity topics, such as vulnerabilities, threats and impacts. Quantification addresses measurement, tracking and reporting on the risks relating to specific topics to prepare for cyberattacks effectively.

Risk quantification is determining how likely a threat or attack is to be successful against your organization and then assessing the severity of such an event. Cyber risk quantification is a part of this process, and it pertains specifically to threats that target information on computer networks or in physical systems, like computer networks or smartphones. These include both internal threats (such as employees) and those from external sources (hackers).

Risk quantification is an enterprise tool to help them understand their existing cyber risk environment. It also enables them to devise effective strategies for reducing those risks by implementing appropriate controls.

 

What is Cyber Risk Quantification?

This process of cyber risk quantification has been described as a three-step process: identifying the “pen-testing assets”, counting vulnerabilities, and measuring the potential threats. These steps represent a holistic approach, allowing a comprehensive view of one’s cyber risk posture and its vulnerabilities, threats, and risks.

At its core, cyber risk quantification is not a specific set of rules or methodologies but rather a method for conducting a rigorous, in-depth analysis of subjecting any IT infrastructure. The intent is to obtain objective evidence to develop strategies for reducing risks and ultimately strengthening an organization’s cyber resilience.

Benefits of Cyber Risk Quantification

Cyber risk quantification is important in ensuring that cyber threats are understood and can help cyber security teams analyse vulnerabilities and risks and create cyber risk mitigation strategies. The following are the benefits of cyber risk quantification.

Provides Insights into Vulnerabilities

An analysis of the information technology assets allows companies to understand their cyber risk posture and quantify their security vulnerabilities. The process makes companies feel more secure in knowing they are not as vulnerable as they originally assumed.

Helps Identify & Mitigate Threats

Cyber risk quantification is a process that helps identify the number of potential threats within an organization. It helps determine what the company needs to do to prevent a cyber attack.

Provides Information for Basing Decisions

The cyber risk quantification process allows the creation of an actionable and detailed plan for organizations to make informed decisions about protecting themselves from cyberattacks.

Helps Identify the Need for Resources

Companies can use the cyber risk quantification process results to determine what resources are required to reduce or eliminate current organizational threats and vulnerabilities.

Risk Management Decision

After a cyber risk quantification process, one can better understand their current security posture and related cyber risks to well-informed decisions about reducing this risk.

Automating the Process

Can automate cyber risk quantification to save time and labour. It means that technicians will not have to spend time performing cyber risk quantification on each piece of information technology equipment.

Cost-Effective

The overall cost of implementing cyber risk quantification will not be much more than processing a security vulnerability assessment.

 

Determining the Company’s Cyber Tolerance

Can use the information obtained for identifying and developing cybersecurity strategies for the foreseeable future. It means that the consequences of an attack during this planning period are less severe than those that would experience after a cyber attack once an organization has planned out their cyber security strategy.

Determining the Potential Cost of a Cyber Attack

Companies can use cyber risk quantification to estimate the cost of a successful attack and use this to determine how much money should be allocated towards mitigating the impact of an attack.

Planning Effective Training Programs

The results of a cyber risk quantification process can be used to create more effective training programs and plan for an organization’s IT infrastructure training needs.

 

How to Leverage on Cyber Risk Quantification

Cyber risk quantification can be leveraged on the following levels:

Organizational Levels

The senior management of an organization needs to determine the organizational level of cyber risk quantification. The level at which this model is used will depends on how large and how organized an organization is.

For example, an enterprise with thousands of employees or many systems will benefit from applying this model at a higher level (e.g., enterprise-wide) than a smaller company that runs just one corporate system.

Site Level

Organizationally focused cyber risk quantification methods can be applied to each site. It is the level at which most companies are structured; they have one or a few locations and may have dozens of sites. The IT personnel at each site may also not have direct access to all the data needed for an effective cyber risk quantification model.

Process Level

Many organizations are involved in processing large amounts of data (e.g. processing credit card information or handling employee information). These organizations can apply the same data processing methodologies to cyber risk quantification and perform a different amount of manual data analysis.

Asset Level

Cyber risk quantification can be applied to a specific asset (e.g., a server, router, switch). It is an effective method for performing cyber risk quantification on small network environments or those with limited access to the underlying devices on a network.

Information System Level

This level is useful for the entire IT infrastructure. Most organizations would benefit from a more holistic enterprise approach to cyber risk quantification.

Individual Asset Level

Some organizations may have large network environments that do not need a holistic enterprise-level approach to quantifying cyber risk. Some systems are relatively small and easy to manage individually with minimal use of IT resources.

Application Component Level

An individual application component (e.g. a web server) is typically not a significant resource on its own, and it has unique vulnerabilities that need to be fixed. In most instances, cyber risk quantification of an application component will include looking at its counterpart components. It would be a rare occurrence for those performing cyber risk quantification on an individual asset level.

Challenges of Cyber Risk Quantification

Cyber risk quantification is a challenging task because of the numerous variables can have an impact on how risks are quantified. Some of the most common factors that have to be considered when performing cyber risk quantification include:

Data Visibility

The amount of data for analysis is often limited in the cyber risk quantification process. It means that the available data has to be collected from a relatively small number of sources and then analyzed using an automated method.

Can’t Calculate Risk

Cyber risk quantification could be a better science. Often, organizations will need a higher level of understanding concerning the vulnerabilities they are trying to quantify and the impact a successful cyber attack would have on their company.

Partial Remediation

Sometimes, a company can perform some level of remediation, but not all of its IT infrastructure components. It is often the case in smaller companies where policy and security costs can be very high.

Time Frame of Analysis

Cyber threat intelligence is always changing, and so is the level of risk for an organization, even for an asset within that organization. Cyber risk quantification models must be set up to keep pace with these changes.

Data Manipulation

The information is also analyzed against other data that has been manipulated and stored for analysis. While this does not mean that all data is manipulated, it does mean that some data may have been tampered with or changed to alter the analysis’s findings (e.g., personal information).

No Consistent Methodology

Cyber risk quantification is not an exact science; therefore, it cannot be performed consistently.

No Standardization

The model used for cyber risk quantification may depend on the organization and the structure of its IT infrastructure. It is challenging to translate results from one organization to another or even use it across various industries.

No Known Method

Studies have shown that industry and IT experts do not widely accept any known cyber threat quantification methodology.

 

Conclusion

Cyber risk quantification stands as an emerging field in cybersecurity, that will undoubtedly play an increasingly crucial role in the future of cybersecurity for assessing organizational risk before potential attacks occur.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

Top Network Access Control Challenges and How to Tackle Them

Network Access Control (NAC) is an essential component of any modern corporate network security plan. In fact, access control is one of the most important measures for protecting information and system resources. With the growing sophistication of cyber threats, network administrators face several challenges in implementing and managing NAC.

Overcoming Visibility Concerns in Network Access

Ensuring a high level of visibility into network access remains a key requirement for efficient NAC management. When network administrators are in the dark about who is accessing the network or what devices are in use, enforcing robust security controls becomes a monumental challenge. To overcome this, the adoption of a sophisticated NAC solution is advisable. These systems provide the much-needed advantage of real-time monitoring and comprehensive reporting, thereby offering invaluable insights into users and devices on the network. Armed with this information, administrators can proactively identify and neutralize potential threats to network security, creating a stronger, more resilient infrastructure.

Further enhancement to visibility can be achieved through the integration of machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies. These advanced tools can automate the process of monitoring network traffic, identifying patterns, and flagging unusual behavior that may indicate a potential security risk.

Not to be overlooked is the importance of having clear, well-defined security policies. Such guidelines help ensure all network users and devices are appropriately accounted for and have the necessary permissions for network access. Regular reviews and updates of these policies are crucial to maintaining a robust and relevant network access control framework.

In addition, conducting regular network access audits is a highly effective strategy. These audits not only identify potential vulnerabilities but also provide an opportunity for administrators to evaluate and improve their current NAC strategies.

In summary, tackling visibility concerns in network access requires a multifaceted approach that involves the use of advanced NAC solutions, integration of AI and machine learning technologies, effective security policies, and regular network audits. With these measures in place, network administrators can rest assured that they have a clear and comprehensive understanding of their network access landscape, significantly enhancing their ability to safeguard against potential security threats.

Managing Unauthorized Access

Controlling unauthorized network access is paramount in maintaining a secure environment. Unwanted external intruders or even internal personnel can become significant threats if they gain access without appropriate permissions. One effective method of counteracting this challenge is the execution of stringent access control policies. These policies can dictate what level of access each user has, limiting their ability to interact with sensitive areas of the network.

Technologies such as two-factor authentication (2FA) and biometric identification can be powerful tools in this context. Implementing 2FA adds an extra layer of security by requiring users to provide two distinct forms of identification before granting access. Biometric identification, on the other hand, leverages unique physical or behavioral characteristics of individuals to authenticate their identity. This could range from fingerprint scanning to facial recognition, making it significantly harder for unauthorized users to gain network access.

In addition to the above, smart cards can offer a physical token-based approach to authenticate and verify users. The advantage of smart cards lies in their capability to store and process data securely, thus providing an added layer of protection.

To further fortify network security, regular network access audits should be performed. Such audits serve the dual purpose of identifying weak spots where unauthorized access may occur and confirming that all current access control measures are functioning effectively. By routinely scrutinizing the network access landscape, potential vulnerabilities can be spotted and rectified promptly, thus preventing them from being exploited by unauthorized users.

Adopting and Integrating Cloud-native Security Products

The progressive migration of businesses towards cloud platforms calls for a comprehensive strategy to incorporate cloud-native security products. This endeavor, while promising in terms of enhanced flexibility and scalability, can present its own set of network access control challenges.

To successfully integrate cloud-native security products, the initial focus should be on the compatibility of these tools with your cloud platform. Network administrators need to select security solutions that align seamlessly with the specific cloud services in use, thereby ensuring a smoother transition and optimal performance.

One critical aspect is the support for similar protocols and standards between your cloud service provider and the security product. A failure in this synchronization can lead to unnecessary complexities and vulnerabilities in your security posture. Thus, it’s crucial to validate this compatibility ahead of time to prevent such issues.

Also noteworthy is the ability of these security tools to provide a unified and cohesive security stance. An ideal security product should not operate in isolation but should provide an integrated view of security across all the deployed cloud services. This integration reduces the burden of managing disparate systems, saving time, and reducing the complexity for network administrators.

In addition, organizations need to ensure that these security tools are capable of addressing their unique needs and specific threat landscapes. This could include features like data encryption, intrusion detection, compliance monitoring, or vulnerability scanning, among others. The suitability of these features should be evaluated based on the organization’s risk profile and regulatory requirements.

Lastly, consider the scalability and adaptability of the chosen cloud-native security product. As your organization grows and your cloud environment expands, your security solution should be able to scale accordingly. This adaptability prevents future investments in new tools to meet increased security needs.

Budget Constraints for Investing in New Security Technology

Financial limitations can often impede the procurement of advanced security technologies, posing unique budget-related network access control challenges for network administrators. The issue becomes more profound when the rising cybersecurity threats necessitate continuous updates to the security arsenal. However, there are strategic ways to overcome this obstacle.

To begin, organizations should prioritize their investments by analyzing their specific risk profiles and business needs. Deploying a risk-based approach to security investments ensures resources are allocated to areas that carry the highest risk or impact. Therefore, instead of spreading a limited budget thinly across numerous tools, this approach allows organizations to invest effectively in a few, essential security measures.

Leveraging open-source security solutions can provide a cost-efficient route to improved network security. While it may not offer the exact features of premium tools, these solutions can provide a basic level of protection against common network threats. Additionally, the open-source community often provides ongoing updates, ensuring the software remains effective against evolving threats. However, it’s crucial to assess the quality and reliability of open-source solutions before integrating them into your network.

A Security-as-a-Service (SECaaS) model can be a viable alternative for organizations with limited budgets. Rather than investing in individual security products, SECaaS provides an array of comprehensive security services on a subscription basis. This model not only enables organizations to access top-tier security solutions but also reduces the cost and complexity associated with their management and maintenance.

Furthermore, organizations can consider cooperative purchasing arrangements, where multiple organizations join to negotiate better pricing with vendors, or leasing arrangements, which can spread the cost over time and improve cash flow management.

The final consideration is investing in employee training. An educated workforce can act as a powerful line of defense, reducing the likelihood of expensive security breaches caused by human error. Though often overlooked, this is a cost-effective approach to improving network security without the need for significant investment in technology.

Managing Network Access Control from Multiple Locations

As organizations increasingly adopt distributed and remote work models, new network access control challenges involving managing diverse geographical locations has arisen. Maintaining the integrity and security of the network while providing adequate access to remote employees requires a nuanced and robust approach.

To tackle this challenge effectively, the implementation of centralized network management systems is crucial. These systems empower network administrators to control and monitor network access from any location, ensuring seamless operations despite geographical boundaries. With such systems, administrators can enforce uniform security policies, detect potential threats, and respond swiftly to security incidents across all network access points.

Furthermore, deploying Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) is an effective strategy for remote network access control. VPNs offer secure encrypted tunnels for data transmission between the user and the network, thereby protecting the data from interception. For added security, administrators can combine VPN usage with Multi-factor Authentication (MFA), which requires users to verify their identities through multiple methods before granting network access.

The advent of Software Defined Perimeter (SDP) technology can also prove beneficial in managing NAC from multiple locations. SDP solutions, also known as Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA), create individualized perimeters for each user, granting them access only to the specific resources they need. This approach minimizes the attack surface and reduces the risk of internal threats.

However, as the network extends beyond the traditional boundaries, the need for advanced security tools becomes paramount. Solutions such as Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) can help monitor and protect the network from potential threats, regardless of the user’s location.

Finally, regularly conducting network access audits can aid in identifying potential weak spots and inconsistencies in access control. These audits can reveal any discrepancies in the application of security policies across locations, providing valuable insights for enhancing the overall NAC strategy.

By embracing these solutions and strategies, organizations can successfully manage network access control from multiple locations, thereby ensuring business continuity and robust security in a distributed work environment.

Dealing with Insider Threats and Rogue Network Access Points

In the ever-evolving landscape of network security, managing insider threats and rogue network access points can pose a significant challenge. Both these elements can stealthily create vulnerabilities within the system, making detection and mitigation a demanding task. However, effective strategies can help network administrators navigate this complex issue.

In this regard, Behavior Analysis Tools (BATs) can be instrumental. These solutions scrutinize network activity to identify anomalies that deviate from established user behavior patterns. This continuous monitoring can flag unexpected or suspicious actions, providing early warning signs of potential insider threats. However, the key to leveraging BATs is defining what constitutes “normal” behavior, which requires an in-depth understanding of user roles and activities within the network.

Likewise, the implementation of Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) can help identify unauthorized access points within the network. These systems work by monitoring network traffic for suspicious activities or violations of network policies. When an intrusion is detected, the IDS alerts the network administrator, who can then take necessary actions to neutralize the threat. To enhance the effectiveness of IDS, it should be paired with an Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), which not only detects but also prevents network intrusions.

Enforcing strict access control policies is another crucial strategy. These policies should clearly outline who has access to what data and when, creating boundaries that can prevent unauthorized access and data leakage. For these policies to be effective, they need to be comprehensive, updated regularly, and communicated effectively to all network users.

Providing regular security training for employees is also essential. Many insider threats are unintentional, often resulting from a lack of understanding of security best practices. By educating employees about the importance of network security and the potential consequences of their actions, organizations can significantly reduce the likelihood of insider threats.

Finally, a comprehensive audit of network access can reveal potential weak spots, such as rogue access points, and provide insights into the effectiveness of current security measures. Regular audits, coupled with the continuous monitoring provided by BATs and IDS, create a robust defense against insider threats and rogue network access points.

By adopting these strategies, network administrators can significantly enhance their ability to manage and mitigate potential insider threats and rogue access points, fortifying their network against these often overlooked but critical security challenges.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

Why Integrated Network Security Architecture is the Future

Integrated network security architecture is the design of a network to defend against cyber attacks. It is simply securing a network by integrating different security features. It is a systematic approach to designing and implementing a set of cybersecurity measures that are synergistic and mutually supportive to one another, to provide an increased level of protection.

With an integrated network security architecture, you can integrate multiple layers of protection into one cohesive system. This includes technologies, people, processes and policies. These layers work together to provide comprehensive protection for the company’s IT resources and data. It involves selecting hardware, software and services, their configuration and deployment, and how they are managed.

The security method is often referred to as the “defense-in-depth” approach. This means that it focuses on protecting data from a variety of different angles, as opposed to using just one single method. No wonder it has proven to be the most effective means of securing your network.

The three main layers of network security architecture are:

I. The Physical Layer

This includes everything from the cables and wireless antennas to the actual devices that make up your network. It is a form of perimeter protection that shields your network from wireless interference.

II. The Data Link Layer

This is where all data passes through on its way to being transmitted over the network. By default, this poses a vulnerable pathway requiring network and data protection.

III. The Network Layer

It is also referred to as endpoint protection because it is the last layer to ensure your network’s security.

Why is Integrated Network Security Architecture Important?

The integration of network security architecture is important as it helps to protect the network against cyber threats. It effectively provides a holistic view of the entire system, which is necessary for maintaining a secure and reliable network environment.

Network security is a vital part of any organization’s IT infrastructure. It is important to have an integrated network security architecture in place to protect the organization’s data and resources. This is especially crucial for organizations or even individuals that have data that they want to protect.

Four Proven Practices In Integrated Network Security Architecture

I. Perform a Threat Assessment of Your Organization’s Networks

A threat assessment is a process of identifying the potential threats to an organization and then determining how these threats might be realized. This would help to determine what measures to take to prevent it, thereby protecting your network and data.

Therefore, during any threat assessment, the first thing to do is to identify the assets in your organization. This aims to determine what would be at the risk in an attack. By putting yourself in the shoes of an attacker, you will be able to detect the assets that need to be protected.

The next step is to determine what type of threats might be present. It is important to know what kind of technology your company uses and how it might be vulnerable. Note that the major difference between threats and vulnerability is that threats are those who would want to cause harm, while vulnerabilities are weaknesses that the threats can exploit.

The last step is to develop a response plan for preventing, detecting, and responding to threats. This includes prioritizing the threats and vulnerabilities based on their level of severity and probability of occurrence.

When it comes to integrated network security architecture, threats can be categorized in two ways:

  • Technical Threats – A technical threat is when a system or network is compromised through a computer exploit or malware that disrupts its operations. This type involves exploiting security vulnerabilities in software or hardware to gain access to data and resources. Some common examples are; hacking, malware, denial of service attacks, etc.
  • Non-Technical Threats – This takes a more hands-on approach and can consist of things like insider fraud and theft of trade secrets.

II. Conduct a Business Impact Analysis

A business impact analysis is a process that can help an organization identify its risks and impacts related to network disruptions or attacks. It also helps businesses understand the vulnerabilities they might have.

It serves as a methodology that can be used to assess the impacts of disruption that might occur in the event of a cyber attack.. The analysis should be conducted by the risk management team, with input from other stakeholders within the organization.

The main objective of this analysis is to identify and prioritize risks and impacts, as well as to understand how an event will affect different parts of the organization. Analysis should also help in understanding how much time is required for recovery after a disruption or attack.

This type of analysis helps the business make decisions to mitigate its risks and impacts for the future. If an organization fully understands what would happen if there were network disruptions or attacks on their systems, it will help them understand the precise impact it might have on their business operations. Moreover, it could also prepare them for a scenario where events could happen more frequently in the future.

III. Develop a Strategy for Handling Security Incidents

Security incidents are occurring these days at an unprecedented rate. This includes any event that can negatively impact the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of an organization’s data.

It is important to have a strategy in place for how to handle them, which includes clear priorities, responsibilities, and procedures. Below is a tested incident response plan template or incident response process that you need to emulate.

IV. Assess the Severity of the Situation

When faced with a security threat, the first step is to assess the severity of the security incident and determine whether it needs to be handled by higher-level personnel or not.

If it does, they should be notified and assigned responsibility for handling the incident. If not, then a lower-level employee should take on responsibility for handling it themselves or with assistance from someone else who is available and qualified to do so.

Your assessment should follow this pattern:

  • Think about the threats that you are likely to face.
  • Make sure that your plan is flexible enough to adapt to new threats as they emerge.
  • Consider the need for interoperability with other networks, such as your partners’ networks, suppliers’ networks and customers’ networks, when designing your network architecture.
  • Determine the level of protection needed, and how much funding is available before designing your security architecture and plan.

Consider your business needs and how much risk you are willing to take on, your when designing your security architecture and plan so that these factors can be aligned.

Contain the Damage

The second priority in handling a security incident is to contain the damage. This includes notifying those who need to know, containing the spread of any virus or malware, and preventing future incidents. Depending on the type of breach, this may include initiating a forensic investigation or contacting law enforcement.

Your containment strategy should:

  • Properly segment networks with firewalls
  • Perform vulnerability assessments
  • Implement intrusion detection systems
  • Install antivirus protection on all devices
  • Use two-factor authentication for access to data and accounts
  • Protect endpoints with endpoint security solutions
  • Ensure that servers are patched and updated regularly
  • Encrypt sensitive data that is stored on the network or devices

Prevent Similar Future Attacks

The third priority when it comes to integrated network security architecture is to identify what happened and how it happened. This includes identifying who and what data was affected by the breach, if any other systems were compromised, and how to prevent similar future attacks.

Make sure that your prevention plan encompasses the two implementations below:

  • Develop an operational plan
  • Implement controls to address identified risks in the system design, physical architecture, logical architecture designs, and operational plans.

IV. Assign IT Staff to Identified Roles & Tasks

By having a dedicated IT security team, you can effectively delegate security roles and responsibilities to ensure quick detection and mitigation of present and future security threats.

About Version 2 Digital

Version 2 Digital is one of the most dynamic IT companies in Asia. The company distributes a wide range of IT products across various areas including cyber security, cloud, data protection, end points, infrastructures, system monitoring, storage, networking, business productivity and communication products.

Through an extensive network of channels, point of sales, resellers, and partnership companies, Version 2 offers quality products and services which are highly acclaimed in the market. Its customers cover a wide spectrum which include Global 1000 enterprises, regional listed companies, different vertical industries, public utilities, Government, a vast number of successful SMEs, and consumers in various Asian cities.

About Portnox
Portnox provides simple-to-deploy, operate and maintain network access control, security and visibility solutions. Portnox software can be deployed on-premises, as a cloud-delivered service, or in hybrid mode. It is agentless and vendor-agnostic, allowing organizations to maximize their existing network and cybersecurity investments. Hundreds of enterprises around the world rely on Portnox for network visibility, cybersecurity policy enforcement and regulatory compliance. The company has been recognized for its innovations by Info Security Products Guide, Cyber Security Excellence Awards, IoT Innovator Awards, Computing Security Awards, Best of Interop ITX and Cyber Defense Magazine. Portnox has offices in the U.S., Europe and Asia. For information visit http://www.portnox.com, and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn.。

×

Hello!

Click one of our contacts below to chat on WhatsApp

Social Chat is free, download and try it now here!

×